Abstract
Introduction
We report the case of a patient with repeated intractable cranioplasty infections who was successfully treated by partially removing the graft after Catcher’s mask cranioplasty.
Materials and methods
Aside from the cost of cranial artificial implants, our simple method saves the cost of subsequent removal and implantation surgeries in the process of cranioplasty trouble shooting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asai S, Kamei Y, Torii S (2004) One-stage reconstruction of infected cranial defects using a titanium mesh plate enclosed in an omental flap. Ann Plast Surg 52:144–147
Auguste KI, McDermott MW (2006) Salvage of infected craniotomy bone flaps with the wash-in, wash-out indwelling antibiotic irrigation system. Technical note and case series of 12 patients. J Neurosurg 105:640–644
Cheng YK, Weng HH, Yang JT, Lee MH, Wang TC, Chang CN (2008) Factors affecting graft infection after cranioplasty. J Clin Neurosci 15:1115–1119
Hayward RD (1999) Cranioplasty: don’t forget the patient’s own bone is cheaper than titanium. Br J Neurosurg 13:490–491
Psillakis JM, Grotting JC, Casanova R (1986) Vascularized outer-table calvarial bone flaps. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 78:309–317
Takumi I, Akimoto M (2008) Catcher’s mask cranioplasty for extensive cranial defects in children with an open head trauma: a novel application of partial cranioplasty. Childs Nerv Syst 24:927–932
Tessier P, Kawamoto H, Matthews D, Posnick J, Raulo Y, Tulasne JF, Wolfe SA (2005) Taking long rib grafts for facial reconstruction–tools and techniques: III. A 2900-case experience in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:38S–46S discussion 92S–94S
Tessier P, Kawamoto H, Posnick J, Raulo Y, Tulasne JF, Wolfe SA (2005) Taking calvarial grafts, either split in situ or splitting of the parietal bone flap ex vivo–tools and techniques: V. A 9650-case experience in craniofacial and maxillofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:54S–71S discussion 92S–94S
Yamaura A, Makino H (1977) Neurological deficits in the presence of the sinking skin flap following decompressive craniectomy. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 17:43–53
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Mitsui Life Social Welfare Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takumi, I., Akimoto, M. Advantage of Catcher’s mask cranioplasty for post-surgical infectious skin trouble. Childs Nerv Syst 25, 493–495 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-008-0793-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-008-0793-3