Skip to main content
Log in

Differentiating the acute phase of gout from the intercritical phase with ultrasound and quantitative shear wave elastography

  • Musculoskeletal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the value of ultrasound (US) in differentiating the acute phase of gout from the intercritical phase, particularly using shear wave elastography (SWE).

Methods

57 gout patients were prospectively enrolled and divided into acute phase and intercritical phase groups. The patients underwent US and SWE examinations for the first metatarsophalangeal joints with the same protocol. Maximum synovial thickness was measured. US features were reviewed by two radiologists independently. The maximum (Emax) and mean (Emean) elastic moduli of synovium were calculated. Diagnostic performances of US, SWE and combined US and SWE were evaluated.

Results

US findings demonstrated that the colour Doppler flow signal grade in the acute phase was higher than that in the intercritical phase (p = 0.001), whereas no differences were found for B-mode US features between the two groups (all p > 0.05). For SWE, Emax and Emean were significantly higher in the intercritical phase than in the acute phase (both p < 0.001). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) were 0.494–0.553 for B-mode US, 0.735 for colour Doppler US (CDUS), 0.887 for Emax and 0.882 for Emean. The combination of CDUS and SWE increased the AUROC, sensitivity and accuracy significantly in comparison with CDUS alone (all p < 0.001). However, the combined set did not show stronger diagnostic performance in comparison with SWE alone.

Conclusion

SWE increases the diagnostic performance in differentiating the acute phase of gout from the intercritical phase in comparison with conventional US.

Key Points

• Colour Doppler flow signal grade is higher in acute phase of gout than in intercritical phase.

• SWE demonstrates that synovium stiffness is higher in intercritical phase of gout than in acute phase.

• SWE increases diagnostic performance in differentiating acute phase of gout from intercritical phase in comparison with conventional US.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACR:

American College of Rheumatology

AUROC:

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

CDUS:

Colour Doppler ultrasound

DCS:

Double-contour sign

EULAR:

European League Against Rheumatism

MSU:

Monosodium urate

MTPJ:

Metatarsophalangeal joint

NPV:

Negative predictive value

PPV:

Positive predictive value

SWE:

Shear wave elastrography

US:

Ultrasound

References

  1. Khanna D, Khanna PP, Fitzgerald JD et al (2012) 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 2: therapy and antiinflammatory prophylaxis of acute gouty arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 64:1447–1461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK (2011) Prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2008. Arthritis Rheum 63:3136–3141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bardin T, Richette P (2014) Definition of hyperuricemia and gouty conditions. Curr Opin Rheumatol 26:186–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Neogi T (2011) Gout. N Engl J Med 364:443–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hainer BL, Matheson E, Wilkes RT (2014) Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of gout. Am Fam Physician 90:831–836

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wallace SL, Robinson H, Masi AT, Decker JL, McCarty DJ, Yü TF (1977) Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout. Arthritis Rheum 20:895–900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Loeb JN (1972) The influence of temperature on the solubility of monosodium urate. Arthritis Rheum 15:189–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Neogi T, Jansen TL, Dalbeth N et al (2015) 2015 Gout Classification Criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 67:2557–2568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li DD, Xu HX, Guo LH et al (2016) Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol 26:3290–3300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Park SY, Choi JS, Han BK, Ko EY, Ko ES (2017) Shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions: factors associated with false negative and false positive results. Eur Radiol 27:3788–3798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosskopf AB, Ehrmann C, Buck FM, Gerber C, Flück M, Pfirrmann CW (2016) Quantitative shear-wave US elastography of the supraspinatus muscle: reliability of the method and relation to tendon integrity and muscle quality. Radiology 278:465–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tang Y, Yan F, Yang Y et al (2017) Value of shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of gouty and non-gouty arthritis. Ultrasound Med Biol 43:884–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Slane LC, Martin J, DeWall R, Thelen D, Lee K (2017) Quantitative ultrasound mapping of regional variations in shear wave speeds of the aging Achilles tendon. Eur Radiol 27:474–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pass B, Jafari M, Rowbotham E, Hensor EM, Gupta H, Robinson P (2017) Do quantitative and qualitative shear wave elastography have a role in evaluating musculoskeletal soft tissue masses? Eur Radiol 27:723–731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Doherty M (2009) New insights into the epidemiology of gout. Rheumatology 48:ii2–ii8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Martinoli C (2010) Musculoskeletal ultrasound: technical guidelines. Insights Imaging 1:99–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gutierrez M, Schmidt WA, Thiele RG et al (2015) International Consensus for ultrasound lesions in gout: results of Delphi process and web-reliability exercise. Rheumatology (Oxford) 54:1797–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Naredo E, Collado P, Cruz A et al (2007) Longitudinal power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammatory activity in early rheumatoid arthritis: predictive value in disease activity and radiologic progression. Arthritis Rheum 57:116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Elsaman AM, Muhammad EM, Pessler F (2016) Sonographic findings in gouty arthritis: diagnostic value and association with disease duration. Ultrasound Med Biol 42:1330–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martinon F, Pétrilli V, Mayor A, Tardivel A, Tschopp J (2006) Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature 440:237–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Walther M, Harms H, Krenn V, Radke S, Faehndrich TP, Gohlke F (2001) Correlation of power Doppler sonography with vascularity of the synovial tissue of the knee joint in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 44:331–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fodor D, Nestorova R, Vlad V, Micu M (2014) The place of musculoskeletal ultrasonography in gout diagnosis. Med Ultrason 16:336–344

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schlesinger N, Thiele RG (2010) The pathogenesis of bone erosions in gouty arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 69:1907–1912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chhana A, Dalbeth N (2015) The gouty tophus: a review. Curr Rheumatol Rep 17:19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Jacobsen S, Klarlund M, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M (2003) Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48:955–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu CH, Chen WS, Wang TG (2016) Elasticity of the coracohumeral ligament in patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Radiology 278:458–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sconfienza LM, Silvestri E, Orlandi D et al (2013) Real-time sonoelastography of the plantar fascia: comparison between patients with plantar fasciitis and healthy control subjects. Radiology 267:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study has received funding by the Shanghai Hospital Development Center (Grant 16CR3061B), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grants 14441900900 and 16411971100) and the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant 81725008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Le-Hang Guo or Hui-Xiong Xu.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Hui-Xiong Xu.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional review board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• prospective

• diagnostic study

• performed at one institution

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Guo, LH., Li, XL. et al. Differentiating the acute phase of gout from the intercritical phase with ultrasound and quantitative shear wave elastography. Eur Radiol 28, 5316–5327 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5529-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5529-5

Keywords

Navigation