Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Advantage of Catcher’s mask cranioplasty for post-surgical infectious skin trouble

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

We report the case of a patient with repeated intractable cranioplasty infections who was successfully treated by partially removing the graft after Catcher’s mask cranioplasty.

Materials and methods

Aside from the cost of cranial artificial implants, our simple method saves the cost of subsequent removal and implantation surgeries in the process of cranioplasty trouble shooting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asai S, Kamei Y, Torii S (2004) One-stage reconstruction of infected cranial defects using a titanium mesh plate enclosed in an omental flap. Ann Plast Surg 52:144–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Auguste KI, McDermott MW (2006) Salvage of infected craniotomy bone flaps with the wash-in, wash-out indwelling antibiotic irrigation system. Technical note and case series of 12 patients. J Neurosurg 105:640–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng YK, Weng HH, Yang JT, Lee MH, Wang TC, Chang CN (2008) Factors affecting graft infection after cranioplasty. J Clin Neurosci 15:1115–1119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hayward RD (1999) Cranioplasty: don’t forget the patient’s own bone is cheaper than titanium. Br J Neurosurg 13:490–491

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Psillakis JM, Grotting JC, Casanova R (1986) Vascularized outer-table calvarial bone flaps. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 78:309–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Takumi I, Akimoto M (2008) Catcher’s mask cranioplasty for extensive cranial defects in children with an open head trauma: a novel application of partial cranioplasty. Childs Nerv Syst 24:927–932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tessier P, Kawamoto H, Matthews D, Posnick J, Raulo Y, Tulasne JF, Wolfe SA (2005) Taking long rib grafts for facial reconstruction–tools and techniques: III. A 2900-case experience in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:38S–46S discussion 92S–94S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tessier P, Kawamoto H, Posnick J, Raulo Y, Tulasne JF, Wolfe SA (2005) Taking calvarial grafts, either split in situ or splitting of the parietal bone flap ex vivo–tools and techniques: V. A 9650-case experience in craniofacial and maxillofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:54S–71S discussion 92S–94S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamaura A, Makino H (1977) Neurological deficits in the presence of the sinking skin flap following decompressive craniectomy. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 17:43–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Mitsui Life Social Welfare Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masataka Akimoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takumi, I., Akimoto, M. Advantage of Catcher’s mask cranioplasty for post-surgical infectious skin trouble. Childs Nerv Syst 25, 493–495 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-008-0793-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-008-0793-3

Keywords

Navigation