Abstract
In this review, we briefly summarize the current understanding of how fungal pathogens can persist antifungal treatment without heritable resistance mutations by forming tolerant persister cells. Fungal infections tolerant to antifungal treatment have become a major medical problem. One mechanism leading to drug recalcitrance is the formation of antifungal persister cells. These cells have wild-type genotype with the ability to survive exposure to antifungal agents due to changed membrane composition, upregulated stress response, and enhanced cell wall integrity. Knowledge of the mechanisms regulating entry and exit of the persister phenotype is limited, but it has recently been shown that the inhibition of the growth regulating TORC1 pathway induces fungal persistence. The phenotypic properties of persister cells and the involvement of the TORC1 pathway indicate that persister cells are quiescent in G0 of the cell cycle. This knowledge leads us to suggest that the identified shared drug-tolerance mechanisms of persister and quiescent cells may serve as a foundation for developing novel treatment strategies that are independent of growth mode against systemic fungal infections.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen C et al (2006) Isolation of quiescent and nonquiescent cells from yeast stationary-phase cultures. J Cell Biol 174:89–100. doi:10.1083/jcb.200604072
Allison KR, Brynildsen MP, Collins JJ (2011) Metabolite-enabled eradication of bacterial persisters by aminoglycosides. Nature 473:216–220. doi:10.1038/Nature10069
Aragon AD et al (2008) Characterization of differentiated quiescent and nonquiescent cells in yeast stationary-phase cultures. Mol Biol Cell 19:1271–1280. doi:10.1091/mbc.E07-07-0666
Bojsen R, Regenberg B, Folkesson A (2014) Saccharomyces cerevisiae biofilm tolerance towards systemic antifungals depends on growth phase. BMC Microbiol 14:305. doi:10.1186/s12866-014-0305-4
Bojsen R, Regenberg B, Gresham D, Folkesson A (2016) A common mechanism involving the TORC1 pathway can lead to amphotericin B-persistence in biofilm and planktonic Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations. Sci Rep 6:21874. doi:10.1038/srep21874
Brauer MJ et al (2008) Coordination of growth rate, cell cycle, stress response, and metabolic activity in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 19:352–367
De Virgilio C, Loewith R (2006) Cell growth control: little eukaryotes make big contributions. Oncogene 25:6392–6415. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209884
Dworkin J, Shah IM (2010) Exit from dormancy in microbial organisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:890–896. doi:10.1038/Nrmicro2453
Gray JV, Petsko GA, Johnston GC, Ringe D, Singer RA, Werner-Washburne M (2004) “Sleeping beauty”: quiescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68:187–206. doi:10.1128/MMBR.68.2.187-206.2004
Gray KC, Palacios DS, Dailey I, Endo MM, Uno BE, Wilcock BC, Burke MD (2012) Amphotericin primarily kills yeast by simply binding ergosterol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:2234–2239. doi:10.1073/pnas.1117280109
Grillot R, Lebeau B (2005) Systemic antifungal agents. In: Bryskier A (ed) Antimicrobial agents: antibacterials and antifungals. ASM Press, Washington DC, pp 1260–1287
Ho YH, Gasch AP (2015) Exploiting the yeast stress-activated signaling network to inform on stress biology and disease signaling. Curr Genet 61:503–511
Hof H (2008) Is there a serious risk of resistance development to azoles among fungi due to the widespread use and long-term application of azole antifungals in medicine? Drug Resist Updat 11:25–31. doi:10.1016/j.drup.2008.01.001
Khot PD, Suci PA, Miller RL, Nelson RD, Tyler BJ (2006) A small subpopulation of blastospores in Candida albicans biofilms exhibit resistance to amphotericin B associated with differential regulation of ergosterol and beta-1,6-glucan pathway genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:3708–3716. doi:10.1128/AAC.00997-06
Klosinska MM, Crutchfield CA, Bradley PH, Rabinowitz JD, Broach JR (2011) Yeast cells can access distinct quiescent states. Genes Dev 25:336–349. doi:10.1101/gad.2011311
LaFleur MD, Kumamoto CA, Lewis K (2006) Candida albicans biofilms produce antifungal-tolerant persister cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:3839–3846. doi:10.1128/AAC.00684-06
Lafleur MD, Qi Q, Lewis K (2010) Patients with long-term oral carriage harbor high-persister mutants of Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:39–44. doi:10.1128/AAC.00860-09
Laporte D, Lebaudy A, Sahin A, Pinson B, Ceschin J, Daignan-Fornier B, Sagot I (2011) Metabolic status rather than cell cycle signals control quiescence entry and exit. J Cell Biol 192:949–957. doi:10.1083/jcb.201009028
Lempiainen H, Shore D (2009) Growth control and ribosome biogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21:855–863. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2009.09.002
Levin BR, Rozen DE (2006) Non-inherited antibiotic resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:556–562
Lewis K (2010) Persister cells. Annu Rev Microbiol 64:357–372. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134306
Li P, Seneviratne CJ, Alpi E, Vizcaino JA, Jin LJ (2015) Delicate metabolic control and coordinated stress response critically determine antifungal tolerance of Candida albicans biofilm persisters. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:6101–6112. doi:10.1128/Aac.00543-15
Loewith R, Hall MN (2011) Target of rapamycin (TOR) in nutrient signaling and growth control. Genetics 189:1177–1201. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.133363
Low C-Y, Rotstein C (2011) Emerging fungal infections in immunocompromised patients F1000. Med Rep 3:14. doi:10.3410/m3-14
Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M (2003) The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med 348:1546–1554. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa022139
Martinez MJ et al (2004) Genomic analysis of stationary-phase and exit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: gene expression and identification of novel essential genes. Mol Biol Cell 15:5295–5305. doi:10.1091/mbc.E03-11-0856
Mesa-Arango AC, Scorzoni L, Zaragoza O (2012) It only takes one to do many jobs: amphotericin B as antifungal and immunomodulatory drug. Front Microbiol 3:286
Mukherjee PK, Chandra J, Kuhn DM, Ghannoum MA (2003) Mechanism of fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans biofilms: phase-specific role of efflux pumps and membrane sterols. Infect Immun 71:4333–4340
Mulcahy LR, Burns JL, Lory S, Lewis K (2010) Emergence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains producing high levels of persister cells in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Bacteriol 192:6191–6199. doi:10.1128/JB.01651-09
Ortiz-Urquiza A, Keyhani NO (2015) Stress response signaling and virulence: insights from entomopathogenic fungi. Curr Genet 61:239–249
Pardee AB (1974) A restriction point for control of normal animal cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 71:1286–1290
Perlin DS (2011) Current perspectives on echinocandin class drugs. Future Microbiol 6:441–457. doi:10.2217/fmb.11.19
Regenberg B et al (2006) Growth-rate regulated genes have profound impact on interpretation of transcriptome profiling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol 7:R107
Waldorf AR, Polak A (1983) Mechanisms of action of 5-fluorocytosine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 23:79–85
Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB (2004) Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis 39:309–317. doi:10.1086/421946
Zaragoza D, Ghavidel A, Heitman J, Schultz MC (1998) Rapamycin induces the G0 program of transcriptional repression in yeast by interfering with the TOR signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biol 18:4463–4470
Zilberberg MD, Shorr AF, Kollef MH (2008) Secular trends in candidemia-related hospitalization in the United States, 2000–2005. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 29:978–980. doi:10.1086/591033
Acknowledgments
Danish Agency for Science Technology and Innovation is acknowledged for financial support (FTP 10-084027).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by M. Kupiec.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bojsen, R., Regenberg, B. & Folkesson, A. Persistence and drug tolerance in pathogenic yeast. Curr Genet 63, 19–22 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-016-0613-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-016-0613-3