Skip to main content
Log in

Short-term space allocation for storage yard management in a transshipment hub port

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In transshipment ports, the containers to the same destination vessel are usually stored together to facilitate the loading process, which is called the “consignment”. During operation, the actual containers that will come in are only known for a short period in advance. Thus, short-term space allocation is needed to assign incoming containers taking into account the transporting vehicles, yard cranes and storage space. Currently, the space is allocated based on the experience of port operators. To balance the current and future impacts of short-term planning, we develop a systematic method called “space allocation given long-term plan (SALP)”. The corresponding MIP model is formulated to utilize not only the short-term information, which includes the existing containers and the actual incoming containers, but also the given long-term plan, which provides a forecast of future requirements. The SALP method is evaluated under two storage strategies to achieve consignment, namely, the “non-sharing strategy” and the “flexible space-sharing strategy”. The numerical experiments show that the SALP method improves operational efficiency, but its performance is affected by the portion of long-term plan under consideration. The SALP method performs well under both storage strategies when space is sufficient. However, the performance under the “flexible space-sharing strategy” is better than the “non-sharing strategy” when space is tight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caserta M, Voß S, Sniedovich M (2011) Applying the corridor method to a blocks relocation problem. OR Spectr 33:915–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caserta M, Schwarze S, Voß S (2012) A mathematical formulation and complexity considerations for the blocks relocation problem. Eur J Oper Res 219:96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choe R, Park T, Oh M-S, Kang J, Ryu KR (2011) Generating a rehandling-free intra-block remarshaling plan for an automated container yard. J Intell Manuf 22:201–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Castilho B, Daganzo CF (1993) Handling strategies for import containers at marine terminals. Transp Res Part B 27:151–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Lee LH, Chew EP, Tan KC (2008) A yard storage strategy for minimizing traffic congestion in a marine container transshipment hub. OR Spectr 30:697–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang X, Lee LH, Chew EP, Tan KC, Han Y (2012) A container yard storage strategy for improving land utilization and operation efficiency in a transshipment hub port. Eur J Oper Res 211:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang X, Chew EP, Lee LH, Tan KC (2013) Flexible space-sharing strategy for storage yard management in a transshipment hub port. OR Spectr 35:417–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH (1997) Evaluation of the number of reshuffles in storage yards. Comput Ind Eng 32:701–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH, Bae JW (1998) Re-marshalling export containers in port container terminals. Comput Ind Eng 35:655–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH, Hong GP (2006) A heuristic rule for relocating blocks. Comput Oper Res 33:940–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH, Kim HB (1999) Segregating space allocation models for container inventories in port container terminals. Int J Prod Econ 59:415–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH, Park KT (2003) A note on a dynamic space-allocation method for outbound containers. Eur J Oper Res 148:92–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH, Park YM, Ryu KR (2000) Deriving decision rules to locate export containers in container yards. Eur J Oper Res 124:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang J, Ryu KR, Kim KH (2006) Deriving stacking strategies for export containers with uncertain weight information. J Intell Manuf 17:399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ku LP, Lee LH, Chew EP, Tan KC (2010) An optimization framework for yard planning in a container terminal: case with automated rail-mounted gantry cranes. OR Spectr 32:519–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee LH, Chew EP, Tan KC, Han Y (2006) An optimization model for storage yard management in transshipment hubs. OR Spectr 28:539–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Y, Hsu NY (2007) An optimization model for the container pre-marshalling problem. Comput Oper Res 34:3295–3313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim A, Xu Z (2006) A critical-shaking neighborhood search for the yard allocation problem. Eur J Oper Res 174:1247–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sculli D, Hui CF (1988) Three dimensional stacking of containers. Omega Int J Manag Sci 16:585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenken D, Voß S, Stahlbock R (2004) Container terminal operation and operations research—a classification and literature review. OR Spectr 26:3–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahlbock R, Voß S (2008) Operations research at container terminals: a literature update. OR Spectr 20:1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb-Ibrahimi M, De Castilho B, Daganzo CF (1993) Storage space vs handling work in container terminals. Transp Res Part B 27:13–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vis IFA, de Koster R (2003) Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: an overview. Eur J Oper Res 147:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan Y, Liu J, Tsai PC (2009) The assignment of storage locations to containers for a container stack. Naval Res Logist 56:699–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe I (1991) Characteristics and analysis method of efficiencies of container terminal: an approach to the optimal loading/unloading method. Contain Age 3:36–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Liu J, Murty KG, Linn RJ (2003) Storage space allocation in container terminals. Transp Res B 37:883–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research supported by the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinjia Jiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, X., Chew, E.P., Lee, L.H. et al. Short-term space allocation for storage yard management in a transshipment hub port. OR Spectrum 36, 879–901 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-014-0366-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-014-0366-7

Keywords

Navigation