Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Importance of postpolypectomy surveillance and postpolypectomy compliance to follow-up screening—review of literature

  • Review
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Approximately 150,000 people are diagnosed with colorectal cancer each year and 56,000 may die from it annually in the United States. Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the USA and yet, when diagnosed at an early stage, it is one of the most preventable cancers. According to the US Preventive Services Task Force, initial screening for colorectal cancer is recommended in people above 50 years of age with average risk and earlier in people with a strong family history and other risk factors. Adenomatous polyps are considered as precursors of colorectal cancer. Removal of polyps and postpolypectomy surveillance reduces the overall mortality from colorectal cancer.

Discussion

According to updated guidelines in 2006, a 3-year-follow-up colonoscopy is recommended in patients with adenomatous polyps ≥1 cm. An important factor in the surveillance and prevention of colorectal cancer in postpolypectomy patients is compliance with follow-up colonoscopy. In the present article, we provide an overview of the importance of postpolypectomy surveillance and summarize the compliance data for postpolypectomy surveillance. Compliance to postpolypectomy surveillance varies from one study to another and it should be expected that the compliance with follow-up would be low outside of clinical trials. Some measures that can improve patient compliance include patient education regarding a need of follow-up screening, reminder letters, and alerts in patient’s charts.

Conclusion

In conclusion, effective surveillance screening with good patient compliance in postpolypectomy patients will contribute significantly in reducing colon cancer morbidity and mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M (2001) Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin 51:15–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, Thun MJ (2006) Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J.Clin 56:106–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF (2002) Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age. N Engl J Med 346:1781–1785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Levin B, Smith RA, Feldman GE, Colditz GA, Fletcher RH, Nadel M, Rothenberger DA, Schroy PS III, Vernon SW, Wender R (2002) Promoting early detection tests for colorectal carcinoma and adenomatous polyps: a framework for action: the strategic plan of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Cancer 95:1618–1628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC (1975) The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 36:2251–2270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morson BC (1984) The evolution of colorectal carcinoma. Clin Radiol 35:425–431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, Libbe SD, Ilstrup DM, MacCarty RL (1987) Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 93:1009–1013

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, Waye JD, Kronborg O, Bond J, Fruhmorgen P, Sobin LH, Burt R, Zauber A, Morson B (1990) Risk and surveillance of individuals with colorectal polyps. WHO Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. Bull World Health Organ 68:789–795

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson BA (1999) Flexible sigmoidoscopy: screening for colorectal cancer. Am Fam Physician 59:1537–1546

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Connell JB, Maggard MA, Ko CY (2004) Colon cancer survival rates with the new American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition staging. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1420–1425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, Ho MN, Gottlieb L, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Bond J, Schapiro M, Stewart ET et al (1993) Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 328:901–906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Avidan B, Sonnenberg A, Schnell TG, Leya J, Metz A, Sontag SJ (2002) New occurrence and recurrence of neoplasms within 5 years of a screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1524–1529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Neugut AI, Jacobson JS, Ahsan H, Santos J, Garbowski GC, Forde KA, Treat MR, Waye J (1995) Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas: a prospective study. Gastroenterology 108:402–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Amonkar MM, Hunt TL, Zhou Z, Jin X (2005) Surveillance patterns and polyp recurrence following diagnosis and excision of colorectal polyps in a Medicare population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:417–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yood MU, Oliveria S, Boyer JG, Wells K, Stang P, Johnson CC (2003) Colon polyp recurrence in a managed care population. Arch Intern Med 163:422–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C (1995) A randomized surveillance study of patients with pedunculated and small sessile tubular and tubulovillous adenomas. The Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study. Scand J Gastroenterol 30:686–692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bertario L, Russo A, Sala P, Pizzetti P, Ballardini G, Andreola S, Spinelli P (1999) Risk of colorectal cancer following colonoscopic polypectomy. Tumori 85:157–162

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Blumberg D, Opelka FG, Hicks TC, Timmcke AE, Beck DE (2000) Significance of a normal surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a history of adenomatous polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1084–1091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jonkers D, Ernst J, Pladdet I, Stockbrugger R, Hameeteman W (2006) Endoscopic follow-up of 383 patients with colorectal adenoma: an observational study in daily practice. Eur J Cancer Prev 15:202–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fornasarig M, Valentini M, Poletti M, Carbone A, Bidoli E, Sozzi M, Cannizzaro R (1998) Evaluation of the risk for metachronous colorectal neoplasms following intestinal polypectomy: a clinical, endoscopic and pathological study. Hepatogastroenterology 45:1565–1572

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Neugut AI, Jacobson JS, DeVivo I (1993) Epidemiology of colorectal adenomatous polyps. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2:159–176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Olsen HW, Lawrence WA, Snook CW, Mutch WM (1988) Review of recurrent polyps and cancer in 500 patients with initial colonoscopy for polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 31:222–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmiegel W, Adler G, Fruhmorgen P, Folsch U, Graeven U, Layer P, Petrasch S, Porschen R, Pox C, Sauerbruch T et al (2000) Colorectal carcinoma: prevention and early detection in an asymptomatic population-prevention in patients at risk-endoscopic diagnosis, therapy and after-care of polyps and carcinomas. German Society of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases/Study Group for Gastrointestinal Oncology. Z Gastroenterol 38:49–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O’Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF et al (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, Barcherini S, Crespi M (2001) Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 48:812–815

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J, Langmark F, Majak BM, Vatn MH (1999) Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I. Scand J Gastroenterol 34:414–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J (1992) Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 326:658–662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C (1993) The Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study. Incidence and death from colorectal carcinoma in an adenoma surveillance program. Scand J Gastroenterol 28:869–874

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, Stillman JS, O’Brien MJ, Levin B, Smith RA, Lieberman DA, Burt RW, Levin TR et al (2006) Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 130:1872–1885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Sturmer T, Hoffmeister M (2007) Case-control study supports extension of surveillance interval after colonoscopic polypectomy to at least 5 yr. Am J Gastroenterol 102:1739–1744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bradshaw N, Holloway S, Penman I, Dunlop MG, Porteous ME (2003) Colonoscopy surveillance of individuals at risk of familial colorectal cancer. Gut 52:1748–1751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fuchs CS, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Speizer FE, Willett WC (1994) A prospective study of family history and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 331:1669–1674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jarvinen HJ, Aarnio M, Mustonen H, Aktan-Collan K, Aaltonen LA, Peltomaki P, De La CA, Mecklin JP (2000) Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 118:829–834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lovett E (1976) Family studies in cancer of the colon and rectum. Br J Surg 63:13–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. St John DJ, McDermott FT, Hopper JL, Debney EA, Johnson WR, Hughes ES (1993) Cancer risk in relatives of patients with common colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 118:785–790

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fossi S, Bazzoli F, Ricciardiello L, Nicolini G, Zagari RM, Pozzato P, Palli D, Roda E (2001) Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas in first-degree asymptomatic relatives of patients with colon cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 96:1601–1604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, Godlee F, Stolar MH, Mulrow CD, Woolf SH, Glick SN, Ganiats TG, Bond JH et al (1997) Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 112:594–642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Arvanitis ML, Jagelman DG, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, McGannon E (1990) Mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 33:639–642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Vasen HF, Griffioen G, Offerhaus GJ, Den Hartog Jager FC, Leeuwen-Cornelisse IS, Meera KP, Lamers CB, Van Slooten EA (1990) The value of screening and central registration of families with familial adenomatous polyposis. A study of 82 families in The Netherlands. Dis Colon Rectum 33:227–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Cromwell DM, Moore RD, Brensinger JD, Petersen GM, Bass EB, Giardiello FM (1998) Cost analysis of alternative approaches to colorectal screening in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastroenterology 114:893–901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Brentnall TA, Haggitt RC, Rabinovitch PS, Kimmey MB, Bronner MP, Levine DS, Kowdley KV, Stevens AC, Crispin DA, Emond M et al (1996) Risk and natural history of colonic neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 110:331–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ekbom A, Helmick C, Zack M, Adami HO (1990) Ulcerative colitis and colorectal cancer. A population-based study. N Engl J Med 323:1228–1233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Giovannucci E, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ (1993) A meta-analysis of cholecystectomy and risk of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 105:130–141

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lagergren J, Ye W, Ekbom A (2001) Intestinal cancer after cholecystectomy: is bile involved in carcinogenesis? Gastroenterology 121:542–547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Schernhammer ES, Leitzmann MF, Michaud DS, Speizer FE, Giovannucci E, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS (2003) Cholecystectomy and the risk for developing colorectal cancer and distal colorectal adenomas. Br J Cancer 88:79–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Shao T, Yang YX (2005) Cholecystectomy and the risk of colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 100:1813–1820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Colquhoun P, Chen HC, Kim JI, Efron J, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Vernava AM, Wexner SD (2004) High compliance rates observed for follow up colonoscopy post polypectomy are achievable outside of clinical trials: efficacy of polypectomy is not reduced by low compliance for follow up. Colorectal Dis 6:158–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Lund JN, Scholefield JH, Grainge MJ, Smith SJ, Mangham C, Armitage NC, Robinson MH, Logan RF (2001) Risks, costs, and compliance limit colorectal adenoma surveillance: lessons from a randomised trial. Gut 49:91–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Brueckl WM, Fritsche B, Seifert B, Boxberger F, Albrecht H, Croner RS, Wein A, Hahn EG (2006) Non-compliance in surveillance for patients with previous resection of large (>=1 cm) colorectal adenomas. World J Gastroenterol 12:7313–7318

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mulder SA, Van Leerdam ME, Ouwendijk RJ, Bac DJ, Giard RW, Kuipers EJ (2007) Attendance at surveillance endoscopy of patients with adenoma or colorectal cancer. Scand JGastroenterol 42:66–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Morson BC, Bussey HJ (1985) Magnitude of risk for cancer in patients with colorectal adenomas. Br J Surg 72(Suppl):S23–S25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sanaka MR, Super DM, Feldman ES, Mullen KD, Ferguson DR, McCullough AJ (2006) Improving compliance with postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: an interventional study using a continuous quality improvement initiative. Gastrointest Endosc 63:97–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bastani R, Yabroff KR, Myers RE, Glenn B (2004) Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening. Cancer 101:1188–1200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sri Rapuri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rapuri, S., Spencer, J. & Eckels, D. Importance of postpolypectomy surveillance and postpolypectomy compliance to follow-up screening—review of literature. Int J Colorectal Dis 23, 453–459 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0430-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0430-8

Keywords

Navigation