Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regional impairment of 18F-FDG uptake in the cervical spinal cord in patients with monosegmental chronic cervical myelopathy

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this preliminary report was to assess glucose metabolism in the cervical spine of patients with chronic compressive myelopathy by using FDG PET.

Methods

Ten patients with monosegmental chronic degenerative stenosis and local cord compression of the upper/middle cervical spine with signs of myelopathy on MRI and 10 control patients without known cervical abnormalities were investigated by FDG PET. Maximum standardised uptake values (SUVmax) were measured at all levels of the cervical spine (C1–C7).

Results

While the controls showed the typical pattern of homogeneous linear FDG uptake along the entire cervical cord, the patients with chronic compressive myelopathy had a normal glucose utilisation only above the level of stenosis and a significant decrease in FDG uptake below their individual level of cord compression. This may be caused by atrophy of anterior grey horn cells and the loss of glucose-consuming neurons below the level of cord compression.

Conclusion

FDG PET of the spine of patients with chronic compressive myelopathy may be helpful to determine the stage and severity of cervical myelopathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boakye M, Patil CG, Santarelli J et al (2008) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: complications and outcomes after spinal fusion. Neurosurgery 62:455–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alafifi T, Kern R, Fehlings M (2007) Clinical and MRI predictors of outcome after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neuroimaging 17:315–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kato Y, Kataoka H, Ichihara K et al (2008) Biomechanical study of cervical flexion myelopathy using a three-dimensional finite element method. J Neurosurg Spine 8:436–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ito T, Oyanagi K, Takahashi H et al (1996) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinicopathologic study on the progression pattern and thin myelinated fibers of the lesions of seven patients examined during complete autopsy. Spine 21:827–833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilbert JW, Wheeler GR, Spitalieri JR et al (2008) Prognosis in spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 8:498–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mastronardi L, Elsawaf A, Roperto R et al (2007) Prognostic relevance of the postoperative evolution of intramedullary spinal cord changes in signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging after anterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 7:615–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fernández de Rota JJ, Meschian S, Fernández de Rota A et al (2007) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy due to chronic compression: the role of signal intensity changes in magnetic resonance images. J Neurosurg Spine 6:17–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Suri A, Chabbra RP, Mehta VS et al (2003) Effect of intramedullary signal changes on the surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 3:33–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Uchida K, Nakajima H, Yayama T et al (2009) High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and 18FDG-PET findings of the cervical spinal cord before and after decompressive surgery in patients with compressive myelopathy. Spine 34:1185–1191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Uchida K, Kobayashi S, Yayama T et al (2004) Metabolic neuroimaging of the cervical spinal cord in patients with compressive myelopathy: a high-resolution positron emission tomography study. J Neurosurg Spine 1:72–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baba H, Uchida K, Sadato N et al (1999) Potential usefulness of 18F-2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in cervical compressive myelopathy. Spine 24:1449–1454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamoto Y, Sadato N, Yonekura Y et al (1998) Visualization of the cervical spinal cord with FDG and high-resolution PET. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:487–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (1976) Criteria on the evaluation of treatment of cervical myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop 49:addenda no. 5

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen NC, Sayed MM, Taalab K et al (2008) Spinal cord metastases from lung cancer: detection with F-18 FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 33:356–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Francken AB, Hong AM, Fulham MJ et al (2005) Detection of unsuspected spinal cord compression in melanoma patients by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:197–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Metser U, Lerman H, Blank A et al (2004) Malignant involvement of the spine: assessment by 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 45:279–284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Komori T, Delbeke D (2001) Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and intramedullary spinal cord metastases from lung cancer: detection with FDG positron emission tomography. Clin Nucl Med 26:905–907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Poggi MM, Patronas N, Buttman JA et al (2001) Intramedullary spinal cord metastasis from renal cell carcinoma: detection by positron emission tomography. Clin Nucl Med 26:837–839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilmshurst JM, Barrington SF, Pritchard D et al (2000) Positron emission tomography in imaging spinal cord tumors. J Child Neurol 15:465–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Meltzer CC, Townsend DW, Kottapally S et al (1998) FDG imaging of spinal cord primitive neuroectodermal tumor. J Nucl Med 39:1207–1209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Di Chiro G, Oldfield E, Bairamian D et al (1983) Metabolic imaging of the brain stem and spinal cord: studies with positron emission tomography using 18F-2-deoxyglucose in normal and pathological cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 7:937–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gemmel F, Dumarey N, Palestro CJ (2006) Radionuclide imaging of spinal infections. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:1226–1237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Popovich T, Carpenter JS, Rai AT et al (2006) Spinal cord compression by tophaceous gout with fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomographic/MR fusion imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:1201–1203

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ota K, Tsunemi T, Saito K et al (2009) (18)F-FDG PET successfully detects spinal cord sarcoidosis. J Neurol 256:1943–1946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dubey N, Miletich RS, Wasay M et al (2002) Role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis. J Neurol Sci 205:77–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Uchida K, Nakajima H, Takamura T et al (2009) Neurological improvement associated with resolution of irradiation-induced myelopathy: serial magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography findings. J Neuroimaging 19:274–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chamroonrat W, Posteraro A, El-Haddad G et al (2005) Radiation myelopathy visualized as increased FDG uptake on positron emission tomography. Clin Nucl Med 30:560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Esik O, Emri M, Szakáll S Jr et al (2004) PET identifies transitional metabolic change in the spinal cord following a subthreshold dose of irradiation. Pathol Oncol Res 10:42–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Esik O, Csere T, Stefanits K et al (2003) Increased metabolic activity in the spinal cord of patients with long-standing Lhermitte’s sign. Strahlenther Onkol 179:690–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nakamoto Y, Tatsumi M, Hammoud D et al (2005) Normal FDG distribution patterns in the head and neck: PET/CT evaluation. Radiology 234:879–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany

    Frank Willi Floeth, Jörg Herdmann & Hans-Jakob Steiger

  2. Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

    Gabriele Stoffels & Karl-Josef Langen

  3. Central Institute of Applied Mathematics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

    Paul Jansen & Wolfgang Meyer

  4. Department of Spine and Pain, St. Vinzenz Hospital, Schloßstrasse 85, 40477, Düsseldorf, Germany

    Frank Willi Floeth & Jörg Herdmann

  5. Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4 (Brain Imaging Physics), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany

    Karl-Josef Langen

Authors
  1. Frank Willi Floeth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gabriele Stoffels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jörg Herdmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul Jansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wolfgang Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hans-Jakob Steiger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Karl-Josef Langen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl-Josef Langen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Floeth, F.W., Stoffels, G., Herdmann, J. et al. Regional impairment of 18F-FDG uptake in the cervical spinal cord in patients with monosegmental chronic cervical myelopathy. Eur Radiol 20, 2925–2932 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1877-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1877-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation