Abstract
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are frequently treated with subcutaneous biologic therapies when disease progresses or when response to synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is inadequate. This study analyzed treatment persistence and treatment patterns for RA, AS, and PsA patients in Germany initiating subcutaneous biologic therapies with and without prior DMARDs use. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Electronic Medical Record database of IMS Disease Analyzer, Germany. Patients who were ≥18 years old; had at least one ICD-10 diagnosis code of RA, AS, or PsA during the study period; and had exposure to a subcutaneous biologic agent between January 1, 2009 and June 30, 2012 were selected. Patients were required to have continuous observation ≥12 months prior to and after index medication date. Persistence was defined as consecutive days from treatment initiation until treatment discontinuation (≥60-day lapse in medication coverage). Patients were stratified by pre-index use of DMARDs. Kaplan–Meier analysis was conducted to assess time to discontinuation, and logistic regression was conducted to identify characteristics associated with persistence. A total of 576 RA, 108 AS, and 197 PsA patients without biologic experience during the pre-index period were selected. The percentages of RA, AS, and PsA patients persistent ≥12 months were 51.9, 48.1, and 57.9 %, respectively. Median persistent time over 12 months was 365.0 days for RA (mean 245.9 days), 281.0 for AS (mean 228.5), and 365.0 for PsA (mean 264.1). In the RA cohort, a significantly higher proportion of those with pre-index DMARD use were persistent compared to those without pre-index DMARD (56.1 vs. 33.3 %, p = 0.0001). No significant differences were observed for the AS and PsA cohorts. Multivariate analyses confirmed that DMARD-experienced patients were 2.45 times more likely to be persistent with subcutaneous biologic therapy in the RA cohort. Switching between subcutaneous biologics occurred in <10 % of patients in all three cohorts. In the subpopulations with at least two prescriptions for the index subcutaneous biologic and who remained persistent on the index subcutaneous biologic, dose escalation of ≥50 % occurred in 50, 60, and 49 % in the RA, AS, and PsA cohorts, respectively. Among RA, AS, and PsA patients newly initiating subcutaneous biologic agents in Germany, persistence at 12 months is relatively low (48–58 %). For the RA cohort, patients with pre-index DMARD use are more persistent than patients without. The majority of patients do not switch between subcutaneous biologics. A notable proportion of patients who remained persistent on their index subcutaneous biologic had a dose escalation. There are opportunities to improve outcomes of patient with rheumatoid disease through improved medication persistence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee DM, Weinblatt ME (2001) Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 358(9285):903–911
Salaffi F, Carotti M, Gasparini S et al (2009) The health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis: a comparison with a selected sample of health people. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:25
Berdal G, Halvorsen S, Heijde D et al (2012) Restrictive pulmonary function is more prevalent in patients with ankylosing spondylitis than in matched population controls and is associated with impaired spinal mobility: a comparative study. Arthritis Res Therapy 14:R19
NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance 143. Adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for ankylosing spondylitis. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/TA143Guidance.pdf. Accessed on 4 June 2013
NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance 199. Etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/13110/50422/50422.pdf. Accessed on 4 June 2013
Smolen JS, Landewe R, Breedveld FC et al (2010) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis 69(6):964–975
Braun J, Berg R, Boehm H et al (2011) 2010 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 70:896–904
Gossec L, Smolen JS, Gaujoux-Viala C et al (2012) European league against rheumatism recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies. Ann Rheum Dis 71:4–12
Breedveld FC, Weisman MH, Kavanaugh AF et al (2006) The PREMIER study: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment. Arthritis Rheum 54(1):26–37
Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Ritchlin CT et al (2005) Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 52(10):3279–3289
Kavanaugh A, van der Heijde D, McInnes IB et al (2012) Golimumab in psoriatic arthritis: one-year clinical efficacy, radiographic, and safety results from a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 64(8):2504–2517
Mease PJ, Fleischmann R, Deodhar AA et al (2014) Effect of certolizumab pegol on signs and symptoms in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results of a Phase 3 double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study (RAPID-PsA). Ann Rheum Dis 73(1):48–55
Mease PJ, Goffe BS, Metz J et al (2000) Etanercept in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a randomised trial. Lancet 356(9227):385–390
Wolfe F (1995) The epidemiology of drug treatment failure in rheumatoid arthritis. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 9:619–632
Becher H, Kostev K, Schröder-Bernhardi D (2009) Validity and representativeness of the “Disease Analyzer” patient database for use in pharmacoepidemiological andpharmacoeconomic studies. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 47(10):617–626
Ogdie A, Langan SM, Parkinson J, Dattani H, Kostev K, Gelfand JM (2012) Medical Record Databases. In: Strom BL, Kimmel SE, Hennessy S (eds) Pharmacoepidemiology, 5th edn. Wiley, Oxford, pp 224–243
Buckley F, Finckh A, Huizinga TW et al (2015) Comparative efficacy of novel DMARDs as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to conventional DMARDs: a network meta-analysis. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 21(5):409–423
Rajzbaum G, Grados F, Evans D et al (2014) Treatment persistence and changes in fracture risk, back pain, and quality of life amongst patients treated with teriparatide in routine clinical care in France: results from the European forsteo observational study. Joint Bone Spine. 81(1):69–75
Colivicchi F, Bassi A, Santini M et al (2007) Discontinuation of statin therapy and clinical outcome after ischemic stroke. Stroke 38(10):2652–2657
Penning-van Beest FJ, Termorshuizen F, Goettsch WG et al (2007) Adherence to evidence-based statin guidelines reduces the risk of hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction by 40 %: a cohort study. Eur Heart J 28(2):154–159
Nam JL, Ramiro S, Gaujoux-Viala C, Takase K, Leon-Garcia M, Emery P, Gossec L, Landewe R, Smolen JS, Buch MH (2014) Efficacy of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the 2013 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 73(3):516–528
Degli Esposti L, Sangiorgi D, Perrone V, Radice S, Clementi E, Perone F, Buda S (2014) Adherence and resource use among patients treated with biologic drugs: findings from BEETLE study. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 18(6):401–407
Verstappen SM, Bijlsma JW, Verkleij H et al (2004) Overview of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis patients as observed in cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys. Arthritis Rheum 51:488–497
Cooper NJ (2000) Economic burden of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39:28–33
Mulottki K, Barton P, Tsourapas A et al. (2011) Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab, and abatacept for the tratement of rheumatoid arthritis aftterfailure of a tumor necrosiss factor inhibitor: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 15(14):1–278
Sofia De Achaval S, Suarez-Almazor ME (2010) Treatment adherence to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Clin Rheumtol. 5(3):313–326
Bartelds GM, Krieckaert CL, Nurmohamed MT et al (2011) Development of antidrug antibodies against adalimumab and association with disease activity and treatment failure during long-term follow-up. JAMA 305(14):1460–1468
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA. The sponsor was involved with the writing, study design, analysis, and interpretation of data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Dr. Jerrold Hill, Augstina Ogbonnaya, Prina Donga, and Charles Makin are employees of IMS Health, which was funded by Merck & Co. Inc. to conduct the design, management, and statistical analyses of the data as well as to prepare the study report. Dr. Sumesh Kachroo and Christopher M. Black are employees of Merck. Dr. Tao Fan, Dr. Qian Ding, and Ramon Lyu were employees of Merck at the time of this study.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyu, R., Govoni, M., Ding, Q. et al. Treatment persistence among patients with rheumatoid disease (RA, AS, PsA) treated with subcutaneous biologics in Germany. Rheumatol Int 36, 143–153 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-015-3348-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-015-3348-4