Abstract
The present study aims to develop a general circulation model (GCM) with improved simulation of heavy precipitation frequency by improving the representations of cloud and rain processes. GCMs with conventional convective parameterizations produce common bias in precipitation frequency: they overestimate light precipitation and underestimate heavy precipitation with respect to observed values. This frequency shift toward light precipitation is attributed here to a lack of consideration of cloud microphysical processes related to heavy precipitation. The budget study of cloud microphysical processes using a cloud-resolving model shows that the melting of graupel and accretion of cloud water by graupel and rain water are important processes in the generation of heavy precipitation. However, those processes are not expressed explicitly in conventional GCMs with convective parameterizations. In the present study, the cloud microphysics is modified to allow its implementation into a GCM with a horizontal resolution of 50 km. The newly developed GCM, which includes explicit cloud microphysics, produces more heavy precipitation and less light precipitation than conventional GCMs, thus simulating a precipitation frequency that is closer to the observed. This study demonstrates that the GCM requires a full representation of cloud microphysics to simulate the extreme precipitation frequency realistically. It is also shown that a coarse-resolution GCM with cloud microphysics requires an additional mixing process in the lower troposphere.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan RP, Soden BJ, John VO, Ingram W, Good P (2010) Current changes in tropical precipitation. Environ Res Lett 5:1–7
Bonan GB (1996) Land surface model (LSM version 1.0) for ecological, hydrological, and atmospheric studies: technical description and user’s guide. NCAR technical note NCAR/TN-417 + STR, pp 1–159
Boyle J, Klein SA (2010) Impact of horizontal resolution on climate model forecasts of tropical precipitation and diabatic heating for the TWP-ICE period. J Geohys Res 115:1–20
Chen C-T, Knutson T (2008) On the verification and comparison of extreme rainfall indices from climate models. J Clim 21:1605–1621
Ciesielski PE, Johnson RH, Haertel PT, Wang J (2003) Corrected TOGA COARE sounding humidity data: impact on diagnosed properties of convection and climate over the warm pool. J Clim 16:2370–2384
Dai A (2006) Precipitation characteristics in eighteen coupled climate models. J Clim 19:4605–4630
DeMott CA, Randall DA, Khairoutdinov M (2007) Convective precipitation variability as a tool for general circulation model analysis. J Clim 20:91–112
Durman C, Gregory J, Hassell D, Jones R, Murphy J (2001) A comparison of extreme European daily precipitation simulated by a global and a regional climate model for present and future climates. Q J R Meteorol Soc 127:1005–1015
Gregory D (2001) Estimation of entrainment rate in simple models of convective clouds. Q J R Meteorol Soc 127:53–72
Holtslag A, Boville B (1993) Local versus nonlocal boundary-layer diffusion in a global climate model. J Clim 6:1825–1842
Huffman GJ, Adler RF, Bolvin DT, Gu G, Nelkin EJ, Bowman KP, Hong Y, Stocker EF, Wolff DB (2007) The TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis (TMPA): quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. J Hydrometeorol 8:38–55
Iorio J, Duffy P, Govindasamy B, Thompson S, Khairoutdinov M, Randall D (2004) Effects of model resolution and subgrid-scale physics on the simulation of precipitation in the continental United States. Clim Dyn 23:243–258
Khairoutdinov MF, Randall DA (2003) Cloud resolving modeling of the ARM summer 1997 IOP: model formulation, results, uncertainties, and sensitivities. J Atmos Sci 60:607–625
Kharin VV, Zwiers FW, Zhang X, Hegerl GC (2007) Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the IPCC ensemble of global coupled model simulations. J Clim 20:1419–1444
Kim D, Kang I-S (2012) A bulk mass flux convection scheme for climate model: description and moisture sensitivity. Clim Dyn 38:411–429
Kim D, Sobel AH, Maloney ED, Frierson DM, Kang I-S (2011) A systematic relationship between intraseasonal variability and mean state bias in AGCM simulations. J Clim 24:5506–5520
Klemp JB, Wilhelmson RB (1978) The simulation of three-dimensional convective storm dynamics. J Atmos Sci 35:1070–1096
Lau WKM, Wu HT, Kim KM (2013) A canonical response of precipitation characteristics to global warming from CMIP5 models. Geophys Res Lett 40:3163–3169
Le Treut H, Li Z-X (1991) Sensitivity of an atmospheric general circulation model to prescribed SST changes: feedback effects associated with the simulation of cloud optical properties. Clim Dyn 5:175–187
Lee M-I, Kang I-S, Kim JK, Mapes BE (2001) Influence of cloud-radiation interaction on simulating tropical intraseasonal oscillation with an atmospheric general circulation model. J Geophys Res 106:14219–14233
Lee M-I, Kang I-S, Mapes BE (2003) Impacts of cumulus convection parameterization on aqua-planet AGCM simulations of tropical intraseasonal variability. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 81:963–992
Li F, Collins WD, Wehner MF, Williamson DL, Olson JG (2011a) Response of precipitation extremes to idealized global warming in an aqua-planet climate model: towards a robust projection across different horizontal resolutions. Tellus A 63:876–883
Li F, Collins WD, Wehner MF, Williamson DL, Olson JG, Algieri C (2011b) Impact of horizontal resolution on simulation of precipitation extremes in an aqua-planet version of community atmospheric model (CAM3). Tellus A 63:884–892
Li F, Rosa D, Collins WD, Wehner MF (2012) “Super-parameterization”: a better way to simulate regional extreme precipitation? J Adv Model Earth Syst 4:1–10
Lin Y-L, Farley RD, Orville HD (1983) Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J Clim Appl Meteorol 22:1065–1092
Lin X, Randall DA, Fowler LD (2000) Diurnal variability of the hydrologic cycle and radiative fluxes: comparisons between observations and a GCM. J Clim 13:4159–4179
Liu C, Ikeda K, Thompson G, Rasmussen R, Dudhia J (2011) High-resolution simulations of wintertime precipitation in the Colorado Headwaters region: sensitivity to physics parameterizations. Mon Weather Rev 139:3533–3553
Liu C, Allan RP, Huffman GJ (2012) Co-variation of temperature and precipitation in CMIP5 models and satellite observations. Geophys Res Lett 39:1–8
Lorant V, McFarlane NA, Scinocca JF (2006) Variability of precipitation intensity: sensitivity to treatment of moist convection in an RCM and a GCM. Clim Dyn 26:183–200
Mapes B, Neale R (2011) Parameterizing convective organization to escape the entrainment dilemma. J Adv Model Earth Syst 3:1–20
Min S-K, Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Hegerl GC (2011) Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature 470:378–381
Nakajima T, Tsukamoto M, Tsushima Y, Numaguti A (1995) Modelling of the radiative processes in an AGCM. Clim Syst Dyn Model 3:104–123
O’Gorman PA, Schneider T (2009) The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:14773–14777
Pan DM, Randall DD (1998) A cumulus parameterization with a prognostic closure. Q J R Meteorol Soc 124:949–981
Satoh M, Tomita H, Miura H, Iga S, Nasuno T (2005) Development of a global cloud resolving model-a multi-scale structure of tropical convections. J Earth Simul 3:11–19
Scinocca JF, McFarlane NA (2004) The variability of modeled tropical precipitation. J Atmos Sci 61:1993–2015
Scoccimarro E, Gualdi S, Zampieri M, Bellucci A, Navarra A (2013) Heavy precipitation events in a warmer climate: results from CMIP5 models. J Clim 26:7902–7911
Su H, Jiang JH, Vane DG, Stephens GL (2008) Observed vertical structure of tropical oceanic clouds sorted in large-scale regimes. Geophys Res Lett 35:1–6
Sun Y, Solomon S, Dai A, Portmann RW (2006) How often does it rain? J Clim 19:916–934
Sun F, Roderick ML, Farquhar GD (2012) Changes in the variability of global land precipitation. Geophys Res Lett 39:1–6
Tao W-K, Simpson J, Baker D, Braun S, Chou M-D, Ferrier B, Johnson D, Khain A, Lang S, Lynn B (2003) Microphysics, radiation and surface processes in the Goddard Cumulus Ensemble (GCE) model. Meteorol Atmos Phys 82:97–137
Tiedtke M (1984) Sensitivity of the time-mean large-scale flow to cumulus convection in the ECMWF model. pp 297–316
Tiedtke M (1989) A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulusparameterization in large-scale models. Mon Weather Rev 117:1779–1800
Tokioka T (1988) The equatorial 30–60 day oscillation and the Arakawa–Schubert penetrative cumulus parameterization. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 66:883–901
Wang W, Schlesinger ME (1999) The dependence on convection parameterization of the tropical intraseasonal oscillation simulated by the UIUC 11-layer atmospheric GCM. J Clim 12:1423–1457
Webster PJ, Lukas R (1992) TOGA COARE: the coupled ocean-atmosphere response experiment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 73:1377–1416
Wehner MF, Smith RL, Bala G, Duffy P (2010) The effect of horizontal resolution on simulation of very extreme US precipitation events in a global atmosphere model. Clim Dyn 34:241–247
Wilcox EM, Donner LJ (2007) The frequency of extreme rain events in satellite rain-rate estimates and an atmospheric general circulation model. J Clim 20:53–69
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MEST) (NRF-2012M1A2A2671775) and by the Brain Korea 21 Plus. Wei-Kuo Tao was supported by the NASA Precipitation Measurement Missions (PMM), the NASA Modeling, Analysis, and Prediction (MAP) Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kang, IS., Yang, YM. & Tao, WK. GCMs with implicit and explicit representation of cloud microphysics for simulation of extreme precipitation frequency. Clim Dyn 45, 325–335 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2376-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2376-1