Skip to main content
Log in

Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy

  • Invited Review
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is generally considered a safe technique offering the highest stone-free rates after the first treatment as compared to the other minimal invasive lithotripsy techniques. Still, serious complications although rare should be expected following this percutaneous procedure. In this work, the most common and important complications associated with PCNL are being reviewed focusing on the perioperative risk factors, current management, and preventing measures that need to be taken to reduce their incidence. In addition, complication reporting is being criticized given the absence of a universal consensus on PCNL complications description. Complications such as perioperative bleeding, urine leak from nephrocutaneous fistula, pelvicalyceal system injury, and pain are individually graded as complications by various authors and are responsible for a significant variation in the reported overall PCNL complication rate, rendering comparison of morbidity between studies almost impossible. Due to the latter, a universally accepted grading system specialized for the assessment of PCNL-related complications and standardized for each variation of PCNL technique is deemed necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rupel E, Brown R (1941) Nephroscopy with removal of stone following nephrostomy for obstructive calculous anuria. J Urol 46:177–182

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goodwin WE, Casey WC, Woolf W (1955) Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis. J Am Med Assoc 157:891–894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wickham JE, Kellett MJ (1981) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Br J Urol 53:297–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A et al (2014) European Association of Urology Guidlines on Urolithiasis. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/22%20Urolithiasis_LR.pdf

  5. Wiesenthal JD, Ghiculete D, Honey RJD’A, Pace KT (2011) A comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy equivalent? J Endourol 25(3):481–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M et al (2011) The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. CROES PCNL Study Group. J Endourol 25(1):11–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51:899–906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shin TS, Cho HJ, Hong SH et al (2011) Complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy classified by the modified Clavien grading system: a single center’s experience over 16 years. Korean J Urol 52(11):769–775

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K et al (2008) Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53:184–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Falahatkar S, Khosropanah I, Roshan ZA et al (2009) Decreasing the complications of PCNL with alternative techniques including complete supine PCNL and subcostal approach. Pak J Med Sci 25(3):353–358

    Google Scholar 

  11. Seitz C, Desai M, Häcker A et al (2012) Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol 61(1):146–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee WJ, Smith AS, Cubelli V et al (1987) Complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Am J Roentgenol 148(1):177–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Osman M, Wendt-Nordahl G, Heger K et al (2005) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography-guided renal access: experience from over 300 cases. BJU Int 96(6):875–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Andonian S, Scoffone CM, Louie MK et al (2013) Does imaging modality used for percutaneous renal access make a difference? A matched case analysis. J Endourol 27(1):24–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee JK, Kim BS, Park YK (2013) Predictive factors for bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Korean J Urol 54(7):448–453

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Richstone L, Reggio E, Ost MC et al (2008) First prize (tie): hemorrhage following percutaneous renal surgery: characterization of angiographic findings. J Endourol 22(6):1129–1135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Keoghane SR, Cetti RJ, Rogers AE, Walmsley BH (2013) Blood transfusion, embolisation and nephrectomy after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). BJU Int 111(4):628–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jinga V, Dorobat B, Youssef S et al (2013) Transarterial embolization of renal vascular lesions after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Chirurgia (Bucur) 108(4):521–529

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Semins MJ, Bartik L, Chew BH et al (2011) Multicenter analysis of postoperative CT findings after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: defining complication rates. Urology 78(2):291–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rastinehad AR, Andonian S, Smith AD, Siegel DN (2009) Management of hemorrhagic complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 23:1763–1767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Charton M, Vallancien G, Veillon B, Brisset JM (1986) Urinary tract infection in percutaneous surgery for renal calculi. J Urol 135(1):15–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Doğan HS, Sahin A, Cetinkaya Y et al (2002) Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study in 81 patients. J Endourol 16(9):649–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kreydin EI, Eisner BH (2013) Risk factors for sepsis after percutaneous renal stone surgery. Nat Rev Urol 10(10):598–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tuzel E, Aktepe OC, Akdogan B (2013) Prospective comparative study of two protocols of antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 27(2):172–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mariappan P, Smith G, Moussa SA, Tolley DA (2006) One week of ciprofloxacin before percutaneous nephrolithotomy significantly reduces upper tract infection and urosepsis: a prospective controlled study. BJU Int 98(5):1075–1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang MG, Zheng ZD, Xu ZQ et al (2013) Prophylactic antibiotic use in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 51(10):922–927

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Munver R, Delvecchio FC, Newman GE, Preminger GM (2001) Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 166:1242–1246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lojanapiwat B, Prasopsuk S (2006) Upper-pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches. J Endourol 20(7):491–494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dirim A, Turunc T, Kuzgunbay B et al (2001) Which factors may effect urinary leakage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy? World J Urol 29(6):761–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liatsikos EN, Kapoor R, Lee B et al (2005) “Angular percutaneous renal access”. Multiple tracts through a single incision for staghorn calculous treatment in a single session. Eur Urol 48(5):832–837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mousavi-Bahar SH, Mehrabi S, Moslemi MK (2011) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications in 671 consecutive patients: a single-center experience. Urol J 8(4):271–276

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. El-Nahas AR, Shokeir AA, El-Assmy AM et al (2006) Colonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: study of risk factors. Urology 67(5):937–941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kachrilas S, Papatsoris A, Bach C et al (2012) Colon perforation during percutaneous renal surgery: a 10-year experience in a single endourology centre. Urol Res 40(3):263–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. El-Nahas AR, Mansour AM, Ellaithy R, Abol-Enein H (2008) Case report: conservative treatment of liver injury during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 22(8):1649–1652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Carey RI, Siddiq FM, Guerra J, Bird VG (2006) Conservative management of a splenic injury related to percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. JSLS 10(4):504–506

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shah HN, Hegde SS, Mahajan AP et al (2007) Splenic injury: rare complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: report of two cases with review of literature. J Endourol 21:919–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nasseh H, Pourreza F, Saberi A et al (2013) Focal neuropathies following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)—preliminary study. Ger Med Sci 11:Doc07

  38. Basiri A, Soltani MH, Kamranmanesh M et al (2013) Neurologic complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Korean J Urol 54(3):172–176

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Garofalo M, Pultrone CV, Schiavina R et al (2013) Tubeless procedure reduces hospitalization and pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: results of a multivariable analysis. Urolithiasis 41(4):347–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang J, Zhao C, Zhang C et al (2012) Tubeless vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. BJU Int 109(6):918–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhong Q, Zheng C, Mo J et al (2013) Total tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. J Endourol 27(4):420–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Unsal A, Resorlu B, Atmaca AF et al (2012) Prediction of morbidity and mortality after percutaneous nephrolithotomy by using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Urology. 79(1):55–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wu P, Wang L, Wang K (2011) Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 43(1):67–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. El-Nahas AR, Shokeir AA, El-Assmy AM et al (2007) Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy extensive hemorrhage: a study of risk factors. J Urol 177(2):576–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Amer T, Ahmed K, Bultitude M et al (2012) Standard versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. Urol Int 88(4):373–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Guven S, Frattini A, Onal B et al (2013) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children in different age groups: data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. BJU Int 111(1):148–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zeng G, Zhao Z, Wan S et al (2013) Comparison of children versus adults undergoing mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: large-scale analysis of a single institution. PLoS One 8(6):e66850

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Okeke Z, Smith AD, Labate G et al (2012) Prospective comparison of outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients versus younger patients. J Endourol 26(8):996–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kamphuis GM, Baard J, Westendarp M, de la Rosette JJ (2014) Lessons learned from the CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. World J Urol (Epub ahead of print)

  50. Fuller A, Razvi H, Denstedt JD et al (2014) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: outcomes in the morbidly obese patient—a case control analysis. Can Urol Assoc J 8(5–6):E393–E397

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Akman T, Binbay M, Erbin A et al (2012) The impact of metabolic syndrome on long-term outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). BJU Int 110(11 Pt C):E1079–E1083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Schilling D, Gakis G, Walcher U et al (2011) The learning curve in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: a 1-year retrospective evaluation of a novice and an expert. World J Urol 29(6):749–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tanriverdi O, Boylu U, Kendirci M et al (2007) The learning curve in the training of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 52:206–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ziaee SA, Sichani MM, Kashi AH, Samzadeh M (2010) Evaluation of the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol J 7:226–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang Y, Jiang F, Wang Y et al (2012) Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy septic shock and severe hemorrhage: a study of risk factors. Urol Int 88(3):307–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evangelos Liatsikos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kyriazis, I., Panagopoulos, V., Kallidonis, P. et al. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 33, 1069–1077 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1400-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1400-8

Keywords

Navigation