Skip to main content
Log in

Geographic morphological variation of Gentoo penguin (Pygoscelis papua) and sex identification: using morphometric characters and molecular markers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua have sexual dimorphism, which females have smaller morphological measurements than males. P. papua also shows a geographic morphological variation, decreasing in size toward southern latitudes. Therefore, morphological measurements may vary in space and overlap in the distribution of traits between females and males, which could lead to sex misidentification. A total of 300 blood samples and eight measurements and weight were obtained for Gentoo penguins from three localities in the South Shetland Islands and the Antarctic Peninsula. The molecular sex was identified for all individuals using two primer pairs (P2/P8 and PL/PR). We obtained higher success amplification for P2/P8 compared to PL/PR. We used 172 adults to create a morphological discriminant function using the backward stepwise method. We established a discriminant function for sex identification of each locality due to significant morphological differences found between sexes and between the three studied localities for adult Gentoo penguins. Using these functions, the percentages of individuals correctly assigned was 93.87 % in Ardley Island, 88.09 % in Bernardo O’Higgins, and 83.95 % in Gabriel Gonzalez Videla. The most southern locality studied was the most morphologically divergent from the others and with low divergence between sexes. Moreover, we also established a general function for the Gentoo penguin, which can be used to identify the sex of penguins from a broad number of localities. Therefore, molecular and biometric are useful techniques for sexing Gentoo penguins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen JA (1877) The influence of physical conditions in the genesis of species. Radic Rev 1:108–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Amat JA, Vinuela J, Ferrer M (1993) Sexing Chinstrap Penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) by morphological measurements. Colon Waterbirds 16:213–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnould JPY, Dann P, Cullen JM (2004) Determining the sex of Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) in northern Bass Strait using morphometric measurements. Emu 104:261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbraud C (2000) Natural selection on body size traits in a long-lived bird, the snow petrel Pagodroma nivea. J Evol Biol 13:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman C (1847) Über die Verhältnisse der Wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Göttinger Studien 3:595–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertellotti M, Tella JL, Godoy JA, Blanco G, Forero MG, Donázar JA, Ceballos O (2002) Determining sex of Magellanic Penguins using molecular procedures and discriminant functions. Waterbirds 25:479–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody JR, Kern SE (2004) Sodium boric acid: a Tris-free, cooler conductive medium for DNA electrophoresis. Biotechniques 36:214–216

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlini AR, Coria NR, Santos MM, Negrete J, Juares MA, Daneri GA (2009) Responses of Pygoscelis adeliae and P. papua populations to environmental changes at Isla 25 de Mayo (King George Island). Polar Biol 32:1427–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey AE, Jones KL, Sandercock BK, Wisely SM (2009) Heteroduplex molecules cause sexing errors in a standard molecular protocol for avian sexing. Mol Ecol Resour 9:61–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheney CA (1990) Spheniscus penguins: an overview of the world captive population. Spheniscus Penguin Newsl 3:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini V, Guaricci AC, Laricchiuta P, Rausa P, Lacalandra GM (2008) DNA sexing in Humboldt Penguins (Spheniscus humboldti) from feather samples. Anim Reprod Sci 106:162–167

    Google Scholar 

  • de Dinechin M, Dobson FS, Zehtindjiev P, Metcheva R, Couchoux C, Martin A, Quillfeldt P, Jouventin P (2012) The biogeography of Gentoo Penguins (Pygoscelis papua). Can J Zool 90:352–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forcada J, Trathan PN (2009) Penguin responses to climate change in the Southern Ocean. Glob Chang Biol 15:1618–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser WR, Trivelpiece WZ, Ainley D, Trivelpiece SG (1992) Increases in Antarctic penguin populations: reduced competition with whales or a loss of ice due to environmental warming? Polar Biol 11:525–531. doi:10.1007/BF00237945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridolfsson AK, Ellegren H (1999) A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol 30:116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gales R (1988) Sexing adult blue penguins by external measurements. Notornis 35:71–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandini PA, Frere E, Holik TM (1992) Implicancias de las diferencias en el tamaño corporal entre colonias para el uso de medidas morfométricas como método de sexado en Spheniscus magellanicus. Hornero 13:211–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJG (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7:1071–1075

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gross J, Ligges U (2012) Nortest: tests for normality. R package version 1.0-2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nortest

  • Hart T, Fitzcharles E, Trathan PN, Coulson T, Rogers AD (2009) Testing and improving the accuracy of discriminant function tests: a comparison between morphometric and molecular sexing in Macaroni Penguins. Waterbirds 32:437–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocken AG, Russel JJ (2002) A method for determination of gender from bill measurements in Otago blue penguins (Eudyptula minor). NZ J Zool 29:63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull CL (1996) Morphometric indices for sexing adult Royal Eudyptes schlegeli and Rockhopper E. chrysocome Penguins at Macquarie Island. Mar Ornithol 24:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerry KR, Agnew DJ, Clarke JR, Else GD (1992) Use of morphometric parameters for the determination of sex of Adelie penguins. Wildlife Res 19:657–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King JC (1994) Recent climate variability in the vicinity of the Antarctic Peninsula. Int J Climatol 14:357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K (2008) BIOSTATS Documentation. Department of environmental conservation. University of Massachusetts, Amherts

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno J, Barbosa A, De León A, Fargallo JA (1999) Phenotypic selection on morphology at Independence in the Chinstrap penguin Pygoscelis antarctica. J Evol Biol 12:507–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murie JO, Davis LS, McLean IG (1991) Identifying the sex of Fiordland Crested Penguins by morphometric characters. Notornis 38:233–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck LS, Clark MS, Clarke A, Cockell CS, Convey P, Detrich HW III, Fraser KPP, Johnston IA, Methe BA, Murray AE, Römisch K, Rogers AD (2005) Genomics: applications to Antarctic ecosystems. Polar Biol 28:351–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polito MJ, Clucas GV, Hart T, Trivelpiece WZ (2012) A simplified method of determining the sex of Pygoscelis penguins using bill measurements. Mar Ornithol 40:89–94

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL http://www.R-project.org/

  • Reis EC, Aires RM, Moura JF, Matias CA, Tavares M, Ott PH, Siciliano S, Lôbo-Hajdu G (2011) Molecular sexing of unusually large numbers of Spheniscus magellanicus (Spheniscidae) washed ashore along the Brazilian coast in 2008. Genet Mol Res 10:3731–3737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renner M, Davis LS (1999) Sexing Little Penguins Eudyptula minor from Cook Strait, New Zealand using discriminant function analysis. Emu 99:74–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renner M, Valencia J, Davis LS, Saez D, Cifuentes O (1998) Sexing of adult Gentoo Penguins in Antarctica using morphometrics. Colon Waterbirds 21:444–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo M, Szekely G (2012) Energy: E-statistics (energy statistics). R package version 1.4-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=energy

  • Robertson BC, Gemmell NJ (2006) PCR-based sexing in conservation biology: wrong answers from an accurate methodology? Conserv Genet 7:267–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez G (2012) DiscriMiner: tools of the trade for discriminant analysis. R package version 0.1-22. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DiscriMiner

  • Smith RC, Stammerjohn SE, Baker KS (1996) Surface air temperature variations in the western Antarctic Peninsula Region. Foundations for ecological research west of Antarctic Peninsula. Antarct Res Ser 70:105–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stonehouse B (1970) Geographic variation in gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua. Ibis 112:52–57. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1970.tb00075.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivelpiece WZ, Trivelpiece SG, Volman NJ (1987) Ecological segregation of Adélie, gentoo, and chinstrap penguins at King George Island, Antarctica. Ecology 68:351–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace RS, Dubach J, Michaels MG, Keuler NS, Diebold ED, Grzybowski K, Teare JA, Willis MJ (2008) Morphometric determination of gender in adult Humboldt Penguins (Spheniscus humboldti). Waterbirds 31:448–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Chen C, Lee H, Li S, Lir J, Chin S, Pu C, Wang C (2007) Sexing a wider range of avian species based on two CHD1 introns with a unified reaction condition. Zoo Biol 26:425–431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weihs C, Ligges U, Luebke K, Rabbe N (2005) klaR analyzing German business cycles. In: Baier D, Decker R, Schmidt-Thieme L (eds) Data analysis and decision support. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 335–343

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams TD (1990) Annual variation in breeding biology of Gentoo Penguins, Pygoscelis papua, at Bird Island, South Georgia. J Zool 222:247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R (1997) A method for restraining penguins. Mar Ornithol 25:72–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojczulanis-Jakubas K, Jakubas D, Welcker J, Harding AMA, Karnovsky NJ, Kidawa D, Steen H, Stempniewicz L, Camphuysen CJ (2011) Body size variation of a high-Arctic seabird: the dovekie (Alle alle). Polar Biol 34:847–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zavalaga CB, Paredes R (1997) Sex determination of adult Humboldt penguins using morphometric characters. J Field Ornithol 68:102–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Han J, Liu Q, Zhang J, Zhang X (2012) Sex Identification of Four Penguin Species using Locus-Specific PCR. Zoo Biol 32:257–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by Instituto Antártico Chileno (INACH-G_06-11; INACH-T-27-10 and INACH MG_02-12). D. Noll and B. Ramos for help in molecular procedures. L. Moreno and J. Hernandez for help in the field. F. Rengifo and N. Sallaberry for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juliana A. Vianna.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 60 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valenzuela-Guerra, P., Morales-Moraga, D., González-Acuña, D. et al. Geographic morphological variation of Gentoo penguin (Pygoscelis papua) and sex identification: using morphometric characters and molecular markers. Polar Biol 36, 1723–1734 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-013-1389-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-013-1389-2

Keywords

Navigation