Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis patients: clinical and radiological results of 1–8 years follow-up

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

We investigated whether the Discovery total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) system had good results and survival in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

Methods

In a prospective cohort study, one elbow surgeon performed TEA on 25 consecutive RA patients (31 elbows) between December 2004 and November 2012 using the Discovery system. We evaluated the preoperative elbow range of motion (ROM), functional outcome with QuickDash and quality of life with EQ-5D. An independent colleague evaluated the same parameters 1–8 years (mean 4.5) postoperatively. The medical records of the follow-up visits for the study period were available for review.

Results

A complete set of results was available for 19 patients (25 elbows). The mean ROM improved in flexion/extension from 88° (SD 27) to 113° (SD 19) and in pronation/supination from 55° (SD 28) to 68° (SD 22) (p < 0.05). The mean QuickDash also improved from 66.5 (SD 25.7) to 40.2 (SD 24) (p < 0.01). The mean EQ-5D improved from 0.68 (SD 0.2) to 0.75 (SD 0.13) but was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). Three patients were revised because of loosening, 2 more patients were re-operated. This resulted in a Kaplan–Meier survival of 90 % (CI 72–97) for the study period.

Conclusion

The Discovery system has shown satisfactory results in RA patients even if the rate of complication remained relatively high. Further follow-up is required to investigate the radiological changes observed in some of our patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jämsen E, Virta LJ, Hakala M, Kauppi MJ, Malmivaara A, Lehto MU (2013) The decline in joint replacement surgery in rheumatoid arthritis is associated with a concomitant increase in the intensity of anti-rheumatic therapy: a nationwide register-based study from 1995 through 2010. Acta Orthop 84:331–337

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weiss RJ, Ehlin A, Montgomery SM, Wick MC, Stark A, Wretenberg P (2008) Decrease of RA-related orthopaedic surgery of the upper limbs between 1998 and 2004: data from 54,579 Swedish RA inpatients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47:491–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ehrlich GE (2001) Incidence of elbow involvement in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 28:1739

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fevang BT, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Skredderstuen A, Furnes O (2009) Results after 562 total elbow replacements: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:449–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giannicola G, Scacchi M, Polimanti D, Cinotti G (2014) Discovery elbow system: 2- to 5-year results in distal humerus fractures and posttraumatic conditions: a prospective study on 24 patients. J Hand Surg Am 39:1746–1756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hastings H 2nd, Lee DH, Pietrzak WS (2014) A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Discovery elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:e95–e107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jenkins PJ, Watts AC, Norwood T, Duckworth AD, Rymaszewski LA, McEachan JE (2013) Total elbow replacement: outcome of 1,146 arthroplasties from the Scottish Arthroplasty Project. Acta Orthop 84:119–123

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Little CP, Graham AJ, Karatzas G, Woods DA, Carr AJ (2005) Outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: comparative study of three implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2439–2448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gay DM, Lyman S, Do H, Hotchkiss RN, Marx RG, Daluiski A (2012) Indications and reoperation rates for total elbow arthroplasty: an analysis of trends in New York State. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:110–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jain A, Stein BE, Skolasky RL, Jones LC, Hungerford MW (2012) Total joint arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a United States experience from 1992 through 2005. J Arthroplasty 27:881–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rasmussen JV, Olsen BS, Fevang BT, Furnes O, Skytta ET, Rahme H, Salomonsson B, Mohammed KD, Page RS, Carr AJ (2012) A review of national shoulder and elbow joint replacement registries. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:1328–1335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gill DR, Morrey BF (1998) The Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A ten to fifteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1327–1335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mansat P, Bonnevialle N, Rongieres M, Mansat M, Bonnevialle P (2013) Results with a minimum of 10 years follow-up of the Coonrad/Morrey total elbow arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:S337–S343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Patil N, Cheung EV, Mow CS (2009) High revision rate after total elbow arthroplasty with a linked semiconstrained device. Orthopedics 32:321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Little CP, Graham AJ, Carr AJ (2005) Total elbow arthroplasty. A systematic review of the literature in the English language until the end of 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:437–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hastings H 2nd (2004) Minimally constrained elbow implant arthroplasty: the Discovery elbow system. Tech Hand Extrem Surg 8:34–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hastings H 2nd, Theng CS (2003) Total elbow replacement for distal humerus fractures and traumatic deformity: results and complications of semiconstrained implants and design rationale for the Discovery elbow system. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 32(9 Suppl):20–28

    Google Scholar 

  18. Swedish shoulder and elbow arthroplasty registry 2011 and 2012. http://ssas.se/files/docs/rapp13.pdf. Accessed Sep 2014 (Swedish)

  19. Wadsworth TG (1979) A modified posterolateral approach to the elbow and proximal radioulnar joints. Clin Orthop Relat Res 144:151–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rau R, Herborn G (1995) A modified version of Larsen’s scoring method to assess radiologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 22:1976–1982

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Plaschke HC, Thillemann TM, Brorson S, Olsen BS (2014) Implant survival after total elbow arthroplasty: a retrospective study of 324 procedures performed from 1980 to 2008. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:829–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Qureshi F, Draviaraj KP, Stanley D (2010) The Kudo 5 total elbow replacement in the treatment of the rheumatoid elbow: results at a minimum of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1416–1421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cross MB, Cicalese E, Nam D, McArthur BA, Lipman JD, Figgie MP (2014) Results of custom-fit, noncemented, semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty for inflammatory arthritis at an average of eighteen years of follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 23:1368–1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kelly EW, Coghlan J, Bell S (2004) Five- to thirteen-year follow-up of the GSB III total elbow arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:434–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Skyttä ET, Eskelinen A, Paavolainen P, Ikävalko M, Remes V (2009) Total elbow arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based study from the Finnish ArthroplastyRegister. Acta Orthop 80:472–477

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Puskas GJ, Morrey BF, Sanchez-Sotelo J (2014) Aseptic loosening rate of the humeral stem in the Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty. Does size matter? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:76–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim JM, Mudgal CS, Konopka JF, Jupiter JB (2011) Complications of total elbow arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19:328–339 (Review)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Voloshin I, Schippert DW, Kakar S, Kaye EK, Morrey BF (2011) Complications of total elbow replacement: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:158–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shi LL, Zurakowski D, Jones DG, Koris MJ, Thornhill TS (2007) Semiconstrained primary and revision total elbow arthroplasty with use of the Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1467–1475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rispoli DM, Athwal GS, Morrey BF (2008) Neurolysis of the ulnar nerve for neuropathy following total elbow replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1348–1351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has actual or potential conflicts of interest related to the subject of this article.

Ethical standard statement

The Ethics Committee at Umeå University approved the study (No. 2013/453-31).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arkan S. Sayed-Noor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukka, S., Berg, G., Hassany, H.R.H. et al. Semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis patients: clinical and radiological results of 1–8 years follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135, 595–600 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2191-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2191-0

Keywords

Navigation