Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On a criticism of the profile likelihood function

  • Note
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The profile likelihood function is often criticized for giving strange or unintuitive results. In the cases discussed here these are due to the use of density functions that have singularities. These singularities are naturally inherited by the profile likelihood function. It is therefore apparently important to be reminded that likelihood functions are proportional to probability functions, and so cannot have singularities. When this issue is addressed, then the profile likelihood poses no problems of this sort. This is of particular importance since the profile likelihood is a commonly used method for dealing with separate estimation of parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnard GA (1966) The use of the likelihood function in statistical practice. In: Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, vol 1, pp 27–40

  • Barnard GA, Sprott DA (1983) Likelihood. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL (eds) Encyclopedia of statistical science, vol 4. Wiley, New York, pp 639–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger JO, Liseo B, Wolpert RL (1999) Integrated likelihood methods for eliminating nuisance parameters. Stat Sci 14:1–28

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AWF (1992) Likelihood, expanded edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch JG (1985) Probability and statistical inference. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless JF (2003) Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. Wiley, Toronto

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey JK (1998) Some statistical heresies (with discussion). Statistician 47:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeker WQ, Escobar LA (1998) Statistical methods for reliability data. In: Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, New York

  • Sprott DA (2000) Statistical inference in science. In: Springer series in statistics. Springer, New York

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, A.P. 402, Guanajuato, Gto., 36000, Mexico, Mexico

    José A. Montoya, Eloísa Díaz-Francés & David A. Sprott

Authors
  1. José A. Montoya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eloísa Díaz-Francés
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David A. Sprott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eloísa Díaz-Francés.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montoya, J.A., Díaz-Francés, E. & Sprott, D.A. On a criticism of the profile likelihood function. Stat Papers 50, 195–202 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-007-0056-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-007-0056-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation