Abstract
A patient with a dual chamber implantable cardioverter–defibrillator developed a defective atrial lead whereupon the generated false atrial signals were repeatedly interpreted as atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation (AF) by the atrial upper rate algorithm coupled with rare episodes of noise reversion. This unusual response highlights the limitations of the upper atrial rate triggers of device diagnosis of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. The converse may occur with a very fine AF or with a very sensitive sensitivity setting (e. g., 0.1 mV) when AF can be detected as noise.
Zusammenfassung
Ein Patient mit einem Zweikammer-ICD (implantierbaren Kardioverter-Defibrillator) entwickelte einen atrialen Elektrodendefekt. Das dadurch verursachte Artefakt wurde vom Gerät wiederholt als atriale Tachykardie bzw. Vorhofflimmern interpretiert, nur in seltenen Fällen als Störsignal. Diese ungewöhnliche Reaktion unterstreicht die Limitationen der Erkennung von supraventrikulären Tachykardien oberhalb der oberen Grenzfrequenz durch automatische Algorithmen. Umgekehrt kann sehr hochfrequentes Vorhofflimmern bei sehr empfindlicher Einstellung (z. B. 0,1 mV) als Störgeräusch fehlklassizifiziert werden.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Bradycardia and Tachycardia Devices. Merlin™ Patient Care System. St Jude Medical, Sylmar, California. 2015.
Filtered Atrial Rate Interval (FARI). Technical insight. St Jude Medical, Sylmar, California. November 2015.
Bradycardia and Tachycardia Devices. Merlin™ Patient Care System (see comment #1).
Rate-Responsive PVARP – High. The new API!. Endurity™, Assurity™, and Allure™. Technical insight. St Jude Medical, Sylmar, California. September 2014.
References
Chen-Scarabelli C, Scarabelli TM, Ellenbogen KA, Halperin JL (2015) Device-detected atrial fibrillation: what to with asymptomatic patients? J Am Coll Cardiol 65:281–294
Bradycardia, Manual TDMPCSH (2010) St Jude Med Cardiac Rhythm Manag Div Sylmar Ca 91342
Barold SS, Stroobandt RX (2012) Erroneous automatic pacemaker arrhythmia diagnosis: is it malfunction or a design limitation? Heart Rhythm 9:998–1001
Barold SS, Stroobandt RX (2012) Atrial lead malfunction presenting as new onset pacemaker-mediated tachycardia. Europace 14:1060–1061
Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, Israel CW, Van Gelder IC, Capucci A et al (2012) ASSERT Investigators. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med 366:120–129
Kohno R, Abe H, Oginosawa Y, Tamura M, Takeuchi M, Nagatomo T et al (2011) Reliability and characteristics of atrial tachyarrhythmias detection in dual chamber pacemakers. Circ J 75:1090–1097
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
S. Serge Barold and F. Van Heuverswyn declare that they have no competing interests.
The accompanying manuscript does not include studies on humans or animals.
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00399-017-0496-0.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Serge Barold, S., Van Heuverswyn, F. Noise from a dysfunctional atrial lead detected as atrial fibrillation by a cardiac implantable electronic device. Herzschr Elektrophys 27, 326–328 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-016-0435-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-016-0435-5
Keywords
- Atrial fibrillation
- Fractured atrial lead
- Implantable cardioverter–defibrillator
- Noise reversion
- Atrial arrhythmia