Skip to main content
Log in

The construction of data to reflect the research objective, and how randomisation tests make such data usable

  • Article
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When comparing the central values of two independent groups, should a t-test be performed, or should the observations be transformed into their ranks and a Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test performed? This paper argues that neither should automatically be chosen. Instead, provided that software for conducting randomisation tests is available, the chief concern should be with obtaining data values that are a good reflection of scientific reality and appropriate to the objective of the research; if necessary, the data values should be transformed so that this is so. The subsequent use of a randomisation (permutation) test will mean that failure of the transformed data values to satisfy assumptions such as normality and equality of variances will not be of concern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abt, K. (1996). How statistics can ’lie’. European Journal of Anesthesiology, 13, 427–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield, C. (1995). Problem Solving. A Statistician’s Guide. 2nd Edition. Chapman and Hall, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gøtzsche, P.C. (1996). Blinding during data analysis and writing of manuscripts. Controlled Clinical Trials, 17, 285–293 (including comments by G.L. Knatterud and S.J. Pocock).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D., Pattison, P. and Robins, G. (1997). Evidence, inference, and the ’rejection’ of the significance test. Australian Journal of Psychology, 49, 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.J. (1994). ANOVA: An Analysis of Variance Primer. Peacock, Itasca, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, C. (1988). Exploring Data. An Introduction to Data Analysis for Social Scientists. Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, W.L. and Johnson, W.D. (1997). A SASR macro for the multivariate extension of the Kruskal-Wallis test including multiple comparisons: Randomization and x2 criteria. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 22, 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, C. and Patel, N. (1995). StatXact 3 for Windows. Cytel Software Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, P.W. (1986). Non-metric statistical analyses: Some metric alternatives. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 13, 377–387.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, P.W. and Berry, K.J. (1983). Asymptotic clarifications, generalizations, and concerns regarding an extended class of matched pairs tests based on powers of ranks. Psychometrika, 48, 483–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Routledge, R.D. (1997). P-values from permutation and F-tests. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 24, 379–386.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Slauson, W.L., Cade, B.S. and Richards, J.D. (1999). User Manual for BLOSSOM Statistical Software. Midcontinent Ecological Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful advice from two referees.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hutchinson, T.P., Cairns, D. & Chekaluk, E. The construction of data to reflect the research objective, and how randomisation tests make such data usable. Statistical Papers 43, 349–359 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-002-0109-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-002-0109-8

Keywords

Navigation