Abstract
We assessed the effectiveness of interferential current (IFC) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapies in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) compared with splint therapy, a standard treatment modality for CTS. This was a prospective, single-blinded, single-center, randomized, three-group parallel intervention study of 3 weeks duration. Efficacy was examined in the third week after the end of treatments. Subjects were assigned randomly to one of three groups: group I patients received splint therapy, group II patients received TENS applied on the palmar surface of the hand and the carpal tunnel, and group III patients underwent IFC therapy applied on the palmar surface of the hand and the volar surface of the forearm. TENS and ICF treatments were applied five times weekly for a total of 15 sessions. Group 1 patients were stabilized with volar wrist splints for 3 weeks. The efficacy of the therapies was assessed before initiation of therapy and at 3 weeks after completion of therapy using a visual analog scale (VAS), a symptom severity scale, the functional capacity scale of the BCTQ, and measurement of median nerve motor distal latency (mMDL) and median sensory nerve conduction velocity (mSNCV). Groups were compared pairwise using the Mann–Whitney U test to identify the source of differences between groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to analyze changes in variables over time within a group. In the VAS, BCTQ, MDL, and mSNCV, no significant difference was observed between the groups (p > 0.05). In the VAS, BCTQ, and mSNCV, statistically significant improvements were detected in all groups (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between TENS and splint therapy with respect to improvement in clinical scores, whereas IFC therapy provided a significantly greater improvement in VAS, mMDL, and mSNCV values than splint therapy (VAS: 4.80 ± 1.18 and 6.37 ± 1.18; p = 0.001, mMDL: 3.89 ± 0.88 and 4.06 ± 0.61; p = 0.001, mSNCV: 41.80 ± 1.76 and 40.75 ± 1.48; p = 0.010). IFC therapy provided a significantly greater improvement in VAS, symptom severity, functional capacity, and mMDL and mSNCV values than TENS therapy (VAS: 4.80 ± 1.18 and 6.68 ± 1.42; p < 0.001, symptom severity: 2.70 ± 1.03 and 3.37 ± 1.21; p = 0.015, functional capacity: 1.90 ± 1.21 and 2.50 ± 0.78; p = 0.039, mMDL: 3.89 ± 0.88 and 4.06 ± 0.88; p = 0.003, and mSNCV: 41.80 ± 1.76 and 41.38 ± 1.78; p = 0.021). IFC may be considered a new and safe therapeutic option for the treatment of CTS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tanaka S, Wild DK, Seligman PJ et al (1994) The US prevalence of self-reported carpal tunnel syndrome: 1988 national health interview survey data. Am J Public Health 84(11):1846–1848
Greer BG, Jenkins WM, Roberts R (1992) Carpal tunnel syndrome: a challenge for rehabilitation. J Rehabil 24(2):43–46
Piazzini DB, Aprile I, Ferrara PE et al (2007) A systematic review of conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rehabil 21(4):299–314
Kostopoulos D (2004) Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a review of the non-surgical approaches with emphasis in neural mobilization. J Bodyw Mov Ther 8:2–8
Naeser MA, Hahn KA, Lieberman BE, Branco KF (2002) Carpal tunnel syndrome pain treated with low-level laser and microamperes transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation: a controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83(7):978–988
Casale R, Damiani C, Maestri R, Wells CD (2013) Pain and electrophysiological parameters are improved by combined 830-1064 high-intensity LASER in symptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. A randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 49(2):205–211
Jarit GJ, Mohr KJ, Waller R, Glousman RE (2003) The effects of home interferential therapy on post-operative pain, edema, and range of motion of the knee. Clin J Sport Med 3(1):16–20
Facci LM, Nowotny JP, Tormem F, Trevisani VF (2011) Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential currents (IFC) in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med J 129(4):206–216
DeLisa JA, Mackenzie K, Baran EM (1994) Manual of nerve conduction velocity and clinical neurophysiology. Raven Press, New York
Casale R, Damiani C, Maestri R, Wells CD (2013) Pain and electrophysiological parameters are improved by combined 830-1064 high-intensity LASER in symptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation A randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 49:205–211
Facci LM, Nowotny JP, Tormem F, Trevisani VF (2011) Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential currents (IFC) in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med J 129(4):206–216
Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B (1983) The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 17:45–56
Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ et al (1993) A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Jt Surg Am 75(11):1585–1592
Manente G, Torrieri F, Di Balassio F, Staniscia T, Romano F, Uncini A (2001) An innovative hand brace for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Muscle Nerve 24:1020–1025
Akalin E, El O, Peker O (2002) Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome with nerve and tendon gliding exercises. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81(2):108–113
Canthen JC, Renner EJ (1975) Transcutaneus and peripheral nevre for chronic pain states. Surg Neurol 11:102–104
Meyler WJ, de Jongste MJ, Rolf CA (1994) Clinical evaluation of pain treatment with different pain syndromes. Clin J Pain 10:22–27
Chen ZQ, Xu W, Lin Y (1986) Identification of cortico-thalamic neurons: involvement of cortical descending modulation in acupuncture analgesia. J Tradit Chin Med 6(3):195–200
Naeser MA, Hahn K-AK, Lieberman BE et al (2002) Carpal tunnel syndrome pain treated with low-level laser and microamperes transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation: a controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:978–988
Casale R, Damiani C, Maestri R, Wells CD (2013) Pain and electrophysiological parameters are improved by combined 830-1064 high-intensity LASER in symptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation. A randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 49(2):205–211
Fuentes JP, Olivo SA, Magee DJ, Gross DP (2010) Effectiveness of interferential current therapy in the management of musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther 90(9):1219–1238
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koca, I., Boyaci, A., Tutoglu, A. et al. Assessment of the effectiveness of interferential current therapy and TENS in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled study. Rheumatol Int 34, 1639–1645 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-014-3005-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-014-3005-3