Abstract
Traditional portfolio optimization has often been criticized for not taking estimation risk into account. Estimation risk is mainly driven by the parameter uncertainty regarding the expected asset returns rather than their variances and covariances. The global minimum variance portfolio has been advocated by many authors as an appropriate alternative to the tangential portfolio. This is because there are no expectations which have to be estimated and thus the impact of estimation errors can be substantially reduced. However, in many practical situations an investor is not willing to choose the global minimum variance portfolio but he wants to minimize the variance of the portfolio return under specific constraints for the portfolio weights. Such a portfolio is called local minimum variance portfolio. Small-sample hypothesis tests for global and local minimum variance portfolios are derived and the exact distributions of the estimated portfolio weights are calculated in the present work. The first two moments of the estimator for the expected portfolio returns are also provided and the presented instruments are illustrated by an empirical study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Black F, Litterman R (1992) Global portfolio optimization. Financ Anal J 48: 28–4
Britten-Jones M (1999) The sampling error in estimates of mean-variance efficient portfolio weights. J Finance 54: 655–671
Chopra VK, Ziemba WT (1993) The effect of errors in means, variances, and covariances on optimal portfolio choice. J Portfolio Manage 19: 6–11
Eichhorn D, Gupta F, Stubbs E (1998) Using constraints to improve the robustness of asset allocation. J Portfolio Manage 24: 41–48
Frahm G (2007) Testing for the best alternative with an application to performance measurement. Discussion paper, University of Cologne, Department of Economic and Social Statistics, Germany
Frost PA, Savarino JE (1986) An empirical Bayes approach to efficient portfolio selection. J Financ Quant Anal 21: 293–305
Frost PA, Savarino JE (1988) For better performance: constrain portfolio weights. J Portfolio Manage 14: 29–34
Geweke J (1986) Exact inference in the inequality constraint normal linear regression model. J Appl Econom 1: 127–141
Gouriéroux C, Holly A, Monfort A (1982) Likelihood ratio test, Wald test, and Kuhn–Tucker test in linear models with inequality constraints on the regression parameters. Econometrica 50: 63–80
Grauer R, Shen F (2000) Do constraints improve portfolio performance?. J Bank Finance 24: 1253–1274
Green R, Hollifield B (1992) When will mean-variance efficient portfolios be well diversified?. J Finance 47: 1785–1809
Greene WH (2003) Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA
Hayashi F (2000) Econometrics. Princeton University Press, NJ
Herold U, Maurer R (2006) Portfolio choice and estimation risk—a comparison of Bayesian to heuristic approaches. ASTIN Bull 36: 135–160
Jagannathan R, Ma T (2003) Risk reduction in large portfolios: why imposing the wrong constraints helps. J Finance 58: 1651–1683
Jorion P (1986) Bayes–Stein estimation for portfolio analysis. J Financ Quant Anal 21: 279–292
Kalymon BA (1971) Estimation risk in the portfolio selection model. J Financ Quant Anal 6: 559–582
Kan R, Zhou G (2005) Optimal portfolio choice with parameter uncertainty. Washington University, Olin School of Business, USA (preprint)
Kempf A, Memmel C (2002) Schätzrisiken in der Portfoliotheorie, In: Kleeberg JM, Rehkugler H (eds) Handbuch Portfoliomanagement. pp. 893–919, Uhlenbruch
Kempf A, Memmel C (2006) Estimating the global minimum variance portfolio. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 58: 332–348
Klein RW, Bawa VS (1976) The effect of estimation risk on optimal portfolio choice. J Financ Econ 3: 215–231
Ledoit O, Wolf M (2003) Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection. J Empir Finance 10: 603–621
Markowitz HM (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7: 77–91
Merton RC (1980) On estimating the expected return on the market: an exploratory investigation. J Financ Econ 8: 323–361
Michaud RO (1989) The Markowitz optimization enigma: is ‘optimized’ optimal?. Financ Anal J 45: 31–42
Okhrin Y, Schmid W (2006) Distributional properties of portfolio weights. J Econom 134: 235–256
Press SJ (2005) Applied multivariate analysis, 2nd edn. Dover Publications, NY, USA
Rao CR (1965) Linear statistical inference and its applications. John Wiley, London
Scherer B (2004) Resampled efficiency and portfolio choice. Financ Markets Portfolio Manage 18: 382–398
Tobin J (1958) Liquidity preferences as behavior towards risk. Rev Econ Stud 25: 325–333
Wolak FA (1987) An exact test for multiple inequality and equality constraints in the linear regression model. J Am Stat Assoc 399: 782–793
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frahm, G. Linear statistical inference for global and local minimum variance portfolios. Stat Papers 51, 789–812 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-008-0170-z
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-008-0170-z
Keywords
- Estimation risk
- Linear regression theory
- Markowitz portfolio
- Minimum variance portfolio
- Portfolio optimization
- Top down investment