Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stenting in malignant colonic obstruction—is it a real therapeutic option?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Malignant colonic obstruction is commonly treated surgically. Colonic stents are a therapeutic option for palliation or used as a bridge to surgery or chemotherapy.

Objective

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical success rate of stenting as a bridge to one-step surgery, chemotherapy, or as a palliative measure.

Design

This was a retrospective observational study.

Settings

The study was conducted at a university-affiliated tertiary referral center.

Patients and interventions

From 2007 to 2014, 45 patients with malignant colonic obstruction were referred for stent insertion.

Main outcome measures

Patients were grouped according to three pre-defined treatment goals: group 1: restorative one-step procedure without an ostomy, group 2: completion of scheduled chemotherapy before surgery, and group 3: palliation without surgical intervention.

Results

Group 1 included 11 patients. Three patients (27.3 %) met the treatment goal of one-step surgery. Eight patients (72.7 %) did not reach the primary goal due to stent insertion failure (four patients), stent-related complications (two patients), and failure to perform a one-step surgery after successful stent insertion (two patients). Group 2 included 12 patients. Chemotherapy was successfully completed prior to surgery in six patients (50 %). Six patients (50 %) did not achieve treatment goal due to stent insertion failure (two patients), stent migration (two patients), stent-related perforation (one patient), and mortality (one patient). Group 3 included 20 patients. Long-term palliation without surgical intervention was achieved in eight patients (40 %). Stent insertion failed in seven patients (35 %). Five patients (25 %) needed urgent surgery due to stent complications (three migrations and two perforations).

Limitations

The study was limited by its retrospective nature and small sample size.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates only a modest success rate of colonic stents in the treatment of malignant colonic obstruction. Although colonic stenting seems to be an effective method of relieving colonic obstruction, high failure rates limits its applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sagar J (2011) Colorectal stents for the management of malignant colonic obstructions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11

  2. Breitenstein S et al (2007) Systematic evaluation of surgical strategies for acute malignant left-sided colonic obstruction. Br J Surg 94(12):1451–1460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mainar A et al (1996) Colorectal obstruction: treatment with metallic stents. Radiology 198(3):761–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tejero E et al (1994) New procedure for the treatment of colorectal neoplastic obstructions. Dis Colon Rectum 37(11):1158–1159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baron TH et al (1998) Expandable metal stents for the treatment of colonic obstruction: techniques and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 47(3):277–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cennamo V et al (2009) Does stent placement for advanced colon cancer increase the risk of perforation during bevacizumab-based therapy? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(11):1174–1176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fernandez-Esparrach G et al (2010) Severe complications limit long-term clinical success of self-expanding metal stents in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 105(5):1087–1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tan CJ, Dasari BV, Gardiner K (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of self-expanding metallic stents as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 99(4):469–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Martinez-Santos C et al (2002) Self-expandable stent before elective surgery vs. emergency surgery for the treatment of malignant colorectal obstructions: comparison of primary anastomosis and morbidity rates. Dis Colon Rectum 45(3):401–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kavanagh DO et al (2013) A comparative study of short- and medium-term outcomes comparing emergent surgery and stenting as a bridge to surgery in patients with acute malignant colonic obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 56(4):433–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van Hooft JE et al (2007) Colonic stenting as bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for management of acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter randomized trial (Stent-in 2 study). BMC Surg 7:12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pirlet IA et al (2011) Emergency preoperative stenting versus surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 25(6):1814–1821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sabbagh C et al (2013) Is stenting as “a bridge to surgery” an oncologically safe strategy for the management of acute, left-sided, malignant, colonic obstruction? A comparative study with a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg 258(1):107–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Faragher IG, Chaitowitz IM, Stupart DA (2008) Long-term results of palliative stenting or surgery for incurable obstructing colon cancer. Colorectal Dis 10(7):668–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jung MK et al (2010) Factors associated with the long-term outcome of a self-expandable colon stent used for palliation of malignant colorectal obstruction. Surg Endosc 24(3):525–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vemulapalli R et al (2010) A comparison of palliative stenting or emergent surgery for obstructing incurable colon cancer. Dig Dis Sci 55(6):1732–1737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee HJ et al (2011) Long-term outcome of palliative therapy for malignant colorectal obstruction in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancers: endoscopic stenting versus surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 73(3):535–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Karoui M et al (2007) Stents for palliation of obstructive metastatic colon cancer: impact on management and chemotherapy administration. Arch Surg 142(7):619–623, discussion 623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fuccio L, Cennamo V (2010) Bevacizumab-based therapy and complication risk after colonic stent placement: is it time for a warning? Gastrointest Endosc 72(6):1330, author reply 1330-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Small AJ, Coelho-Prabhu N, Baron TH (2010) Endoscopic placement of self-expandable metal stents for malignant colonic obstruction: long-term outcomes and complication factors. Gastrointest Endosc 71(3):560–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Halsema EE et al (2014) Perforation in colorectal stenting: a meta-analysis and a search for risk factors. Gastrointest Endosc 79(6):970–82.e7, quiz 983.e2, 983.e5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Moshe Rubin, M.D. for his assistance and valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron Shapiro.

Additional information

Nir Horesh and Joseph Dux contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horesh, N., Dux, J.Y., Nadler, M. et al. Stenting in malignant colonic obstruction—is it a real therapeutic option?. Int J Colorectal Dis 31, 131–135 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2375-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2375-7

Keywords

Navigation