Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improvement of rainfall simulation on the steep edge of the Tibetan Plateau by using a finite-difference transport scheme in CAM5

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Overestimation of precipitation over steep mountains has been a long-lasting bias in many climate models. After replacing the semi-Lagrangian method with a finite-difference approach for trace transport algorithm (the two-step shape preserving scheme, TSPAS), the modified NCAR CAM5 (M-CAM5) with high horizontal resolution results in a significant improvement of simulation in precipitation over the steep edge of the Tibetan Plateau. The M-CAM5 restrains the “overshoot” of water vapor to the high-altitude region of the windward slopes and significantly reduces the overestimation of precipitation in areas above 2000 m along the southern edge of the Tibetan Plateau. More moisture are left in the low-altitude region on the slope where used to present dry biases in CAM5. The excessive (insufficient) amount of precipitation over the higher (lower) part of the steep slope is partially caused by the multi-grid water vapor transport in CAM5, which leads to spurious accumulation of water vapor at cold and high-altitude grids. Benefited from calculation of transport grid by grid in TSPAS and detailed description of steep mountains by the high-resolution model, M-CAM5 moves water vapor and precipitation downward over windward slopes and presents a more realistic simulation. Results in this study indicate that in addition to the development of physical parameterization schemes, the dynamical process should also be reconsidered in order to improve the climate simulation over steep mountains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alves LM, Marengo J (2010) Assessment of regional seasonal predictability using the precis regional climate modeling system over South America. Theor Appl Climatol 100(3–4):337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton CS, Park S (2009) A new moist turbulence parameterization in the community atmosphere model. J Clim 22(12):3422–3448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codron F, Sadourny R (2002) Saturation limiters for water vapour advection schemes: impact on orographic precipitation. Tellus A 54(4):338–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danard M, Zhang Q, Kozlowski J (1993) On computing the horizontal pressure gradient force in sigma coordinates. Mon Weather Rev 121(11):3173–3183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulizia C, Camilloni I (2014) Comparative analysis of the ability of a set of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models to represent precipitation in South America. Int J Climatol. doi:10.1002/joc.4005

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman GJ, Adler RF, Bolvin DT, Gu G, Nelkin EJ, Bowman KP, Hong Y, Stocker EF, Wolff DB (2007) The TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis (TMPA): quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. J Hydrometeorol 8(1):38–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehran A, AghaKouchak A, Phillips T (2014) Evaluation of CMIP5 continental precipitation simulations relative to satellite-based gauge-adjusted observations. J Geophys Res: Atmos 119(4):1695–1707

    Google Scholar 

  • Mlawer EJ, Taubman SJ, Brown PD, Iacono MJ, Clough SA (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J Geophys Res 102(D14):16,663–16

  • Morrison H, Gettelman A (2008) A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the community atmosphere model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: description and numerical tests. J Clim 21(15):3642–3659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neale RB, Chen C, Gettelman A, Lauritzen P, Park S, Williamson D, Conley A, Garcia R, Kinnison D, Lamarque J, et al. (2010) Description of the ncar community atmosphere model (CAM 5.0). NCAR Tech Note NCAR/TN-486+ STR

  • Park S, Bretherton CS (2009) The University of Washington shallow convection and moist turbulence schemes and their impact on climate simulations with the community atmosphere model. J Clim 22(12):3449–3469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter JH, Rasch PJ (2008) Effects of convective momentum transport on the atmospheric circulation in the community atmosphere model, version 3. J Clim 21(7):1487–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staniforth A, Côté J (1991) Semi-Lagrangian integration schemes for atmospheric models–a review. Mon Weather Rev 119(9):2206–2223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su F, Duan X, Chen D, Hao Z, Cuo L (2013) Evaluation of the global climate models in the CMIP5 over the Tibetan Plateau. J Clim 26(10):3187–3208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao S, Chen L (1987) A review of recent research on the East Asian summer monsoon in China. In: Chang C, Krishnamurti T (eds) Monsoon meteorology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 60–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Lin H (2002) Rainy season of the Asian-Pacific summer monsoon. J Clim 15(4):386–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu L, Zhai P (2012) Validation of daily precipitation from two high-resolution satellite precipitation datasets over the Tibetan Plateau and the regions to its east. Acta Meteorol Sin 6:735–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Gao X, Giorgi F (2010) Upgrades to the reliability ensemble averaging method for producing probabilistic climate-change projections. Clim Res 41(1):61–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu R (1994) A twostep shapepreserving advection scheme. Adv Atmos Sci 11(4):479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GJ, McFarlane NA (1995) Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian Climate Centre general circulation model. Atmos-Ocean 33(3):407–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Yu R, Li J, Chen H (2013) An implementation of a leaping-point Two-step Shape-Preserving Advection Scheme in the high-resolution spherical latitude-longitude grid. Acta Meteorol Sin 71(6):1089–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Two anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged for their thoughtful comments and suggestions. This research was supported by the Major National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) on Global Change under Grant 2010CB951902, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 41221064, 41322034, and the Basic Scientific Research and Operation Foundation of CAMS under Grant No. 2013Z004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, R., Li, J., Zhang, Y. et al. Improvement of rainfall simulation on the steep edge of the Tibetan Plateau by using a finite-difference transport scheme in CAM5. Clim Dyn 45, 2937–2948 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2515-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2515-3

Keywords

Navigation