Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of different choices of order for autoregressive approximation on the Gaussian likelihood estimates for ARMA models

  • Articles
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates, by means of Monte Carlo simulation, the effects of different choices of order for autoregressive approximation on the fully efficient parameter estimates for autoregressive moving average models. Four order selection criteria, AIC, BIC, HQ and PKK, were compared and different model structures with varying sample sizes were used to contrast the performance of the criteria. Some asymptotic results which provide a useful guide for assessing the performance of these criteria are presented. The results of this comparison show that there are marked differences in the accuracy implied using these alternative criteria in small sample situations and that it is preferable to apply BIC criterion, which leads to greater precision of Gaussian likelihood estimates, in such cases. Implications of the findings of this study for the estimation of time series models are highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr., AC-19, 716–723.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N. (1974). On the calculation of filter coefficients for maximum entropy spectral analysis, Geophysics, 39, 69–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhansali, R. J. (1978). Linear prediction by autoregressive model fitting in the time domain. Ann. Statist., 6, 224–231.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, K. N. (1974). Consistent autoregressive spectral estimates, Ann. Statist., 2, 489–502.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G.E.P, Jenkins, G.M. & G. C. Reinsel(1994). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and control, 3rd ed., Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burg, J. (1967). Maximum entropy spectral analysis, 37th Annual International Meeting, Soc. of Explor. Geophysics, Oklahoma city, Oklahoma.

  • De Gooijer, J. G. Abraham, B., Gould, A & L. Robinson (1985). Methods for determining the order of an autoregressive moving average process: A survey, Int. Statist. Rev., 53, 301–329.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Findley, D. F.(1984). On some ambiguities associated with the fitting of ARMA models to time series, J. Time Ser. Anal., 5, 213–225.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, B.(1982). Lattice methods for spectral estimation, Proc. IEEE, 70, 990–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W. A. (1996). Introduction to statistical time series (2nd ed.), Wiley & sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, E. J. & M. Deistler (1988). The statistical theory of linear systems, Wiley & sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, E. J. & L. Kavalieris (1986). Regression, Autoregression models, J. Time Ser. Anal., 7, 27–49.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, E. J., McDougall, A.M. & D. S. Poskitt (1989). Recursive estimation for autoregressions, J. R. Statist. Soc., B51, 217–233.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, E. J. & B. G. Quinn (1979). The determination of the order of an autoregression, J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B, 40, 190–195.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, E. J. & J. Rissanen (1982). Recursive estimation of mixed autoregressive moving average order, Biometrika, 69, 81–94.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, R (1978). Asymptotic properties of time domain Gaussian estimators, Adv. Appl. Prob., 10, 339–359.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. & G. C. Reinsel (1985). Prediction of multivariate time series by autoregressive model fitting, J. Multiv. Anal., 16, 393–411.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lütkepohl, H. (1985). Comparison of criteria for estimating the order of a vector autoregressive processes, J. Time Ser. Anal., 6, 35–52.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Marple, L. (1980). A new autoregressive spectrum analysis algorithm, IEEE Trans. Acoust speech signal process, 28, 4, 441–454.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Parzen, E. (1969). Multiple time series modeling, In P. R. Krishnaiah (ed.), Multivariate analysis II, 389–409, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poskitt, D. S. & M. O. Salau (1995). On the relationship between generalized least squares and Gaussian estimation of vector ARMA models, J. Time Ser. Anal., 16, 6, 617–645.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pötscher, B. M. & S. Srinivasan (1994). A comparison of order estimation procedures for ARMA models, Statistica Sinica, 4, 29–50.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pukkila, T., Koreisha, S. & A. Kallinen (1990). The identification of ARMA models, Biometrika, 77, 537–548

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rissanen, J. (1978). Modelling by shortest data description, Automatica, 14, 465–471.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Salau, M. O. (1995). On the numerical implementation of the generalised least squares procedure for ARMA estimation, Comm. Statist: Simul. Comput., 24, 1, 111–130.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model, Ann. Statist., 461–464.

  • Shibata, R (1981). An optimal autoregressive spectral estimate. Ann. Statist., 9, 300–306.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tjostheim, D. & J. Paulsen (1983). Bias of some commonly-used time series estimates, Biometrika, 70, 2, 389–399.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tunnicliffe-Wilson, G. (1969). Factorization of the covariance generating functions of a pure moving-average process, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 6, 1–7.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tunicliffe-Wilson, G (1979). Some efficient computational procedures for high order ARMA models, J. Statist. Comp. Simul., 8, 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salau, M.O. The effects of different choices of order for autoregressive approximation on the Gaussian likelihood estimates for ARMA models. Statistical Papers 44, 89–105 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-002-0135-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-002-0135-6

Keywords

Navigation