Skip to main content
Log in

A new anatomic trait for identifying the mendosal suture in young children: the mendosal–lambdoidal angle

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 19 December 2015

Abstract

Purpose

Radiologic diagnosis of skull fractures in young children is difficult due to numerous accessory sutures. This is especially true around the occipital bone because it has more than one ossification center. Normal anatomic variants, such as the mendosal suture, may be misinterpreted as a skull fracture. We investigated the anatomic traits of the mendosal suture in young children.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 52 children, aged between 1 month and 4 years, who had undergone head computed tomography with three-dimensional reconstructions. We evaluated the presence or absence of the mendosal suture. If present, then we measured the length of the suture and the angle between the lambdoidal and mendosal suture lines.

Results

The presence of the mendosal suture was bilateral in 12 children and unilateral in 5 children. The mendosal suture had a mean length of 13.9 ± 3.4 mm on the right side and 11.2 ± 4 mm on the left side. The angle between the mendosal and lambdoidal sutures had a mean value of 54.2° ± 11° for the right side and 53.6° ± 13.9° for the left side. The 95 % confidence interval for the mean value of the angle had a lower and upper bounds of 48° and 60° on the right side and 46° and 61° on the left side, respectively.

Conclusions

The angle between mendosal and lambdoidal suture lines may help radiologists to identify the mendosal suture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen WE 3rd, Kier EL, Rothman SL (1973) Pitfalls in the evaluation of skull trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 11:479–503

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anton SC (1997) Developmental age and taxonomic affinity of the Mojokerto child, Java, Indonesia. Am J Phys Antropol 102:497–514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borg J, Holm L, Cassidy JD, Peloso PM, Carroll LJ, von Holst H, Ericson K (2004) Diagnostic procedures in mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO collaborating center task force on mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med 43(Suppl):61–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chasler CN (1967) The newborn skull. The diagnosis of fracture. Am J Roentgenol Radium Nucl Med 100:92–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Choudhary AK, Jha B, Boal DK, Dias M (2010) Occipital sutures and its variations: the value of 3D-CT and how to differentiate it from fractures using 3D-CT? Surg Rad Anat 32:807–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ditty BJ, Shoja MM, Tubbs RS, Loukas M (2012) The mendosal suture. Clin Anat 25:521–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Franken EA (1969) The midline occipital fissure. Diagnosis of fracture versus anatomic variants. Radiology 93:1043–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gayretli O, Gurses IA, Kale A, Aksu F, Ozturk A, Bayraktar B, Sahinoglu K (2011) The mendosal suture. Br J Neorusurg 25:730–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gooding CA (1971) Cranial sutures and fontanelles. In: Newton TH, Potts DG (eds) Radiology of the skull and brain, vol I/Book 1. The C. V. Mosby Company, St Louis, pp 216–237

  10. Hanihara T, Ishida H (2001) Frequency of discrete cranial traits in major human populations. II. Hypostotic variations. J Anat 198:707–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lloyd DA, Carty H, Patterson M, Butcher CK, Roe D (1997) Predictive value of skull radiography for intracranial injury in children with blunt head injury. Lancet 349:821–824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lochmuller CM, Marks MK, Mileusnic-Polchan D, Cogswell SC (2011) Misidentification of a transverse occipital suture as a persistent mendosal suture. J Pediatr 159:876–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Madeline LE, Elster AD (1995) Suture closure in human chondrocranium: CT assessment. Radiology 196:747–756

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mann KS, Chan KH, Yue CP (1986) Skull fractures in children: their assessment in relation to developmental skull changes and acute intracranial hematomas. Child’s Nerv Syst 5:258–261

    Google Scholar 

  15. Matsumura G, Uchiumi T, Kida K, Ichikawa R, Kodama G (1993) Developmental studies on the interparietal part of the human occipital squama. J Anat 182:197–204

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller AJ, Kim U, Carrasco E (2010) Differentiating a mendosal suture from a skull fracture. J Pediatr 157:691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mulliken JB, Le MN (2008) A craniofacial glossary. J Craniofac Surg 19:705–712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mulroy MH, Loyd AM, Frush DP, Verla TG, Myers BS, Bass CR (2012) Evaluation of pediatric skull fracture imaging techniques. Forensic Sci Int 214:167–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakahara K, Miyasaka Y, Takagi H, Kan S, Fujii K (2003) Unusual accessory cranial sutures in pediatric head trauma. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 43:80–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakahara K, Utsuki S, Shimizu S, Iida H, Miyasaka Y, Takagi H, Oka H, Fujii K (2006) Age dependence of fusion of primary occipital sutures: a radiographic study. Child’s Nerv Syst 22:1457–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nayak SR, Krishnamurthy A, Madhan Kumar SJ, Prabhu LV, Jiji PJ, Pai MM, Kumar A, Avadhani R (2007) The mendosal suture of the occipital bone: occurrence in Indian population, embryology and clinical significance. Surg Rad Anat 29:329–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pinto PS, Poretti A, Meoded A, Tekes A, Huisman TAGM (2012) The unique features of traumatic brain injury in children. Review of the characteristics of the pediatric skull and brain, mechanisms of trauma, patterns of injury, complications and their imaging findings-Part 1. J Neuroimaging 22:e1–e17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Oakes WJ (2007) Does the mendosal suture exist in the adult? Clin Anat 20:124–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shapiro R, Robinson F (1976) Embryogenesis of the human occipital bone. Am J Roentgenol 126:1063–1068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Srivastava HC (1992) Ossification of the membranous portion of the squamous part of the occipital bone in man. J Anat 180:219–224

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Webber RL, Folio J (1976) Radiographic detectability of occipital and temporal-parietal fractures induced in cadaver heads. J Trauma 16:115–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to express our gratitude to Emrah Can M.D. for his valuable contribution and guidance with the statistical analysis and David F. Chapman BSc. for editing the English of the final version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilke Ali Gurses.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gurses, I.A., Esenkaya, A., Gayretli, O. et al. A new anatomic trait for identifying the mendosal suture in young children: the mendosal–lambdoidal angle. Surg Radiol Anat 38, 321–325 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1556-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1556-y

Keywords

Navigation