Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The changing motives of cesarean section: from the ancient world to the twenty-first century

  • Review
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cesarean delivery has been practiced for ages, although originally as a universally postmortem procedure. It is referred to in the myths and folklore of many ancient societies, for some of the infants delivered in this way survived, even though their mothers did not. Since the Renaissance, the objective of the procedure has gradually shifted towards saving the lives of both the mother and the child, and this has become ever more possible, as maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity decreased dramatically during the twentieth century.

Current issues

Today (at the beginning of twenty-first century), we are not only concerned with the safety and health of the mother and the child, but also with mother’s desires and preferences and the child’s rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dictionary of Obstetrics and Gynecology (1988) de Gruyter, Berlin, p 45

  2. Greenhill JP (1995) Obstetrics, 11th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 986–1033

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boley JP (1991) The history of caesarean section. Can Med Assoc J 145:319–322

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lurie S, Mamet Y (2001) “Yotzeh dofen”: cesarean section in the days of the Mishna and the Talmud. Isr J Obstet Gynecol 12:111–113

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blumenfeld-Kosinski R (1990) Not of woman born. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 7–47

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lopez-Zeno JA, Carlo WA, O’Grady JP, Fanaroff AA (1990) Infant survival following delayed postmortem cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 76:91–92

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pinsent J (1969) Greek mythology. Hamlyn, London, p 82

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gaius Plinius Secundus. Natural History. 77 CE (VII, ix,47)

  9. Galbert HA, Bey M (1988) History and development of cesarean operation. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 15:591–605

    Google Scholar 

  10. Trolle D (1982) The history of cesarean section. Reitzel CA, Copenhagen, pp 15–25

  11. Sahname-I Firdevsi (2002) 1549. Reproduced in Nil Sari. Turkish medical history through miniature pictures exhibition. Istanbul, Turkey, pp 104–111

  12. Ehrhard FK, Friedrichs K, Diener MS, Fischer-Schreiber I, Schuhmacher S (1994) Encyclopedia of Eastern Philosophy and Religion. Shambhala, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oppenheim AL (1960) A cesarean section in the second millennium B.C. J Hist Med 15:292–294

    Google Scholar 

  14. Luire S (2004) The forceps of Albucasis. Bull Isr Soc Obstet Gynecol 2:41–42

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pundel J (1969) L’histoire de l’opération césarienne. Presses Académiques Européennes, Brussels, p 57

    Google Scholar 

  16. The laws of the kings. Rome, 8th/7th cent. B.C. (FIRA 2, vol. 1, p 3. Tr. ARS, rev. L)

  17. Justinian. Corpus Iuris Civilis. Digest 11,8,2. 533 CE

  18. Soranus of Ephesos (1956) Soranus’ gynecology. In: Trans. Owsei Temkin. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

  19. Schaffer J (1996) “Born from the flank”—discussion concerning “cesarean section” in animals in the Talmud. Sud Arch Z Wissen 80:198–204

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gmarah, Erchin, chapter 1, page 7, folio 1

  21. Mishnah, Bechoroth, chapter 2, p 47

  22. Lurie S, Glezerman M (2003) The history of cesarean technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1803–1806

    Google Scholar 

  23. Speert H (1986) Historical highlights. In: Danforth DN, Scott JR (eds) Obstetrics and gynecology, 5th edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 2–22

    Google Scholar 

  24. Patrologiae cursus completes: series latina. In: Migne JP (ed) Paris, 1844–1864. 212, col 63, no 6

  25. Bernard of Gordon. Practica sive lilium medicinae. Lyons, p 1498

  26. Radd-Ul-Muchtar (1844) Cairo, Egypt

  27. Abu Raihan Muhamad Al-Biruni (973–1048 C.E.) Al-asrar al-baqiyah al-qurum al-khaliydh. Manuscript 161. Edinburgh University Library, Scotland

  28. Albucasis (1973) On surgery and instruments: a definitive edition of the Arabic text with English translation and commentary by Spink MS and Lewis GL. The Welcome Institute of the History of Medicine, London

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rousset F (1581) Traitte nouveau de l’hysterotomotokie, ou enfantment Caesarien. Denys du Val, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mauriceau F (1683) The diseases of women with child, and in child-bed (English translation, 2nd edn). Darby, London

    Google Scholar 

  31. Harris RP (1881) Special statistics of the cesarean operation in the United States, showing the success and failures in each state. Am J Obstet 144:341–361

    Google Scholar 

  32. Miller JL (1938) Cesarean section in Virginia in the pre-aseptic era. 1794–1879. Ann Med Hist 20:23–35

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lungren SS (1881) A case of cesarean section twice successfully performed on the same patient, with remarks on the time, indications, and details of the operation. Am J Obstet 14:78–94

    Google Scholar 

  34. Weems ML (1836) Am J Med Sci 8:257

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sanger M (1882) Der Kaiserschnitt. Arch Gynakol 19:370

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kehrer FA (1882) Über ein modifiziertes Verfahren beim Kaiserschnitt. Arch Gynakol Bd 19:117

    Google Scholar 

  37. Porro E (1876) Della amputazione utero-ovarica come complemento di taglio cesareo. Annu Univ Med Chir (Milan) 237:289–350

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cunningham FG, MacDonald PC, Gant NF, Levono KJ, Gilstrap LC III, Hankins GDV, Clark SL (1997) Williams obstetrics, 20th edn. Appleton and Lange, Stamford, pp 509–532

    Google Scholar 

  39. Craigin EB (1916) Conservatism in obstetrics. N Y Med J 104:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kerr JMM (1926) The technique of cesarean section, with special reference to the lower uterine segment incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol 12:729–734

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bretelle F, Cravello L, Shojai R, Roger V, D’ercole C, Blanc B (2001) Vaginal birth following two previous cesarean sections. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 94:23–26

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR (2000) Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial: term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 356:375–383

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lurie S, Mamet Y (2003) Cesarean delivery during maternal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for status asthmaticus. Emerg Med J 20:296–297

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wagner M (2000) Choosing cesarean section. Lancet 356:677–680

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ikemoto LC (1998) Forced cesareans. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 10:465–468

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fitzpatrick M, O’Herlihy C (2000) Vaginal birth and perineal trauma. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 12:487–490

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fitzpatrick M, O’Herlihy C (2001) The effects of labour and delivery on the pelvic floor. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 15:63–79

    Google Scholar 

  48. Farrell SA, Allen VM, Baskett TF (2001) Parturition and urinary incontinence in primiparas. Obstet Gynecol 97:350–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ryding EL, Wijma K, Wijma B (1998) Psychological impact of emergency cesarean section in comparison with elective cesarean section, instrumental and normal vaginal delivery. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 19:135–144

    Google Scholar 

  50. Paterson-Brown S, Fisk N (1997) Cesarean section: every woman’s right to choose? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 9:351–358

    Google Scholar 

  51. Husslein P (2001) Elective caesarean section versus vaginal delivery: whither the end of traditional obstetrics? Arch Gynecol Obstet 265:169–174

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Samuel Lurie

Authors
  1. Samuel Lurie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Lurie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lurie, S. The changing motives of cesarean section: from the ancient world to the twenty-first century. Arch Gynecol Obstet 271, 281–285 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0724-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0724-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation