Abstract
In transshipment ports, the containers to the same destination vessel are usually stored together to facilitate the loading process, which is called the “consignment”. During operation, the actual containers that will come in are only known for a short period in advance. Thus, short-term space allocation is needed to assign incoming containers taking into account the transporting vehicles, yard cranes and storage space. Currently, the space is allocated based on the experience of port operators. To balance the current and future impacts of short-term planning, we develop a systematic method called “space allocation given long-term plan (SALP)”. The corresponding MIP model is formulated to utilize not only the short-term information, which includes the existing containers and the actual incoming containers, but also the given long-term plan, which provides a forecast of future requirements. The SALP method is evaluated under two storage strategies to achieve consignment, namely, the “non-sharing strategy” and the “flexible space-sharing strategy”. The numerical experiments show that the SALP method improves operational efficiency, but its performance is affected by the portion of long-term plan under consideration. The SALP method performs well under both storage strategies when space is sufficient. However, the performance under the “flexible space-sharing strategy” is better than the “non-sharing strategy” when space is tight.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Caserta M, Voß S, Sniedovich M (2011) Applying the corridor method to a blocks relocation problem. OR Spectr 33:915–929
Caserta M, Schwarze S, Voß S (2012) A mathematical formulation and complexity considerations for the blocks relocation problem. Eur J Oper Res 219:96–104
Choe R, Park T, Oh M-S, Kang J, Ryu KR (2011) Generating a rehandling-free intra-block remarshaling plan for an automated container yard. J Intell Manuf 22:201–217
De Castilho B, Daganzo CF (1993) Handling strategies for import containers at marine terminals. Transp Res Part B 27:151–166
Han Y, Lee LH, Chew EP, Tan KC (2008) A yard storage strategy for minimizing traffic congestion in a marine container transshipment hub. OR Spectr 30:697–720
Jiang X, Lee LH, Chew EP, Tan KC, Han Y (2012) A container yard storage strategy for improving land utilization and operation efficiency in a transshipment hub port. Eur J Oper Res 211:64–73
Jiang X, Chew EP, Lee LH, Tan KC (2013) Flexible space-sharing strategy for storage yard management in a transshipment hub port. OR Spectr 35:417–439
Kim KH (1997) Evaluation of the number of reshuffles in storage yards. Comput Ind Eng 32:701–711
Kim KH, Bae JW (1998) Re-marshalling export containers in port container terminals. Comput Ind Eng 35:655–658
Kim KH, Hong GP (2006) A heuristic rule for relocating blocks. Comput Oper Res 33:940–954
Kim KH, Kim HB (1999) Segregating space allocation models for container inventories in port container terminals. Int J Prod Econ 59:415–423
Kim KH, Park KT (2003) A note on a dynamic space-allocation method for outbound containers. Eur J Oper Res 148:92–101
Kim KH, Park YM, Ryu KR (2000) Deriving decision rules to locate export containers in container yards. Eur J Oper Res 124:89–101
Kang J, Ryu KR, Kim KH (2006) Deriving stacking strategies for export containers with uncertain weight information. J Intell Manuf 17:399–410
Ku LP, Lee LH, Chew EP, Tan KC (2010) An optimization framework for yard planning in a container terminal: case with automated rail-mounted gantry cranes. OR Spectr 32:519–541
Lee LH, Chew EP, Tan KC, Han Y (2006) An optimization model for storage yard management in transshipment hubs. OR Spectr 28:539–561
Lee Y, Hsu NY (2007) An optimization model for the container pre-marshalling problem. Comput Oper Res 34:3295–3313
Lim A, Xu Z (2006) A critical-shaking neighborhood search for the yard allocation problem. Eur J Oper Res 174:1247–1259
Sculli D, Hui CF (1988) Three dimensional stacking of containers. Omega Int J Manag Sci 16:585–594
Steenken D, Voß S, Stahlbock R (2004) Container terminal operation and operations research—a classification and literature review. OR Spectr 26:3–49
Stahlbock R, Voß S (2008) Operations research at container terminals: a literature update. OR Spectr 20:1–52
Taleb-Ibrahimi M, De Castilho B, Daganzo CF (1993) Storage space vs handling work in container terminals. Transp Res Part B 27:13–32
Vis IFA, de Koster R (2003) Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: an overview. Eur J Oper Res 147:1–16
Wan Y, Liu J, Tsai PC (2009) The assignment of storage locations to containers for a container stack. Naval Res Logist 56:699–713
Watanabe I (1991) Characteristics and analysis method of efficiencies of container terminal: an approach to the optimal loading/unloading method. Contain Age 3:36–47
Zhang C, Liu J, Murty KG, Linn RJ (2003) Storage space allocation in container terminals. Transp Res B 37:883–903
Acknowledgments
Research supported by the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, X., Chew, E.P., Lee, L.H. et al. Short-term space allocation for storage yard management in a transshipment hub port. OR Spectrum 36, 879–901 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-014-0366-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-014-0366-7