Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term effects of a regional care pathway for patients with rectal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Introducing care pathways is seen as a method to realise patient-focussed care conform evidence-based guidelines. The goal of this study is to determine the long-term effects of a regional care pathway for patients with rectal cancer.

Patients and methods

Data on almost 400 patients with rectal carcinoma from three hospitals were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. Results on seven structure and process indicators were analysed and compared before and at two time points after implementing a regional care pathway over a total period from 2007 to 2012. To determine motivation and interpret the results, relevant professionals of the participating hospitals were interviewed.

Results

After implementing the care pathway, the performance of computed tomography (CT) scans in the diagnostic phase significantly improved (p = 0.007/0.07). The number of patients discussed in the preoperative multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting improved significantly (p = <0.001), and after implementing the care pathway, 94 % of the patients were discussed. Further, a significant reduction in time between the first tumour biopsy and the MDT meeting was realised (p = 0.01). Professionals stated that the regional care pathway has led to more clarity about the patient route and more awareness about complying with evidence-based guidelines.

Conclusions

The regional care pathway provided a solid basis for uniforming care, working according evidence-based guidelines and further cooperation on regional level. For mainly the waiting and throughput times, the guidelines and norms had probably a stronger effect on the results than the care pathway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Netherlands Cancer Registry: www.cijfersoverkanker.nl

  2. Una E, López-Lara F (2010) Pilot study of a clinical pathway implementation in rectal cancer. Clin Med Insights Oncol 4:111–115

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Bleser L, Depreitere R, De Waele K, Vanhaecht K, Vlayen J, Sermeus W (2006) Defining pathways. J Nurs Manag 14:553–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith TJ, Hillner BE (2001) Ensuring quality cancer care by the use of clinical practical guidelines and critical pathways. J Clin Oncol 19:2886–2897

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E, Machotta A, Gothe H, Kugler J (2009) The experience of conducting a Cochrane systematic review of the impact of clinical pathways on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Int J Care Pathways 13:62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guzmán-Laura KP, Bolíbar-Ribas I, Alepuz MT, Gonzalez D, Martín M (2011) Impact on patient care time and tumour stage of a program for fast diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 1:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ishiguro S, Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Kobayashi Y, Moriya Y (2008) Effect of a clinical pathway after laparoscopic surgery of colorectal cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterology 55:1315–1319

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Currie AC, Evans J, Smith NJ, Brown G, Abulafi AM, Swift RI (2012) The impact of the two-week wait referral pathway on rectal cancer survival. Colorectal Dis 7:848–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Hoeve JC, Elferink MAG, Klaase JM, Eddes EH, Woutersen DP, Holtkamp CCM (2012) Regionaal zorgpad leidt tot verbeteringen in de zorg voor patiënten met rectumcarcinoom. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Oncologie 7:311–318 (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing: www.clinicalaudit.nl

  11. Van Hoeve J, De Munck L, Otter R, De Vries J, Siesling S (2014) Quality improvement by implementing an integrated oncological care pathway for breast cancer patients. The Breast 23:364–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van der Geest LG, Elferink MA, Steup WH, Witte AM, Nortier JW, Tollenaar RA, Struikmans H (2014) Guidelines-based diagnostic process does increase hospital delay in a cohort of colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. Eur J Cancer Prev 23:344–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the registration team of IKNL for the collection of data for the NCR as well as all professionals who contributed to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jolanda C. van Hoeve.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Hoeve, J.C., Elferink, M.A.G., Klaase, J.M. et al. Long-term effects of a regional care pathway for patients with rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 30, 787–795 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2209-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2209-7

Keywords

Navigation