Skip to main content
Log in

Behaviour and characteristics of mating polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Beaufort Sea, Canada

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamic sea ice habitat of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) influences their mating behaviour because it makes the distribution of mates unpredictable. Pronounced sexual dimorphism of polar bears likely results from a polygynous mating system, where intrasexual competition between males influences reproductive access to females. We examine aspects of the mating behaviour of polar bears in the Beaufort Sea, Canada, from 1970 to 2014 based on 135 breeding pairs observed from March through May. Mean age of paired females and paired males was 9.7 and 11.5 years, respectively. Paired males were older (by 2.2 years) and had significantly higher mass (71 kg) than unpaired males suggesting a polygynous mating system in which larger, dominant, and potentially experienced males monopolise access to females. Our binomial logistic regression suggested age was the most important factor in predicting pairing in males, which can be explained by the correlation between age and body size. Paired females had significantly higher labial development than lone females, suggesting that labial swelling is heightened during mating. Taken together, these observed characteristics suggest a polygynous mating system in polar bears, providing further insight into potential mating system variation across their range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amstrup SC, Durner GM, Stirling I, Lunn NN, Messier F (2000) Movements and distribution of polar bears in the Beaufort Sea. Can J Zool 78:948–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson SN, Ramsay MA (1995) The effects of prolonged fasting of the body-composition and reproductive success of female polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Funct Ecol 9:559–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood TC, Marcot BG, Douglas DC, Amstrup SC, Rode KD, Durner GM, Bromaghin JF (2016) Forecasting the relative influence of environmental and anthropogenic stressors on polar bears. Ecosphere 7:e01370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bissonnette A, Bischofberger N, van Schaik CP (2011) Mating skew in Barbary macaque males: the role of female mating synchrony, female behavior, and male-male coalitions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:167–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bromaghin JF, McDonald TL, Stirling I, Derocher AE, Richardson ES, Regehr EV, Douglas DC, Durner GM, Atwood TC, Amstrup SC (2015) Polar bear population dynamics in the southern Beaufort Sea during a period of sea ice decline. Ecol Appl 25:634–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert W, Ramsay MA (1998) Evaluation of age determination of polar bears by counts of cementum growth layer groups. Ursus 10:449–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmack EC, Macdonald RW (2002) Oceanography of the Canadian Shelf of the Beaufort Sea: a setting for marine life. Arctic 55:29–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin MA, Amstrup SC, Talbot SL, Sage GK, Amstrup KS (2009) Genetic variation, relatedness, and effective population size of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the southern Beaufort Sea, Alaska. J Hered 100:681–690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeMaster DP, Stirling I (1981) Ursus maritimus. Mamm Species 145:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE, Lunn NJ, Stirling I (2004) Polar bears in a warming climate. Integr Comp Biol 44:163–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE (2005) Population ecology of polar bears at Svalbard, Norway. Popul Ecol 47:267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE, Andersen M, Wiig Ø, Aars J (2010) Sexual dimorphism and the mating ecology of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) at Svalbard. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:939–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE, Stirling I (1995) Temporal variation in reproduction and body mass of polar bears in western Hudson Bay. Can J Zool 73:1657–1665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE, Stirling I (1998) Geographic variation in growth of polar bears (Ursus maritimus). J Zool 245:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE, Wiig Ø (2002) Postnatal growth in body length and mass of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) at Svalbard. J Zool 256:343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durner GM, Whiteman JP, Harlow HJ, Amstrup SC, Regehr EV, Ben-David M (2011) Consequences of long-distance swimming and travel over deep-water pack ice for a female polar bear during a year of extreme sea ice retreat. Polar Biol 34:975–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick C, Kyes R, Hunt K, Collins D, Durrant B, Wasser SK (2010) Methods of estrus detection and correlates of the reproductive cycle in the sun bear (Helarctos malayanus). Theriogenology 74:1121–1135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason JS, Rode KD (2009) Polar bear distribution and habitat association reflect long-term changes in fall sea ice conditions in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. Arctic 62:405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves BM (2007) Sexual selection effects on the evolution of senescence. Evol Ecol 21:663–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel S, Cote SD, Festa-Bianchet M (2010) Maternal characteristics and environment affect the costs of reproduction in female mountain goats. Ecology 91:2034–2043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hezel PJ, Zhang X, Bitz CM, Kelly BP, Massonnet F (2012) Projected decline in spring snow depth on Arctic sea ice caused by progressively later autumn open ocean freeze-up this century. Geophys Res Lett 39:L17505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter CM, Caswell H, Runge MC, Regehr EV, Amstrup SC, Stirling I (2010) Climate change threatens polar bear populations: a stochastic demographic analysis. Ecology 91:2883–2897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst RJ, Leonard ML, Watts PD, Beckerton P, Øritsland NA (1982) Polar bear locomotion: body temperature and energetic cost. Can J Zool 60:40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN/SSC Polar Bear Specialist Group (1991) Polar bears. in: Malyov, AV (ed) Proceedings of the tenth working meeting of the IUCN/SSC Polar Bear Specialist Group. IUCN Sochi, USSR.

  • IUCN/SSC Polar Bear Specialist Group (2010) Polar bears. In: Obbard ME, Thiemann GW, Peacock E, DeBruyn TD (eds) Proceedings to the 15th working meeting of the IUCN/SSC Polar Bear Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

  • Iversen M, Aars J, Haug T, Alsos IG, Lydersen C, Bachmann L, Kovacs KM (2013) The diet of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) from Svalbard, Norway, inferred from scat analysis. Polar Biol 36:561–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson M, Macnab R, Mayer L, Anderson R, Edwards M, Hatzky J, Schenke HW, Johnson P (2008) An improved bathymetric portrayal of the Arctic Ocean: implications for ocean modeling and geological, geophysical and oceanographic analyses. Geophys Res Lett 35:L07602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy ML, Nakazato T, Kennedy PK (2014) Geographic variation in sexual-size dimorphism of the American black bear (Ursus americanus) in areas of western North America. Mammalia 78:359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley MCS (1979) Fitting the von Bertalanffy growth equation to polar bear age-weight data. Can J Zool 57:1020–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunz TH, Wemmer C, Hayssen V (1996) Sex, age, and reproductive condition of mammals. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 279–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen T (1986) Population biology of the polar bear (Ursus maritimus) in the Svalbard area. Nor Polarinst Skr 184:1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentfer JW, Hensel RJ, Gilbert JR, Sorensen FE (1980) Population characteristics of Alaskan polar bears. Bears Biol Manag 4:109-115

    Google Scholar 

  • Lønø O (1970) The polar bear (Ursus maritimus Phipps) in the Svalbard area.

  • Mace RD, Waller JS (1997) Spatial and temporal interaction of male and female grizzly bears in northwestern Montana. J Wildl Manage 61:39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malenfant RM, Davis CS, Cullingham CI, Coltman DW (2016) Circumpolar genetic structure and recent gene flow of polar bears: a reanalysis. PLoS ONE 11:e0148967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McCall AG, Derocher AE, Lunn NJ (2015) Home range distribution of polar bears in western Hudson Bay. Polar Biol 38:343–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnár PK, Derocher AE, Thiemann GW, Lewis MA (2010) Predicting survival, reproduction and abundance of polar bears under climate change. Biol Conserv 143:1612–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnár PK, Derocher AE, Thiemann GW, Lewis MA (2014) Predicting survival, reproduction and abundance of polar bears under climate change (vol 143, pg 1612, 2010). Biol Conserv 177:230–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen L, Pilfold NW, Derocher AE, Stirling I, Bohart AM, Richardson E (2017) Ringed seal (Pusa hispida) tooth annuli as an index of reproduction in the Beaufort Sea. Ecol Indic 77:286–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orians GH (1969) On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. Am Nat 103:589–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen MA, Swaisgood RR, Slocomb C, Amstrup SC, Durner GM, Simac K, Pessier AP (2015) An experimental investigation of chemical communication in the polar bear. J Zool 295:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paetkau D, Amstrup SC, Born EW, Calvert W, Derocher AE, Garner GW, Messier F, Stirling I, Taylor MK, Wiig Ø, Stobeck C (1999) Genetic structure of the world's polar bear populations. Mol Ecol 8:1571–1584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson CL (2014) Spatially mapped reductions in the length of the Arctic sea ice season. Geophys Res Lett 41:4316–4322

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pilfold NW, Derocher AE, Richardson E (2014) Influence of intraspecific competition on the distribution of a wide-ranging, non-territorial carnivore. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:425–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilfold NW, McCall A, Derocher AE, Lunn NJ, Richardson E (2017) Migratory response of polar bears to sea ice loss: to swim or not to swim. Ecography 40:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plard F, Bonenfant C, Gaillard J-M (2011) Revisiting the allometry of antlers among deer species: male-male sexual competition as a driver. Oikos 120:601–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poerschmann U, Trillmich F, Mueller B, Wolf JBW (2010) Male reproductive success and its behavioural correlates in a polygynous mammal, the Galapagos sea lion (Zalophus wollebaeki). Mol Ecol 19:2574–2586

    Google Scholar 

  • Pongracz JD, Derocher AE (2017) Summer refugia of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the southern Beaufort Sea. Polar Biol 40:753–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Ramsay MA, Stirling I (1986) On the mating system of polar bears. Can J Zool 64:2142–2151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay MA, Stirling I (1988) Reproductive biology and ecology of female polar bears (Ursus maritimus). J Zool 214:601–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson ES (2014) The mating system and life history of the Polar bear. PhD thesis, Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB

  • Rode KD, Amstrup SC, Regehr EV (2010) Reduced body size and cub recruitment in polar bears associated with sea ice decline. Ecol Appl 20:768–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosing-Asvid A, Born EW, Kingsley MCS (2002) Age at sexual maturity of males and timing of the mating season of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in Greenland. Polar Biol 25:878–883

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuster SM, Wade MJ (2003) Mating systems and strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith TG (1980) Polar bear predation of ringed and bearded seals in the land-fast sea ice habitat. Can J Zool 58:2201–2209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TG, Aars J (2015) Polar bears (Ursus maritimus) mating during late June on the pack ice of northern Svalbard, Norway. Polar Res 34:25786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spady TJ, Lindburg DG, Durrant BS (2007) Evolution of reproductive seasonality in bears. Mammal Rev 37:21–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern HL, Laidre KL (2016) Sea-ice indicators of polar bear habitat. Cryosphere 10:2027–2041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I, Spencer C, Andriashek D (1989) Immobilization of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) with Telazol® in the Canadian Arctic. J Wildl Dis 25:159–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I, Andriashek D, Calvert W (1993) Habitat preferences of polar bears in the western Canadian Arctic in late winter and spring. Polar Rec 29:13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I (2002) Polar bears and seals in the eastern Beaufort Sea and Amundsen Gulf: a synthesis of population trends and ecological relationships over three decades. Arctic 55:59–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I, McDonald TL, Richardson ES, Regehr EV, Amstrup SC (2011) Polar bear population status in the northern Beaufort Sea, Canada, 1971–2006. Ecol Appl 21:859–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I, Spencer C, Andriashek D (2016) Behavior and activity budgets of wild breeding polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Mar Mammal Sci 32:13–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I, Archibald WR (1977) Aspects of predation of seals by polar bears. J Fish Res Board Can 34:1126–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I, Derocher AE (1990) Factors affecting the evolution and behavioral ecology of the modern bears. Bears Biol Manag 8:189–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I, Derocher AE (2012) Effects of climate warming on polar bears: a review of the evidence. Glob Change Biol 18:2694–2706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MK, McLoughlin PD, Messier F (2008) Sex-selective harvesting of polar bears Ursus maritimus. Wildl Biol 14:52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiemann GW, Lunn NJ, Richardson ES, Andriashek DS (2011) Temporal change in the morphometry–body mass relationship of polar bears. J Wildl Manage 75:580–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tryland M, Brun E, Derocher AE, Arnemo JM, Kierulf P, Ølberg R-A, Wiig Ø (2002) Plasma biochemical values from apparently healthy free-ranging polar bears from Svalbard. J Wildl Dis 38:566–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vongraven D, Derocher AE, Bohart AM (2018) Polar bear research: has science helped management and conservation? Environ Rev 26:358–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts P, Hansen S (1987) Cyclic starvation as a reproductive strategy in the polar bear. Symp Zool Soc Lond 57:305–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir LK, Grant JWA, Hutchings JA (2011) The influence of operational sex ratio on the intensity of competition for mates. Am Nat 177:167–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiig Ø, Gjertz I, Hansson R, Thomassen J (1992) Breeding behaviour of polar bears in Hornsund, Svalbard. Polar Rec 28:157–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeyl E, Aars J, Ehrich D, Bachmann L, Wiig Ø (2009) The mating system of polar bears: a genetic approach. Can J Zool 87:1195–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding to collect the data was made possible with support from ArcticNet, Canadian Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Canadian Wildlife Federation, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Hauser Bears, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Polar Bears International, Polar Continental Shelf Project, Quark Expeditions Ltd., United States Department of the Interior (Bureau of Ocean Energy Management), World Wildlife Fund (Canada), the Northwest Territories Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the National Fish and Wildlife Federation (Washington, DC, USA), US Geological Survey, and University of Alberta. David McGeachy kindly produced Fig. 1. We acknowledge the contributions of the many individuals involved in the collection of the data with particular thanks to Dennis Andriashek.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. A. Biddlecombe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Biddlecombe, B.A., Derocher, A.E., Richardson, E.S. et al. Behaviour and characteristics of mating polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Beaufort Sea, Canada. Polar Biol 42, 919–929 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-019-02485-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-019-02485-5

Keywords

Navigation