Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

High-resolution color-Doppler ultrasound for the study of skin growths

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 07 April 2015

Abstract

High-resolution (17 MHz) color-Doppler ultrasound (US) is used in the evaluation of normal and pathological skin. To analyze retrospectively the sonographic pattern of healthy skin and of some skin lesions using Doppler US and to compare the results with dermoscopy examination and histology to identify specific patterns of ultrasound for differentiating benign from malignant lesions. To select among them the Melanomas to describe their US pattern, the presence and morphology of vascular signal and to compare their thickness at US with the Breslow index. After signing informed consent in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki in 1964 and its subsequent amendments, 104 patients with skin lesions were retrospectively studied. Patients were evaluated with clinical dermatological examination and Doppler US, and underwent surgical excision with subsequent histological analysis. Statistical analysis: the difference between variables was analyzed with statistical Chi square test or Fisher’s when appropriate. The strength of the relationship between variables was analyzed with Pearson’s r coefficient. The sensitivity and specificity of US tests were also calculated. Sixty-five malignant lesions and 39 benign lesions were identified at Doppler US. In the 34 melanomas, typical US and vascular patterns were identified depending on the thickness of the lesion and a strong correlation between the latter and Breslow index was confirmed. Doppler US is a valuable diagnostic tool for the study of skin and for pre-excision characterization of skin lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander H, Miller DL (1979) Determining skin thickness with pulsed ultrasound. J Invest Dermatol 72(1):17–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aspres N, Egerton IB, Lim AC, Shumack SP (2003) Imaging the skin. Australas J Dermatol 44(1):19–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bessoud B, Lassau N, Koscielny S, Longvert C, Avril MF, Duvillard P, Rouffiac V, Leclère J, Roche A (2003) High-frequency sonography and color Doppler in the management of pigmented skin lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 29(6):875–879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Breslow A (1970) Thickness, cross-sectional areas and depth of invasion in the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg 172:902–908

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cammarota T, Pinto F, Magliaro A, Sarno A (1998) A current uses of diagnostic high-frequency US in dermatology. Eur J Radiol 27(Suppl 2):215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Catalano O, Siani A (2010) Cutaneous melanoma: role of ultrasound in the assessment of locoregional spread. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 39:30–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Catalano O, Voit C, Sandomenico F, Mandato Y, Petrillo M, Franco R, Botti G, Caracò C, Mozzillo N, D’Errico AG (2011) Previously reported sonographic appearances of regional melanoma metastases are not likely due to necrosis. J Ultrasound Med 30(8):1041–1049

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Catalano O (2011) Critical analysis of the ultrasonographic criteria for diagnosing lymph node metastasis in patients with cutaneous melanoma: a Systematic review. J Ultrasound Med 30:547–560

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Catalano O, Caraco C, Mozzillo N, Siani A (2010) Locoregional spread of cutaneous melanoma: sonography findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:735–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Choo HJ, Lee SJ, Lee YH (2010) Pilomatricomas: the diagnostic value of ultrasound. Skeletal Radiol 39:243–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clément A, Hoeffel C, Fayet P, Benkanoun S, Sahut D’izarn J, Oudjit A, Legmann P, Gorin I, Escande J, Bonnin A (2001) Value of high frequency (20 MHz) and Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of pigmented cutaneous tumors. J Radiol 82(5):563–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Crisan D, Lupsor M, Boca A, Crisan M, Badea R (2012) Ultrasonographic assessment of skin structure according to age. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 78(4):519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Giovagnorio F, Andreoli C, De Cicco ML (1999) Color Doppler sonography of focal lesions of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. J Ultrasound Med 18(2):89–93

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harland CC, Bamber JC, Gusterson BA, Mortimer PS (1993) High frequency, high resolution ultrasound in the assessment of skin tumours. Br J Dermatol 128(5):525–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kleinerman R, Whang TB, Bard RL, Marmur ES (2012) Review ultrasound in dermatology: principles and applications. J Am Acad Dermatol 67(3):478–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lassau N, Chami L, Benatsou B, Peronneau P, Roche A (2007) Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US) with quantification of tumor perfusion: a new diagnostic tool to evaluate the early effects of antiangiogenic treatment. Eur Radiol 17(6):89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lassau N, Chapotot L, Benatsou B, Vilgrain V, Kind M, Lacroix J, Cuinet M, Taieb S, Aziza R, Sarran A, Labbe C, Gallix B, Lucidarme O, Ptak Y, Rocher L, Caquot LM, Chagnon S, Marion D, Luciani A, Uzan-Augui J, Koscielny S (2012) Standardization of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of antiangiogenic therapies: the French multicenter Support for I Innovative and Expensive Techniques Study. Invest Radiol 47(12):711–716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lassau N, Chebil M, Chami L, Bidault S, Girard E, Roche A (2010) Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US): a new tool for the early evaluation of antiangiogenic treatment. Target Oncol 5(1):53–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lassau N, Spatz A, Avril MF, Tardivon A, Margulis A, Mamelle G, Vanel D, Leclere J (1997) Value of high-frequency US for preoperative assessment of skin tumors. Radiographics 17(6):1559–1565

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lassau N, Lamuraglia M (2006) Prognostic value of angiogenesis evaluated with high frequency and colour Doppler sonography for preoperative assessment of primary cutaneous melanomas: correlation with recurrence after a 5 year follow-up period. Cancer Imaging 25(6):24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mandava A, Ravuri PR, Konathan R (2013) High-resolution ultrasound imaging of cutaneous lesions. Indian J Radiol Imaging 23(3):269–277

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pellacani G, Seidenari S (2003) Preoperative melanoma thickness determination by 20-MHz sonography and digital videomicroscopy in combination. Arch Dermatol 139(3):293–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Polańska A, Aleksandra Dańczak-Pazdrowska A, Silny W, Jenerowicz D, Olek-Hrab K, Osmola- Mańkowska A (2013) Nonlesional skin in atopic dermatitis is seemingly healthy skin—observations using noninvasive methods. Videosurgery Miniinv 8(3):192–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pupelli G, Longo C (2013) Small diameter melanocytic lesions: morphological analysis by means of in vivo confocal microscopy. Br J Dermatol 168(5):1027–1033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rallan D, Harland CC (2003) Ultrasound in dermatology—basic principles and applications. Clin Exp Dermatol 28:632–638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sandby-Moller J, Wulf HC (2004) Ultrasonographic subepidermal low-echogenic band, dependence of age and body site. Skin Res Technol 10(1):57–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sandby-Møller J, Thieden E, Philipsen PA, Schmidt G, Wulf HC (2004) Dermal echogenicity: a biological indicator of individual cumulative UVR exposure. Arch Dermatol Res 295(11):498–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Serrone L, Solivetti F, Thorel M, Eibenschuntz L, Donati P, Catricalà C (2002) High frequency ultrasound in the preoperative staging of primary melanoma: a statistical analysis. Melanoma Res 12:287–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Srivastava A, Woodcock JP, Mansel RE, Webster DJ, Laidler P, Hughes LE, Dwivedi A (2012) Doppler ultrasound flowmetry predicts 15 year outcome in patients with skin melanoma. Indian J Surg 74(4):278–283

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ulrich J, Petereit S, Gollnick H (1999) Preoperative sonographic diagnosis of melanoma—comparison of 7,5- and 20 MHz sonography. Ultrashall Med 20(5):197–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wortsman X, Wortsman J (2010) Clinical usefulness of variable-frequency ultrasound in localized lesions of the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 62:247–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wortsman X (2012) Common applications of dermatologic sonography. J Ultrasound Med 31(1):97–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze Biomorfologiche e Funzionali sezione Radiodiagnostica, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, Naples, Italy

    Maria Scotto di Santolo, Marco Sagnelli & Marco Salvatore

  2. IBB Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Napoli, Naples, Italy

    Marcello Mancini

  3. Dipartimento di Patologa Sistematica, sezione di Dermatologia Clinica Allergologica e Venereologica, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Naples, Italy

    Massimiliano Scalvenzi, Mario Delfino & Fabio Ayala

  4. Dipartimento di Chirurgia Plastica, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Naples, Italy

    Fabrizio Schonauer & Guido Molea

Authors
  1. Maria Scotto di Santolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marco Sagnelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marcello Mancini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Massimiliano Scalvenzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mario Delfino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fabrizio Schonauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Guido Molea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fabio Ayala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Marco Salvatore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Scotto di Santolo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scotto di Santolo, M., Sagnelli, M., Mancini, M. et al. High-resolution color-Doppler ultrasound for the study of skin growths. Arch Dermatol Res 307, 559–566 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-015-1538-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-015-1538-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation