Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Staging of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: can computerized tomography help us to decide on local treatment?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the power of multi-detector row computerized tomography (MDCT) in daily routine as a basic staging procedure for the decision on local treatment of patients with bladder cancer.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analysed 276 patients who had undergone radical cystectomy between 2004 and 2008 and correlated the MDCT findings with pathological findings, number of removed lymph nodes and type of urinary diversion.

Results

Accuracy of MDCT in predicting pathological tumour stage was 49% (kappa coefficient, 0.23; P < 0.001). Overstaging occurred in 23.4%, and understaging occurred in 24.7%. Accuracy in predicting lymph node metastases was 54% (kappa coefficient, 0.04; P = 0.297). Overstaging and understaging occurred in 8.3 and 29.4%, respectively. Significantly more ileal conduits were performed in patients with high postoperative pathological tumour stages (P = 0.04) and positive lymph nodes (P = 0.013). In contrast, there was no correlation between preoperative CT tumour/nodal stage and the number of removed lymph nodes (P = 0.44 and P = 0.732, respectively), and between preoperative tumour stage and type of urinary diversion (P = 0.126).

Conclusions

MDCT as a preoperative staging procedure has a low accuracy in predicting the correct tumour and nodal stage, and therefore, it has little impact on decision-making for local treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer during radical cystectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E et al (2005) ) Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 55:10–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stenzl A, Cowan NC, De Santis M et al (2011) Treatment of muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: update of the EAU guidelines. Eur Urol 59:1009–1018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Abol-Enein H, Tilki D, Mosbah A et al (2011) Does the extent of lymphadenectomy in radical cystectomy for bladder cancer influence disease-free survival? A prospective single-center study. Eur Urol

  4. Karl A, Carroll PR, Gschwend JE et al (2009) The impact of lymphadenectomy and lymph node metastasis on the outcomes of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Eur Urol 55:826–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herr HW, Donat SM (2001) Outcome of patients with grossly node positive bladder cancer after pelvic lymph node dissection and radical cystectomy. J Urol 165:62–64; discussion 64

    Google Scholar 

  6. Katkoori D, Manoharan M, Araki M, Soloway MS (2010) Role of patient-physician dialogue in selecting the type of urinary diversion. Urol Int 84:40–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho KS, Seo JW, Park SJ et al (2009) The risk factor for urethral recurrence after radical cystectomy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Urol Int 82:306–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuczyk M, Turkeri L, Hammerer P, Ravery V (2003) Is there a role for bladder preserving strategies in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer? Eur Urol 44:57–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sabaa MA, El-Gamal OM, Abo-Elenen M, Khanam A (2010) Combined modality treatment with bladder preservation for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 28:14–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang J, Gerst S, Lefkowitz RA, Bach A (2007) Imaging of bladder cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 45:183–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Caterino M, Giunta S, Finocchi V et al (2001) Primary cancer of the urinary bladder: CT evaluation of the T parameter with different techniques. Abdom Imaging 26:433–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ficarra V, Dalpiaz O, Alrabi N, Novara G, Galfano A, Artibani W (2005) Correlation between clinical and pathological staging in a series of radical cystectomies for bladder carcinoma. BJU Int 95:786–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paik ML, Scolieri MJ, Brown SL, Spirnak JP, Resnick MI (2000) Limitations of computerized tomography in staging invasive bladder cancer before radical cystectomy. J Urol 163:1693–1696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. MacVicar AD (2000) Bladder cancer staging. BJU Int 86 Suppl 1:111–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baltaci S, Resorlu B, Yagci C, Turkolmez K, Gogus C, Beduk Y (2008) Computerized tomography for detecting perivesical infiltration and lymph node metastasis in invasive bladder carcinoma. Urol Int 81:399–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Altman D, Douglas G (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London, p 404

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim JK, Park SY, Ahn HJ, Kim CS, Cho KS (2004) Bladder cancer: analysis of multi-detector row helical CT enhancement pattern and accuracy in tumor detection and perivesical staging. Radiology 231:725–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fleischmann A, Thalmann GN, Markwalder R, Studer UE (2005) Extracapsular extension of pelvic lymph node metastases from urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is an independent prognostic factor. J Clin Oncol 23:2358–2365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Herr HW (1996) Routine CT scan in cystectomy patients: does it change management? Urology 47:324–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Powles T, Murray I, Brock C, Oliver T, Avril N (2007) Molecular positron emission tomography and PET/CT imaging in urological malignancies. Eur Urol 51:1511–1520; discussion 1520–1521

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sherif A, Garske U, de la Torre M, Thorn M (2006) Hybrid SPECT-CT: an additional technique for sentinel node detection of patients with invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 50:83–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Tritschler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tritschler, S., Mosler, C., Straub, J. et al. Staging of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: can computerized tomography help us to decide on local treatment?. World J Urol 30, 827–831 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0817-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0817-6

Keywords

Navigation