Abstract
In this article, an exact test and a confidence set for the difference of the x-coordinates of the vertices of quadratic regression models is derived. It is assumed that the quadratic coefficients of both parabolae are equal, so the mentioned difference can equally be related to those x-coordinates where the parabolae have definite given gradient. The limits of the confidence set are given by mathematical formulae. They are implemented in Fortran programs that can be downloaded from the web. The confidence set need not be an interval. This is shown by an example based on nitrogen-rate trials in Germany, where the wheat yields are modeled as quadratic functions of the nitrogen input.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachmaier M (2007) A confidence set for that x-coordinate where the quadratic regression model has a given gradient. Stat Pap. doi:10.1007/s00362-007-0104-1, in print; 12 pages
Bachmaier M (2008) Test and confidence set for the difference of the x-coordinates of the vertices of two quadratic regression models under equal quadratic coefficients. The Fortran Program civedi.exe to be downloaded from http://www.tec.wzw.tum.de/pflanztech/englisch/personen/bachmaier/bachmaier.html
Casella G, Berger RL (2002) Statistical inference. Duxbury Press, Belmont
Fieller EC (1954) Some problems in interval estimation. J R Stat Soc Ser B 16: 175–185
Koziol D, Zielinski W (2003) Comparison of confidence intervals for maximum of a quadratic regression function. Listy Biometryczne (Biom Lett) 40: 57–64
Lehmann EL (1986) Testing statistical hypothesis. Wiley, New York
Mittelhammer RC, Judge GG, Miller DJ (2000) Econometric foundations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Weisberg S (2005) Applied linear regression, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bachmaier, M. Test and confidence set for the difference of the x-coordinates of the vertices of two quadratic regression models. Stat Papers 51, 285–296 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-008-0159-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-008-0159-7