Skip to main content
Log in

Pathogenetische Aspekte bei Vorläuferläsionen gastrointestinaler Tumoren

Pathogenetic aspects in precursor lesions of gastrointestinal tumors

  • Hauptreferate: Aktuelle Habilitationen
  • Published:
Der Pathologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Pathogenese von Vorläuferläsionen gastrointestinaler Tumoren präsentiert sich auf vielfache Weise. Im Ösophagus wird die Genexpression aberranter intestinaler Transkriptionsfaktoren wie CDX2 entscheidend durch Milieufaktoren beeinflusst. Von Dysplasien innerhalb der Barrett-Mukosa bis hin zum Adenokarzinom lassen sich in der diagnostisch einsetzbaren Vierfach-Multicolor-Fluoreszenz-in-situ-Hybridisierung (FISH) prognostische Markerkombinationen auf chromosomaler Ebene finden. In der gastralen Karzinogenesesequenz ist die Genexpression von CDX1 regulativ abhängig von der Wechselwirkung zwischen Inflammation und Promotormethylierung. Im Kolon zeigt das sessil serratierte Adenom eine Sequenz initialer BRAF-Mutation und erst spät einsetzender MLH1-Methylierung mit konsekutivem Entartungspotenzial. Parallel dazu steigt die Anzahl intraepithelialer Lymphozyten als gewohnt einfach anwendbares HE-basiertes Kriterium an. Mithilfe von Next-generation-sequencing(NGS)-Untersuchungen erstreckt sich das Spektrum an Keimbahnmutationen in Mismatchrepair-Genen als auch im APC-Gen in Bereiche geringer Penetranz, die hinsichtlich ihres Risikos stratifiziert werden sollten. Genetik, Phänotyp und Terminologie der gastrointestinalen Vorläuferläsionen verschmelzen so zu einem sich gegenseitig bedingenden Konzept innerhalb der Medizin.

Abstract

The pathogenesis of precursor lesions of gastrointestinal tumors is manifested in many ways. In the esophagus an aberrant genetic expression of intestinal transcription factors, such as CDX2 is initiated by local environment factors. During the subsequent dysplasia to carcinoma sequence, chromosomal gain and loss of genes occurs. A 4-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay can be applied in dysplasia as well as in Barrett’s adenocarcinoma to define prognostic marker combinations. In the gastric carcinogenesis sequence the gene expression of CDX1 is regulatively dependent on an interplay between inflammation and promotor methylation. In the colon sessile serrated adenomas show a sequence with initial BRAF mutation and late onset of MLH1 promotor hypermethylation with consecutive potential cancer progression. This event is accompanied by an increase of intraepithelial lymphocytes, which is an easy to use tool for routine diagnostics using H&E sections. Next generation sequencing (NGS) investigations of germline mutations in colorectal cancer revealed a spectrum of mutations with low penetration in the field of mismatch repair proteins as well as the APC gene. An individual risk stratification for penetration of these germline mutations is necessary. In conclusion, genetics, phenotypes and terminology of gastrointestinal precursor lesions are unified to a mutually influencing concept within medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Zavoral M, Suchanek S, Zavada F, Dusek L, Muzik J, Seifert B, Fric P (2009) Colorectal cancer screening in Europe. World J Gastroenterol 15(47):5907–5915

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hewett DG, Rex DK (2015) The big picture: does colonoscopy work? Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 25(2):403–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saraggi D, Fassan M, Bornschein J, Farinati F, Realdon S, Valeri N, Rugge M (2016) From Barrett metaplasia to esophageal adenocarcinoma: the molecular background. Histol Histopathol 31(1):25–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burnat G, Rau T, Elshimi E, Hahn EG, Konturek PC (2007) Bile acids induce overexpression of homeobox gene CDX-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in human Barrett’s esophageal mucosa and adenocarcinoma cell line. Scand J Gastroenterol 42(12):1460–1465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Geppert CI, Rummele P, Sarbia M, Langer R, Feith M, Morrison L, Pestova E, Schneider-Stock R, Hartmann A, Rau TT (2014) Multi-colour FISH in oesophageal adenocarcinoma-predictors of prognosis independent of stage and grade. Br J Cancer 110(12):2985–2995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Correa P, Piazuelo MB (2012) The gastric precancerous cascade. J Dig Dis 13(1):2–9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Weis VG, Goldenring JR (2009) Current understanding of SPEM and its standing in the preneoplastic process. Gastric Cancer 12(4):189–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stairs DB, Kong J, Lynch JP (2010) Cdx genes, inflammation, and the pathogenesis of intestinal metaplasia. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 96:231–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rau TT, Rogler A, Frischauf M, Jung A, Konturek PC, Dimmler A, Faller G, Sehnert B, El-Rifai W, Hartmann A et al (2012) Methylation-dependent activation of CDX1 through NF-kappaB: a link from inflammation to intestinal metaplasia in the human stomach. Am J Pathol 181(2):487–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mihalache L, Gherasim A, Nita O, Ungureanu MC, Padureanu SS, Gavril RS, Arhire LI (2016) Effects of ghrelin in energy balance and body weight homeostasis. Hormones 15(2):186–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen CY, Tsai CY (2012) Ghrelin and motilin in the gastrointestinal system. Curr Pharm Des 18(31):4755–4765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rau TT, Sonst A, Rogler A, Burnat G, Neumann H, Oeckl K, Neuhuber W, Dimmler A, Faller G, Brzozowski T et al (2013) Gastrin mediated down regulation of ghrelin and its pathophysiological role in atrophic gastritis. J Physiol Pharmacol 64(6):719–725

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, Kern SE, Preisinger AC, Leppert M, Nakamura Y, White R, Smits AM, Bos JL (1988) Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med 319(9):525–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibson JA, Odze RD (2016) Pathology of premalignant colorectal neoplasia. Dig Endosc 28(3):312–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aust DE, Baretton GB, Members of the Working Group GIPotGSoP (2010) Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum (hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas, traditional serrated adenomas, and mixed polyps)-proposal for diagnostic criteria. Virchows Arch 457(3):291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rau TT, Agaimy A, Gehoff A, Geppert C, Jung K, Knobloch K, Langner C, Lugli A, Groenbus-Lurkin I, Nagtegaal ID et al (2014) Defined morphological criteria allow reliable diagnosis of colorectal serrated polyps and predict polyp genetics. Virchows Arch 464(6):663–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rau TT, Atreya R, Aust DE, Baretton GB, Eck M, Erlenbach-Wunsch K, Hartmann A, Lugli A, Stohr R, Vieth M et al (2016) Inflammatory response in serrated precursor lesions of the colon classified according to WHO entities, clinical parameters and phenotype-genotype correlation. J Pathol Clin Res 2(2):113–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldstein NS (2006) Small colonic microsatellite unstable adenocarcinomas and high-grade epithelial dysplasias in sessile serrated adenoma polypectomy specimens: a study of eight cases. Am J Clin Pathol 125(1):132–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sheridan TB, Fenton H, Lewin MR, Burkart AL, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Frankel WL, Montgomery E (2006) Sessile serrated adenomas with low- and high-grade dysplasia and early carcinomas: an immunohistochemical study of serrated lesions „caught in the act“. Am J Clin Pathol 126(4):564–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tiwari AK, Roy HK, Lynch HT (2016) Lynch syndrome in the 21st century: clinical perspectives. QJM 109(3):151–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kraus C, Rau TT, Lux P, Erlenbach-Wunsch K, Lohr S, Krumbiegel M, Thiel CT, Stohr R, Agaimy A, Croner RS et al (2015) Comprehensive screening for mutations associated with colorectal cancer in unselected cases reveals penetrant and nonpenetrant mutations. Int J Cancer 136(6):E559–E568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Rau.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

T. Rau gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine vom Autor durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

The supplement containing this article is not sponsored by industry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rau, T. Pathogenetische Aspekte bei Vorläuferläsionen gastrointestinaler Tumoren. Pathologe 37 (Suppl 2), 186–190 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-016-0220-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-016-0220-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation