Skip to main content
Log in

Shortwave cloud radiative forcing on major stratus cloud regions in AMIP-type simulations of CMIP3 and CMIP5 models

  • Published:
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cloud and its radiative effects are major sources of uncertainty that lead to simulation discrepancies in climate models. In this study, shortwave cloud radiative forcing (SWCF) over major stratus regions is evaluated for Atmospheric Models Intercomparison Project (AMIP)-type simulations of models involved in the third and fifth phases of the Coupled Models Intercomparison Project (CMIP3 and CMIP5). Over stratus regions, large deviations in both climatological mean and seasonal cycle of SWCF are found among the models. An ambient field sorted by dynamic (vertical motion) and thermodynamic (inversion strength or stability) regimes is constructed and used to measure the response of SWCF to large-scale controls. In marine boundary layer regions, despite both CMIP3 and CMIP5 models being able to capture well the center and range of occurrence frequency for the ambient field, most of the models fail to simulate the dependence of SWCF on boundary layer inversion and the insensitivity of SWCF to vertical motion. For eastern China, there are large differences even in the simulated ambient fields. Moreover, almost no model can reproduce intense SWCF in rising motion and high stability regimes. It is also found that models with a finer grid resolution have no evident superiority than their lower resolution versions. The uncertainties relating to SWCF in state-of-the-art models may limit their performance in IPCC experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachiochi, D. R., and T. N. Krishnamurti, 2000: Enhanced low-level stratus in the FSU coupled ocean-atmosphere model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 3083–3103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bony, S., and J.-L. Dufresne, 2005: Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L20806, doi: 10.1029/2005gl023851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bony, S., J. L. Dufresne, H. Le Treut, J. J. Morcrette, and C. Senior, 2004: On dynamic and thermodynamic components of cloud changes. Climate Dyn., 22, 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, C. S., and Coauthors, 2004: The epic 2001 stratocumulus study. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85, 967–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cess, R. D., and Coauthors, 1990: Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 16601–16615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, W. D., and Coauthors, 2004: Description of the NCAR community atmosphere model (CAM 3.0).

    Google Scholar 

  • Colman, R., 2003: A comparison of climate feedbacks in general circulation models. Climate Dyn., 20, 865–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, L., L. Li, W. Huang, Y. Wang, and B. Wang, 2012: Preliminary evaluation of cloud fraction simulations by GAMIL2 using COSP. Atmos. Oceanic Sci. Lett., 5, 258–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eitzen, Z. A., K.-M. Xu, and T. Wong, 2011: An estimate of low-cloud feedbacks from variations of cloud radiative and physical properties with sea surface temperature on interannual time scales. J. Climate, 24, 1106–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gent, P., S. Yeager, R. Neale, S. Levis, and D. Bailey, 2010: Improvements in a half degree atmosphere/land version of the CCSM. Climate Dyn., 34, 819–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa, H., H. Masunaga, Y. Tsushima, and H. Kanzawa, 2011: Reproducibility by climate models of cloud radiative forcing associated with tropical convection. J. Climate, 25, 1247–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, 2007: Cilmate models and their evaluation. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. S. Solomon, et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 589–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. E., and Coauthors, 2012: Exposing global cloud biases in the community atmosphere model (CAM) using satellite observations and their corresponding instrument simulators. J. Climate, 25, 5190–5207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. A., and D. L. Hartmann, 1993: The seasonal cycle of low stratiform clouds. J. Climate, 6, 1587–1606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., and H. Gu, 2006: Relationship between middle stratiform clouds and large scale circulation over eastern China. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L09706, doi: 10.1029/2005gl025615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., R. Yu, T. Zhou, and B. Wang, 2005: Why is there an early spring cooling shift downstream of the Tibetan Plateau? J. Climate, 18, 4660–4668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., X. Guo, and J. Zhu, 2008: Climatic features of cloud water distribution and cycle over China. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 25(3), 437–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, C. C. W., and J. Quaas, 2012: Evaluation of clouds and precipitation in the ECHAM5 general circulation model using CALIPSO and CloudSat satellite data. J. Climate, 25, 4975–4992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J. R., and S. F. Iacobellis, 2005: North Pacific cloud feedbacks inferred from synoptic-scale dynamic and thermodynamic relationships. J. Climate, 18, 4862–4878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, T. J., 1996: Documentation of the AMIP models on the world wide web. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 1191–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, V., and Coauthors, 2007: The met office Hadley Centre climate modelling capability: The competing requirements for improved resolution, complexity and dealing with uncertainty. Philopphical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 365, 2635–2657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Y., C. N. Long, H. Wang, J. M. Comstock, S. A. McFarlane, and S. Xie, 2012: Evaluation of cloud fraction and its radiative effect simulated by IPCC AR4 global models against ARM surface observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1785–1810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, I., and C. R. Mechoso, 2006: Orographic influences on subtropical stratocumulus. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2585–2601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senior, C. A., and J. F. B. Mitchell, 1993: Carbon dioxide and climate. The impact of cloud parameterization. J. Climate, 6, 393–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shell, K. M., J. T. Kiehl, and C. A. Shields, 2008: Using the radiative kernel technique to calculate climate feedbacks in NCAR’s, community atmospheric model. J. Climate, 21, 2269–2282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. N. B., 1990: A scheme for predicting layer clouds and their water content in a general circulation model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 116, 435–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, G. L., 2005: Cloud feedbacks in the climate system: A critical review. J. Climate, 18, 237–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stowasser, M., and K. Hamilton, 2006: Relationship between shortwave cloud radiative forcing and local meteorological variables compared in observations and several global climate models. J. Climate, 19, 4344–4359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C. P., and V. Ramanathan, 1997: Relationships between large-scale vertical velocity, static stability, and cloud radiative forcing over Northern Hemisphere extratropical Oceans. J. Climate, 10, 2871–2887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D., M. A. Ringer, and C. A. Senior, 2003: Evaluating the cloud response to climate change and current climate variability. Climate Dyn., 20, 705–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R., 2012: Stratocumulus clouds. Mon. Wea. Rev, 140, 2373–2423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R., and C. S. Bretherton, 2006: On the relationship between stratiform low cloud cover and lowertropospheric stability. J. Climate, 19, 6425–6432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T., and Coauthors, 2008: The Beijing climate center atmospheric general circulation model: Description and its performance for the present-day climate. Climate Dyn., 34, 149–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyant, M., and Coauthors, 2006: A comparison of lowlatitude cloud properties and their response to climate change in three AGCMs sorted into regimes using mid-tropospheric vertical velocity. Climate Dyn., 27, 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, R., Y. Yu, and M. Zhang, 2001: Comparing cloud radiative properties between the eastern China and the Indian monsoon region. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 18, 1090–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, R., B. Wang, and T. Zhou, 2004: Climate effects of the deep continental stratus clouds generated by the Tibetan Plateau. J. Climate, 17, 2702–2713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, J., D. L. Hartmann, and R. Wood, 2008: Dynamic effects on the tropical cloud radiative forcing and radiation budget. J. Climate, 21, 2337–2351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue, Q., B. H. Kahn, E. J. Fetzer, and J. O. Teixeira, 2011: Relationship between marine boundary layer clouds and lower tropospheric stability observed by AIRS, CloudSat, and CALIOP. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D18212, doi: 10.1029/2011jd016136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M. H., and Coauthors, 2005: Comparing clouds and their seasonal variations in 10 atmospheric general circulation models with satellite measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 110, D15S02, doi: 10.1029/2004jd005021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., C. S. Bretherton, M. Webb, and P. Siebesma, 2010: CFMIP-GCSS intercomparison of large eddy models and single column models (CGILS). GEWEX News, 20(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuidema, P., and D. L. Hartmann, 1995: Satellite determination of stratus cloud, microphysical properties. J. Climate, 8, 1638–1657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Li  (李 建).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Li, J. Shortwave cloud radiative forcing on major stratus cloud regions in AMIP-type simulations of CMIP3 and CMIP5 models. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 30, 884–907 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-013-2153-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-013-2153-9

Key words

Navigation