Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of mitral competence after mitral repair with papillary muscle approximation versus papillary muscle relocation for functional mitral regurgitation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical results of papillary muscle approximation (PMA) and papillary muscle relocation (PMR) for functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and to compare the effects of both procedures on the change in mitral regurgitation (MR) and echocardiogram parameters associated with tethering. Eighteen patients with moderate-to-severe FMR (MR grade ≥2) who underwent PMA or PMR were retrospectively analyzed. Underlying diseases were ischemic cardiomyopathy, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, and aortic valve disease for seven, six, and five patients, respectively. Eleven patients underwent PMA and seven patients underwent PMR. Mitral annuloplasty and surgical ventricular restoration were performed concomitantly for 18 and 6 patients, respectively. None of these patients died in the hospital. Three patients died during the late period; two of these deaths were cardiac related. The rate of 3 years of freedom from cardiac-related death was 89%. After a mean follow-up of 33 months, MR grade was significantly improved compared with preoperative values (3.0 ± 0.8 to 0.7 ± 1.2; p < 0.01). Recurrence of MR grade ≥2 occurred in three patients and the rate of 3 years of freedom from recurrence of MR grade ≥2 was 87%. During follow-up, tenting height (1.1 ± 0.2 to 0.7 ± 0.2 cm; p < 0.01), tenting area (2.2 ± 0.7 to 0.9 ± 0.5 cm2; p < 0.01), and anterior leaflet tethering angle (39° ± 11° to 26° ± 8°; p < 0.01) were significantly improved compared with preoperative values. Posterior leaflet tethering angle significantly deteriorated from 40° ± 7° to 53° ± 15° (p < 0.01); however, it did not further deteriorate compared with the early postoperative value of 55° ± 16° (p = 0.7). There was no difference in echocardiogram parameters associated with tethering between PMA and PMR throughout the observation period. Both methods were associated with lasting relief of MR and reverse left ventricular remodeling. There was no difference between PMA and PMR regarding the effect on mitral valve competence. Both methods allowed durable mitral repair and good clinical outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nicolini F, Agostinelli A, Vezzani A, Molardi A, Benassi F, Gallingani A, Romano G, Gherli T (2015) Surgical treatment for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation: current options and future trends. Acta Biomed 86:17–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Otsuji Y, Levine RA, Takeuchi M, Sakata R, Tei C (2008) Mechanism of ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Cardiol 51:145–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaneko H, Suzuki S, Uejima T, Kano H, Matsuno S, Otsuka T, Takai H, Oikawa Y, Yajima J, Koike A, Nagashima K, Kirigaya H, Sagara K, Tanabe H, Sawada H, Aizawa T, Yamashita T (2014) Prevalence and the long-term prognosis of functional mitral regurgitation in Japanese patients with symptomatic heart failure. Heart Vessels 29:801–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bolling SF, Deeb GM, Brunsting LA, Bach DS (1995) Early outcome of mitral valve reconstruction in patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 109:676–683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nair RU, Williams SG, Nwafor KU, Hall AS, Tan LB (2001) Left ventricular volume reduction without ventriculectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 71:2046–2049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hvass U, Tapia M, Baron F, Pouzet B, Shafy A (2003) Papillary muscle sling: a new functional approach to mitral repair in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and functional mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg 75:809–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Matsui Y, Suto Y, Shimura S, Fukada Y, Naito Y, Yasuda K, Sasaki S (2005) Impact of papillary muscles approximation on the adequacy of mitral coaptation in functional mitral regurgitation due to dilated cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 11:164–171

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nappi F, Lusini M, Spadaccio C, Nenna A, Covino E, Acar C, Chello M (2016) Papillary muscle approximation versus restrictive annuloplasty alone for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 67:2334–2346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kron IL, Green GR, Cope JT (2002) Surgical relocation of the posterior papillary muscle in chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg 74:600–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Langer F, Kunihara T, Hell K, Schramm R, Schmidt KI, Aicher D, Kindermann M, Schäfers HJ (2009) RING + STRING: successful repair technique for ischemic mitral regurgitation with severe leaflet tethering. Circulation 120(11 Suppl):S85–S91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fattouch K, Lancellotti P, Castrovinci S, Murana G, Sampognaro R, Corrado E, Caruso M, Speziale G, Novo S, Ruvolo G (2012) Papillary muscle relocation in conjunction with valve annuloplasty improve repair results in severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143:1352–1355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Varennes B, Chaturvedi R, Sidhu S, Côté AV, Shan WL, Goyer C, Hatzakorzian R, Buithieu J, Sniderman A (2009) Initial results of posterior leaflet extension for severe type IIIb ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation 119:2837–2843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Borger MA, Murphy PM, Alam A, Fazel S, Maganti M, Armstrong S, Rao V, David TE (2007) Initial results of the chordal-cutting operation for ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133:1483–1492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ciarka A, Braun J, Delgado V, Versteegh M, Boersma E, Klautz R, Dion R, Bax JJ, Van de Veire N (2010) Predictors of mitral regurgitation recurrence in patients with heart failure undergoing mitral valve annuloplasty. Am J Cardiol 106:395–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu F, Otsuji Y, Yotsumoto G, Yuasa T, Ueno T, Yu B, Koriyama C, Hamasaki S, Biro S, Kisanuki A, Minagoe S, Levine RA, Sakata R, Tei C (2005) Mechanism of persistent ischemic mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty: importance of augmented posterior mitral leaflet tethering. Circulation 112(9 Suppl):I396–I401

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roshanali F, Mandegar MH, Yousefnia MA, Rayatzadeh H, Alaeddini F (2007) A prospective study of predicting factors in ischemic mitral regurgitation recurrence after ring annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 84:745–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Komeda M, Koyama Y, Fukaya S, Kitamura H (2012) Papillary heads “optimization” in repairing functional mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:1262–1264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Magne J, Sénéchal M, Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P (2009) Ischemic mitral regurgitation: a complex multifaceted disease. Cardiology 112:244–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldstein D, Moskowitz AJ, Gelijns AC, Ailawadi G, Parides MK, Perrault LP, Hung JW, Voisine P, Dagenais F, Gillinov AM, Thourani V, Argenziano M, Gammie JS, Mack M, Demers P, Atluri P, Rose EA, O’Sullivan K, Williams DL, Bagiella E, Michler RE, Weisel RD, Miller MA, Geller NL, Taddei-Peters WC, Smith PK, Moquete E, Overbey JR, Kron IL, O’Gara PT, Acker MA, CTSN (2016) Two-year outcomes of surgical treatment of severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 374:344–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Salmasi MY, Acharya M, Humayun N, Baskaran D, Hubbard S, Vohra H (2016) Is valve repair preferable to valve replacement in ischaemic mitral regurgitation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 50:17–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tibayan FA, Rodriguez F, Langer F, Zasio MK, Bailey L, Liang D, Daughters GT, Ingels NB, Miller DC (2005) Annular or subvalvular approach to chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:1266–1275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim K, Kaji S, An Y, Nishino T, Tani T, Kitai T, Furukawa Y (2014) Interpapillary muscle distance independently affects severity of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148:434–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. He S, Fontaine AA, Schwammenthal E, Yoganathan AP, Levine RA (1997) Integrated mechanism for functional mitral regurgitation: leaflet restriction versus coapting force: in vitro studies. Circulation 96:1826–1834

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuwahara E, Otsuji Y, Iguro Y, Ueno T, Zhu F, Mizukami N, Kubota K, Nakashiki K, Yuasa T, Yu B, Uemura T, Takasaki K, Miyata M, Hamasaki S, Kisanuki A, Levine RA, Sakata R, Tei C (2006) Mechanism of recurrent/persistent ischemic/functional mitral regurgitation in the chronic phase after surgical annuloplasty: importance of augmented posterior leaflet tethering. Circulation 114(Suppl):I529–I534

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Magne J, Pibarot P, Dagenais F, Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Sénéchal M (2007) Preoperative posterior leaflet angle accurately predicts outcome after restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation 115:782–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gelsomino S, Lorusso R, Caciolli S, Capecchi I, Rostagno C, Chioccioli M, De Cicco G, Billè G, Stefàno P, Gensini GF (2008) Insights on left ventricular and valvular mechanisms of recurrent ischemic mitral regurgitation after restrictive annuloplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:507–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. De Bonis M, Lapenna E, Verzini A, La Canna G, Grimaldi A, Torracca L, Maisano F, Alfieri O (2008) Recurrence of mitral regurgitation parallels the absence of left ventricular reverse remodeling after mitral repair in advanced dilated cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Surg 85:932–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Komeda M (2017) Quick but effective surgery for functional mitral regurgitation secondary to aortic valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 153:275–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Braun J, Bax JJ, Versteegh MI, Voigt PG, Holman ER, Klautz RJ, Boersma E, Dion RA (2005) Preoperative left ventricular dimensions predict reverse remodeling following restrictive mitral annuloplasty in ischemic mitral regurgitation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27:847–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Calafiore AM, Gallina S, Di Mauro M, Gaeta F, Iacò AL, D’Alessandro S, Mazzei V, Di Giammarco G (2001) Mitral valve procedure in dilated cardiomyopathy: repair or replacement? Ann Thorac Surg 71:1146–1153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chan V, Levac-Martinho O, Sohmer B, Elmistekawy E, Ruel M, Mesana TG (2017) When should the mitral valve be repaired or replaced in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation? Ann Thorac Surg 103:742–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wakasa S, Shingu Y, Ooka T, Katoh H, Tachibana T, Matsui Y (2015) Surgical strategy for ischemic mitral regurgitation adopting subvalvular and ventricular procedures. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 21:370–377

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Masuyama S, Marui A, Shimamoto T, Nonaka M, Tsukiji M, Watanabe N, Ikeda T, Yoshida K, Komeda M (2008) Chordal translocation for ischemic mitral regurgitation may ameliorate tethering of the posterior and anterior mitral leaflets. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:868–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yamaguchi A, Adachi K, Yuri K, Kimura N, Kimura C, Tamura A, Adachi H (2013) Reduction of mitral valve leaflet tethering by procedures targeting the subvalvular apparatus in addition to mitral annuloplasty. Circ J 77:1461–1465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Di Donato M, Castelvecchio S, Brankovic J, Santambrogio C, Montericcio V, Menicanti L (2007) Effectiveness of surgical ventricular restoration in patients with dilated ischemic cardiomyopathy and unrepaired mild mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134:1548–1553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kainuma S, Taniguchi K, Toda K, Funatsu T, Miyagawa S, Kondoh H, Masai T, Otake S, Yoshikawa Y, Nishi H, Sakaguchi T, Ueno T, Kuratani T, Daimon T, Sawa Y (2014) Restrictive mitral annuloplasty with or without surgical ventricular reconstruction in ischaemic cardiomyopathy: impacts on neurohormonal activation, reverse left ventricular remodelling and survival. Eur J Heart Fail 16:189–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mandegar MH, Saidi B, Yousefnia MA, Alaeddini F, Roshanali F (2011) Long-term effect of papillary muscle approximation combined with ventriculoplasty on left ventricle function in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and functional mitral regurgitation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40:756–760

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wakasa S, Kubota S, Shingu Y, Ooka T, Tachibana T, Matsui Y (2014) The extent of papillary muscle approximation affects mortality and durability of mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Cardiothorac Surg. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-9-98

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Jensen H, Jensen MO, Smerup MH, Vind-Kezunovic S, Ringgaard S, Andersen NT, Vestergaard R, Wierup P, Hasenkam JM, Nielsen SL (2009) Impact of papillary muscle relocation as adjunct procedure to mitral ring annuloplasty in functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation 120(Suppl):S92–S98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fukuoka M, Nonaka M, Masuyama S, Shimamoto T, Tambara K, Yoshida H, Ikeda T, Komeda M (2007) Chordal “translocation” for functional mitral regurgitation with severe valve tenting: an effort to preserve left ventricular structure and function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133:1004–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. David TE (2015) Patch augmentation of mitral valve leaflet in ischemic mitral regurgitation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 27:95–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Murashita T, Okada Y, Kanemitsu H, Fukunaga N, Konishi Y, Nakamura K, Koyama T (2014) Midterm outcomes of chordal cutting in combination with downsized ring annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20:1008–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Vassileva CM, McNeely C, Mishkel G, Boley T, Markwell S, Hazelrigg S (2013) Gender differences in long-term survival of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 96:1367–1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Editage (http://www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koji Furukawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Furukawa, K., Yano, M., Nakamura, E. et al. Comparison of mitral competence after mitral repair with papillary muscle approximation versus papillary muscle relocation for functional mitral regurgitation. Heart Vessels 33, 72–79 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-017-1038-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-017-1038-8

Keywords

Navigation