Skip to main content
Log in

Coping with production time variability via dynamic lead-time quotation

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose two dynamic lead-time quotation policies in an M/GI/1 type make-to-stock queueing system serving lead-time sensitive customers with a single type of product. Incorporating non-exponential service times in an exact method for make-to-stock queues is usually deemed difficult. Our analysis of the proposed policies is exact and requires the numerical inversion of the Laplace transform of the sojourn time of an order to be placed. The first policy assures that the long-run probability of delivering the product within the quoted lead-time is the same for all backlogged customers. The second policy is a refinement of the first which improves the profitability if customers are oversensitive to even short delays in delivery. Numerical results show that both policies perform close to the optimal policy that was characterized only for exponential service times. The new insight gained is that the worsening impact of the production time variability, which is felt significantly in systems accepting all customers by quoting zero lead times, decreases when dynamic lead-time quotation policies are employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abate J, Whitt W (1995) Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms of probability distributions. ORSA J Comput 7:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abouee-Mehrizi H, Baron O (2015) State-dependent \(M/G/1\) queueing systems. Queueing Syst (forthcoming)

  • Çelik S, Maglaras C (2008) Pricing and lead-time quotation for a multiclass make-to-order queue. Manag Sci 54(6):1132–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellaert NP (1991) Due-date setting and production control. Int J Prod Econ 23:59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duenyas I (1995) Single facility due date setting with multiple customer classes. Manag Sci 41(4):608–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duenyas I, Hopp WJ (1995) Quoting customer lead times. Manag Sci 41(1):43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economou A, Manou A (2015) A probabilistic approach for the analysis of the \(M_n/G/1\) queue. Ann Oper Res (forthcoming)

  • Elhafsi M (2000) An operational decision model for lead-time and price quotation in congested manufacturing systems. Eur J Oper Res 126(2):355–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallien J, Tallec YL, Shoenmeyr T (2004) A model for make-to-order revenue management. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

  • Gross D, Harris CM (1998) Fundamentals of queueing theory. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopp WJ, Sturgis MR (2001) A simple, robust leadtime-quoting policy. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 3(4):321–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagerman DL (1982) An inversion technique for the Laplace transform. Bell Syst Tech J 61(8):1995–2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagerman DL, Melamed B (2003) Models and approximations for call center design. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 5(2):159–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapuscinski R, Tayur S (2007) Reliable due-date setting in a capacitated MTO system with two customer classes. Oper Res 55(1):56–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerner Y (2008) The conditional distribution of the residual service time in the \(M_n/G/1\) queue. Stoch Model 24:364–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskinocak P, Ravi R, Tayur S (2001) Scheduling and reliable lead-time quotation for orders with availability intervals and lead-time sensitive revenues. Manag Sci 47(2):264–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence SR (1995) Estimating flowtimes and setting due-dates in complex production systems. IIE Trans 27:657–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L (1992) The role of inventory in delivery-time competition. Manag Sci 38(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J-W (2003) Improving the performance of job shop manufacturing with demand-pull production control by reducing set-up/processing time variability. Int J Prod Econ 84(3):255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin BMT (2001) Scheduling in the two-machine flowshop with due date constraints. Int J Prod Econ 70:117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopalan S (2002) Make to order or make to stock: model and application. Manag Sci 48(2):241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanajian N, Balcıoglu B (2009) The impact of production time variability on make-to-stock queue performance. Eur J Oper Res 194:847–855

  • Savaşaneril S, Griffin PM, Keskinocak P (2010) Dynamic lead-time quotation for an \(M/M/1\) base-stock inventory queue. Oper Res 58(2):383–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slotnick SA, Sobel MJ (2005) Manufacturing lead-time rules: customer retention versus tardiness costs. Eur J Oper Res 163(3):825–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • So KC, Song J-S (1998) Price, delivery time guarantees and capacity selection. IIE Trans 111:28–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman ML, Zhang RQ (1999) Optimal lead time policies. Manag Sci 45(2):290–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unal AT, Uzsoy R, Kiran AS (1997) Rescheduling on a single machine with part-type dependent setup times and deadlines. Ann Oper Res 70:93–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wein LM (1991) Due-date setting and priority sequencing in a multiclass \(M/G/1\) queue. Manag Sci 37(7):834–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by TÜBİTAK, The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, under the Grant No. 213M428. We would like to thank Seçil Savaşaneril who provided us with their numerical results and answered our questions whenever we needed clarifications on their paper. We would also like to extend our thanks to Gabor Rudolf, Mustafa Yavaş and Şafak Yücel who have helped us at several stages of our research. The authors thank the two anonymous referees and the editors for their invaluable suggestions to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barış Balcıog̃lu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kahveciog̃lu, G., Balcıog̃lu, B. Coping with production time variability via dynamic lead-time quotation. OR Spectrum 38, 877–898 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-015-0425-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-015-0425-8

Keywords

Navigation