Skip to main content
Log in

Glycemic potency of muffins made with wheat, rice, corn, oat and barley flours: a comparative study between in vivo and in vitro

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
European Journal of Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Muffins made with wheat flour are a popular snack consumed in western and emerging countries. This study aimed to examine the content of amylose, glycemic response (GR) and glycemic index (GI) of muffins baked with refined wheat and rice flours, as well as wholegrain corn, oat and barley flours.

Methods

This study adopted a randomized, controlled, crossover, non-blind design. Twelve healthy participants consumed wheat, rice, corn, oat and barley muffins once and the reference glucose solution three times in a random order on non-consecutive day. Capillary blood samples were taken every 15 min in the first 60 min and every 30 min for the remaining 60 min for blood glucose analysis. The Megazyme amylose/amylopectin assay procedure was employed to measure amylose content.

Results

The GR elicited from the consumption of wheat, rice and corn muffins was comparable between these samples but significantly greater when compared with oat and barley muffins. Consumption of wholegrain muffins, apart from corn muffin, blunted postprandial GR when compared with muffins baked with refined cereal flours. Muffins baked with wheat, rice, corn, oat and barley flours gave rise to GI values of 74, 79, 74, 53 and 55, respectively. The content of amylose was significantly higher in corn, oat and barley muffins than wheat and rice muffins.

Conclusions

The greater content of amylose and fibre may play a part in the reduced glycemic potency of oat and barley muffins. Wheat flour can be substituted with oat and barley flours for healthier muffins and other bakery products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh J, Dartois A, Kaur L (2010) Starch digestibility in food matrix: a review. Trends Food Sci Tech 21:168–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Salmerón J, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Wing AL, Willett WC (1997) Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA 277:472–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Soong YY, Tan SP, Leong LP, Henry JK (2014) Total antioxidant capacity and starch digestibility of muffins baked with rice, wheat, oat, corn and barley flour. Food Chem 164:462–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Englyst KN, Englyst HN, Hudson GJ, Cole TJ, Cummings JH (1999) Rapidly available glucose in foods: an in vitro measurement that reflects the glycemic response. Am J Clin Nutr 69:448–454

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Henry CJ, Ranawana V (2012) Sugar: a problem of developed countries. Nature 482:471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ludwig DS (2002) The glycemic index: physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. JAMA 287:2414–2423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baecke JA, Burema J, Frijters JE (1982) A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr 36:936–942

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brouns F, Bjorck I, Frayn KN, Gibbs AL, Lang V, Slama G et al (2005) Glycaemic index methodology. Nutr Res Rev 18:145–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. FAO WHO (1998) Carbohydrates in human nutrition—report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stork AD, Kemperman H, Erkelens DW, Veneman TF (2005) Comparison of the accuracy of the HemoCue glucose analyzer with the yellow springs instrument glucose oxidase analyzer, particularly in hypoglycemia. Eur J Endocrinol 153:275–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolever TMS (2006) The glycaemic index: a physiological classification of dietary carbohydrate. CABI, Oxfordshire

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Monro JA, Mishra S, Venn B (2010) Baselines representing blood glucose clearance improve in vitro prediction of the glycemic impact of customarily consumed food quantities. Br J Nutr 103:295–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Regand A, Chowdhury Z, Tosh SM, Wolever T, Wood P (2011) The molecular weight, solubility and viscosity of oat beta-glucan affect human glycemic response by modifying starch digestibility. Food Chem 129:297–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Banchathanaki R, Suphantharika M (2009) Effect of different β-glucans on the gelatinisation and retrogradation of rice starch. Food Chem 114:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Parada J, Aguilera JM (2009) In vitro digestibility and glycemic response of potato starch is related to granule size and degree of gelatinization. J Food Sci 74:E34–E38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Viebke C, Al-Assaf S, Phillips GO (2014) Food hydrocolloids and health claims. Bioact Carbohydr Diet Fibre 4:101–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chung SY, Lee SW, Rhee C (2011) Effects of various Maillard reaction products on in vitro starch hydrolysis and blood glucose responses in mice. Starch-Stärke 63:443–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Langworthy CF, Deuel HJ (1922) Digestibility of raw rice, arrowroot, canna, cassava, taro, tree-fern, and potato starches. J Biol Chem 52:251–261

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. van de Velde F, van Riel J, Tromp RH (2002) Visualisation of starch granule morphologies using confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM). J Sci Food Agric 82:1528–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hargrove JL, Greenspan P, Hartle DK, Dowd C (2011) Inhibition of aromatase and α-amylase by flavonoids and proanthocyanidins from Sorghum bicolor bran extracts. J Med Food 14:799–807

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for the study was provided by the Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, A*Star.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yean Yean Soong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soong, Y.Y., Quek, R.Y.C. & Henry, C.J. Glycemic potency of muffins made with wheat, rice, corn, oat and barley flours: a comparative study between in vivo and in vitro. Eur J Nutr 54, 1281–1285 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-014-0806-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-014-0806-9

Keywords

Navigation