Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A phase 0 clinical trial of novel candidate extended-release formulations of capecitabine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of several candidate extended-release (ER) formulations of capecitabine in patients.

Methods

In a phase 0 clinical study, PK profiles of several oral candidate ER formulations of capecitabine were compared to the PK profile of capecitabine after administration of the commercially available immediate-release (IR) tablet. A single dose of 1000 mg IR formulation (two 500 mg tablets) was administered on day 1, and a single dose of a 1000 mg candidate ER formulation of capecitabine (two 500 mg tablets) was administered on day 2. Candidate ER formulations of capecitabine differed with regard to the amount of the ER excipient (Kollidon® SR) in tablet matrix (0–5 % w/w) and coating (0–12 mg/cm2).

Results

PK profiles of nine different candidate ER formulations were examined. The tablet coating seemed the main determinant for ER of capecitabine and tablet integrity. Average (±standard deviation) AUC0–2h, relative to AUC0–2h after oral administration of the IR tablet, were 43.3 % (±34.9 %) and 1.2 % (±1.2 %) for candidate ER formulations coated with 3 and 6 mg/cm2, respectively. Corresponding AUC0–last were 93.6 % (±40.2 %) and 44.0 % (±5.4 %).

Conclusion

Modulation of capecitabine release in patients can be accomplished by varying tablet coating content. Proof of principle was demonstrated for candidate ER formulations with coating content of 3 mg/cm2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schellens JHM (2007) Capecitabine. Oncologist 12:152–155. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.12-2-152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Midgley R, Kerr DJ (2009) Capecitabine: have we got the dose right? Nat Clin Pract Oncol 6:17–24. doi:10.1038/ncponc1240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Budman DR, Meropol NJ, Reigner B et al (1998) Preliminary studies of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate: capecitabine. J Clin Oncol 16:1795–1802

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mackean M, Planting A, Twelves C et al (1998) Phase I and pharmacologic study of intermittent twice-daily oral therapy with capecitabine in patients with advanced and/or metastatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2977–2985

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reigner B, Blesch K, Weidekamm E (2001) Clinical pharmacokinetics of capecitabine. Clin Pharmacokinet 40:85–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Bono JS, Twelves CJ (2001) The oral fluorinated pyrimidines. Investig New Drugs 19:41–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson PM, Danenberg PV, Johnston PG et al (2014) Standing the test of time: targeting thymidylate biosynthesis in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11:282–298. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Twelves C, Wong A, Nowacki MP et al (2005) Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer. N Engl J Med 352:2696–2704. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scheithauer W, McKendrick J, Begbie S et al (2003) Oral capecitabine as an alternative to iv 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: safety results of a randomized, phase III trial. Ann Oncol 14:1735–1743. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdg500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mikhail SE, Sun JF, Marshall JL (2010) Safety of capecitabine: a review. Expert Opin Drug Saf 9:831–841. doi:10.1517/14740338.2010.511610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meta-analysis Group In Cancer (1998) Efficacy of intravenous continuous infusion of fluorouracil compared with bolus administration in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:301–308

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meulenaar J, Beijnen JH, Schellens JHM, Nuijen B (2013) Slow dissolution behaviour of amorphous capecitabine. Int J Pharm 441:213–217. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.11.041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meulenaar J, Keizer RJ, Beijnen JH et al (2013) Development of an extended-release formulation of capecitabine making use of in vitro-in vivo correlation modelling. J Pharm Sci. doi:10.1002/jps.23779

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marchetti S, Schellens JHM (2007) The impact of FDA and EMEA guidelines on drug development in relation to phase 0 trials. Br J Cancer 97:577–581. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Deenen MJ, Rosing H, Hillebrand MJ et al (2013) Quantitative determination of capecitabine and its six metabolites in human plasma using liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 913–914:30–40. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.11.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  17. Agnihotri SA, Aminabhavi TM (2006) Novel interpenetrating network chitosan-poly(ethylene oxide-g-acrylamide) hydrogel microspheres for the controlled release of capecitabine. Int J Pharm 324:103–115. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.05.061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh Y, Singh M, Meher JG et al (2014) Trichotomous gastric retention of amorphous capecitabine: an attempt to overcome pharmacokinetic gap. Int J Pharm 478:811–821. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.11.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all patients who participated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bart A.W. Jacobs.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 76 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacobs, B.A., Meulenaar, J., Rosing, H. et al. A phase 0 clinical trial of novel candidate extended-release formulations of capecitabine. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 77, 1201–1207 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3035-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3035-5

Keywords

Navigation