Skip to main content
Log in

Improved estimators for the selected location parameters

  • Note
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let πi, i = 1, 2, ..., k be k independent exponential populations with different unknown location parameters θi, i = 1, 2, ..., k and common known scale parameter σ. Let Y idenote the smallest observation based on a random sample of size n from the i-th population. Suppose a subset of the given k populations is selected using the subset selection procedure according to which the population πi, is selected iff Y iY (1) - d, where Y (1) is the largest of the Y i’s and d is some suitable constant. The estimation of the location parameters associated with the selected populations is considered for the squared error loss. It is observed that the natural estimator dominates the unbiased estimator. It is also shown that the natural estimator itself is inadmissible and a class of improved estimators that dominate the natural estimator is obtained. The improved estimators are consistent and their risks are shown to be O(kn -2). As a special case, we obtain the corresponding results for the estimation of θ(1), the parameter associated with Y (1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cohen, A. and Sackrowitz, H. (1989): Two stage conditionally unbiased estimators of the selected mean. Statist. Probab. Lett, 8, 273–278.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, J.V. and Fareed, T.P.M. (1995): A note on conditionally unbiased estimation after selection. Statist. & Probab. Lett., 22, 17–23.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fareed, T.P.M. (1995): Two stage conditionally unbiased estimation following selection. J. Ind. Statist. Assoc., 33, 123–135.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S.S. (1965): On some multiple decision (Selection and Ranking) rules. Technometrics, 7, 225–245.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S.S. and Panchapakesan, S (1979): Multiple Decision Procedures: Theory and Methodology of Selecting and Ranking Populations. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jeyarathnam, S. and Panchapakesan, S. (1984): An estimation problem relating to subset selection for normal populations. In: T.J Santner and A.C. Tamhane eds., Design of Experiments: Ranking and Selection. Marcel Decker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeyarathnam, S. and Panchapakesan, S. (1986): Estimation after subset selection from exponential populations. Coram. Statist. Theory Methods, 15, 3459–3473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, H.E. (1988): The UV method of estimation. Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics IV, 1 (eds. S.S. Gupta and J.O. Berger), Springer, New York, 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, R. (1992): On estimating the mean of the selected uniform population. Comm. Statist. — Theory Methods, 21, 2707–2719.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vellaisamy, P. (1996): A note on the estimation of selected scale parameters. J. Statist. Plann. Inference, 55, 39–46.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vellaisamy, P. and Sharma, D. (1990): On estimation after subset selection from exponential populations. Sankhya, Ser. B, 52, 305–318.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yatracos, Y.G. (1992): On prediction and mean squared error. Canad. J. Statist., 20, 187–200.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vellaisamy, P., Punnen, A.P. Improved estimators for the selected location parameters. Statistical Papers 43, 291–299 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-002-0102-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-002-0102-2

Key words and Phrases

AMS 1991 Subject Classifications

Navigation