Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of anthropometric features on graft diameter in ACL reconstruction

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is a paucity of literature regarding the influence of anthropometric features on the hamstring graft obtained in ACL reconstruction. This study was undertaken to assess the influence of anthropometric measurements on the graft diameter obtained at ACL reconstruction surgery within the European population. We hypothesise that anthropometric features do influence graft thickness in ACL reconstruction.

Materials and methods

Data from 121 consecutive patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction by the same surgeon using quadruple hamstring grafts were analysed. The body mass index (BMI), height and weight of these patients were correlated with the graft diameter obtained during surgery. Regression analysis was undertaken to assess the influence of individual anthropometric variables on the graft diameter.

Results

There were 121 patients with mean age of 32 years (14–55). There was a statistically significant positive correlation individually between the height and graft diameter (r = 0.38, p < 0.01) as well as between the body weight and graft diameter (r = 0.29, p < 0.01). However, when the body mass index was calculated, the correlation was not statistically significant (r = 0.08, p > 0.1). Regression analysis confirmed that BMI was not statistically significant as a predictor of hamstring graft diameter whereas height was statistically the most important predictor (F = 20.1; p < 0.01).This yielded the predictive equation, graft diameter = 4.5 + 0.02 x Ht (in cm).

Conclusion

Although body mass index did not significantly correlate, body height may be a predictive variable in predicting the graft diameter in ACL reconstruction and provide useful pre operative information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson DL, Warner JJ (1993) Diagnosis for anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Clin Sports Med 12:671–684

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Strickland SM, MacGillivray JD, Warren RF (2003) Anterior cruciate reconstruction with allograft tendons. Orthop Clin North Am 34(1):41–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carey JL, Dunn WR, Dahm DL et al (2009) A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(9):2242–2250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Krych AJ, Jackson JD, Hoskin TL et al (2008) A meta-analysis of patella tendon autograft versus patella tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24(3):292–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Samuelsson K, Andersson D, Karlsson J (2009) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to graft type and surgical technique: an assessment of randomised control trials. Arthroscopy 25(10):1139–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tuman JM, Diduch RD, Rubino JL et al (2007) Predictors for hamstring graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35(11):1945–1949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwartzberg R, Burkhart B, Lariviere C et al (2008) Prediction of hamstring tendon autograft diameter and length for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Orthop 37(3):157–159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Treme G, Diduch DR, Billante MJ et al (2008) Hamstring graft size prediction– a prospective clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 36(11):2204–2209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma BC, Keifa E, Dunn W et al (2010) Can pre-operative measures predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter? Knee 17:81–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaudhri AM, Zelman EA, Flanigan DC et al (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament –injured subjects have smaller anterior cruciate ligaments than matched controls: a magnetic resonance imaging study. American J Sports Med 37(7):1282–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Teli M, Chiodini F, Sottocasa R et al (2005) Influence of the diameters of tendon graft and bone tunnel in hamstring ACL reconstruction. A bovine model. Chir Organi Mov 90(3):281–285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dienst M, Schneider G, Altmeyer K et al (2007) Correlation of intercondylar notch cross sections to ACL size: a high resolution MR tomographic in vivo analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(4):253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson AF, Dome DC, Gautam S et al (2001) Correlation of anthropometric measurements, strength, anterior cruciate ligament size and intercondylar notch characteristics to sex differences in anterior cruciate liagemnt tear rates. Am J Sports Med 29(1):58–66

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Odensten M, Gillquist J (1985) Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and a rationale for reconstruction. J Bone and Joint Surg Am 67:257–262

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller MD [2008]. Review of orthopaedics. 5th edn. Saunders, Elsevier. P-257

  16. Charlton WP, St John TA, Ciccotti MG, Harrison N, Schweitzer M (2002) Differences in femoral notch anatomy between men and women: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med 2002(30):329–333

    Google Scholar 

  17. Muneta T, Takakuda K, Yamamoto H (1997) Intercondylar notch width and its relation to the configuration and cross-sectional area of the anterior cruciate ligament: a cadaveric knee study. Am J Sports Med 25:69–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Handl M, Drzik M, Cerulli G et al (2007) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: dynamic strain evaluation of the graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(3):534–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamner DL, Brown CH, Stiener ME et al (1999) Hamstring tendon graft for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(4):549–557

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interests are stated in the submission of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. North Tyneside Hospital, 5, Meadow Vale, Shiremoor, North Shields, Tyne and Wear, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE27 0BD, UK

    S. Thomas & D. J. Kramer

  2. Imperial College Healthcare NHS, London, UK

    R. Bhattacharya

  3. University Of Teesside, Middlesbrough, UK

    J. B. Saltikov

Authors
  1. S. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Bhattacharya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. B. Saltikov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. J. Kramer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, S., Bhattacharya, R., Saltikov, J.B. et al. Influence of anthropometric features on graft diameter in ACL reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133, 215–218 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1648-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1648-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation