Abstract
Objective
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier in preventing and/or reducing postoperative adhesion during gynecological surgery.
Design
This was a prospective, controlled, blinded, and randomized study. Patient blinding was performed intraoperatively. Subjects were randomly assigned to the SprayShield™ or the control group in a 2:1 ratio.
Setting
The study was conducted at the Clinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, at the University Hospital for Gynecology in Germany.
Patients
Fifteen patients participated in this study; nine patients were assigned to the SprayShield™ and six patients to the control group.
Interventions
During first operation (FLL) in the SprayShield™ group, the agent was applied to all myomectomy suture lines. Patients in the control group did not receive any anti-adhesion treatment, only good surgical practice. A second-look laparoscopy (SLL) was performed 8–12 weeks after myomectomy to evaluate adhesion formation.
Main outcome measures
Main outcome measures were incidence, severity, and extent of uterine adhesions.
Results
No significant differences were found between the two study groups.
Conclusions
SprayShield™ is easy to use. No serious adverse event related to SprayShield™ was observed. Efficacy data are inconclusive regarding the performance of SprayShield™. Further studies are needed to better understand this performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Practice committee of the American society for reproductive medicine in collaboration with the society of reproductive surgeons (2006) Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery. Fertil Steril 86(Suppl 4):S1–S5
Wilson MS, Menzies D, Knight A, Crowe AM (2002) Demonstrating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of adhesion reduction strategies. Colorectol Dis 4:355–360
De Wilde RL, Trew G (2007) Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in gynecological surgery. Gynecol Surg 4:161–168
Mais V, Cirronis MG, Peiretti M, Ferrucci G, Cossu E, Melis GB (2012) Efficacy of auto-crosslinked hyaluronan gel for adhesion prevention in laparoscopy and hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 160(1):1–5
Brochhausen C, Schmitt VH, Planck CNE, Rajab TK, Hollemann D, Tapprich C, Krämer B, Wallwiener C, Hierlemann H, Zehbe R, Planck H, Kirkpatrick CJ (2012) Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention. J Gastrointest Surg 16(6):1256–1274
Ferland R, Campbell PK (2009) Pre-clinical evaluation of a next-generation spray adhesion barrier for multiple site adhesion protection. Surg Technol Int 18:137–143
Trew G, Pistofidis G, Pados G, Lower A, Mettler L, Wallwiener D, Korell M, Pouly JL, Coccia ME, Audebert A, Nappi C, Schmidt E, McVeigh E, Landi S, Degueldre M, Konincxk P, Rimbach S, Chapron C, Dallay D, Röemer T, McConnachie A, Ford I, Crowe A, Knight A, Dizerega G, Dewilde R (2011) Gynaecological endoscopic evaluation of 4% icodextrin solution: a European, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study of the efficacy and safety in the reduction of de novo adhesions after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Hum Reprod 26(8):2015–2027
De Wilde RL, Trew G (2007) Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in gynaecological surgery: expert consensus position. Part 1 & 2—steps to reduce adhesions. Gynecol Surg. Gynecol Surg 4:243–253
Ellis H (1971) The cause and prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet 133(3):497–511
ten Broek RPG, Issa Y, van Santbrink EJP, Bouvy ND, Kruitwagen RFPM, Jeekel J, Bakkum EA, Rovers MM, van Goor H (2013) Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis. BMJ 347:f5588. doi:10.1136/bmj.f5588
Okabayashi K, Ashrafian H, Zacharakis E, Hasegawa H, Kitagawa Y, Athanasiou T, Darzi A (2013) Adhesions after abdominal surgery: a systematic review of the incidence, distribution and severity. Surg Today. [Epub ahead of print]
Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, Clark D, Boyd JH, Finlayson AR, Knight AD, Crowe AM, Surgical and Clinical Research Group (2004) Adhesion-related readmissions following gynecological laparoscopy or laparotomy in Scotland: an epidemiological study of 24,046 patients. Hum Reprod 19(8):1877–1885
Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, McGuire A, Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, O’Brien F, Buchan S, Crowe AM (1999) Adhesion related hospital readmissions after abdominal pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 353:1476–1480
Jin C, Hu Y, Chen XC, Zheng FY, Lin F, Zhou K, Chen FD, Gu HZ (2009) Laparoscopic versus open mymectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 145(1):14–21
Kasum M (2009) Fertility following myomectomy. Acta Clin Croat 48:137–143
Wallwiener M, Brölmann H, Koninckx PR, Lundorff P, Lower AM, Wattiez A, Mara M, De Wilde RL (2012) Adhesions after abdominal, pelvic and intra-uterine surgery, and their prevention. Gynecol Surg 9:465–466
Takeuchi H, Kinoshita K (2002) Evaluation of adhesion formation after laparoscopic myomectomy by systematic second-look microlaparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9(4):442–446
Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Shimanuki H, Kumakiri J, Kinoshita K (2005) Adhesion-prevention effects of fibrin sealants after laparoscopic myomectomy as determined by second-look laparoscopy. J Reprod Med 50(8):571–577
Hirschelmann A, Tchartchian G, Wallwiener M, Hackethal A, De Wilde RL (2012) A review of the problematic adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1089–1097
Buletti C, Polli V, Negrini V (1996) Adhesion formation after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3:533–536
Myomectomy Adhesion Multicenter Study Group (1995) An expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier (gore-tex surgical membrane) reduces post-myomectomy adhesion formation. Fertil Steril 63:491–493
Tulandi T, Murray C, Guralnick M (1993) Adhesion formation and reproductive outcome after myomectomy and second look laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 82:213–215
Dubuisson J-B, Fauconnier A, Chapron C, Kreiker G, Nörgaard C (1998) Second look after laparoscopic myomectomy. Hum Reprod 13(8):2102–2106
Di Gregorio A, Maccario S, Raspollini M (2002) The role of laparoscopic myomectomy in women of reproductive age. Reprod Biomed Online 4(Suppl 3):55–58
Wiseman DM, Trout JR, Diamond MP (1998) The rates of adhesion development and the effects of crystalloid solutions on adhesion development in pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril 70(4):702–711
Di Zerega GS, Verco SJ, Young P, Kettel M, Kobak W, Martin D, Sanfilippo J, Peers EM, Scrimgeour A, Brown CB (2002) A randomized, controlled pilot study of the safety and efficiacy of 4% Icodextrin solution in the reduction of adhesions following laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Hum Reprod 17(4):1031–1038
Mettler L, Audebert A, Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Schive-Peterhansl K, Jacobs VR (2004) A randomized, prospective, controlled, multicenter clinical trial of a sprayable, site-specific adhesion barrier system in patients undergoing myomectomy. Fertil Steril 82(2):398–404
Acknowledgments
This study was sponsored by Covidien.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tchartchian, G., Hackethal, A., Herrmann, A. et al. Evaluation of SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier in a single center: randomized controlled study in 15 women undergoing reconstructive surgery after laparoscopic myomectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290, 697–704 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3251-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3251-3