Skip to main content
Log in

A new three-dimensional measurement in evaluating the cranial asymmetry caused by craniosynostosis

  • Anatomic Bases of Medical, Radiological and Surgical Techniques
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To present a modified cranial vault asymmetry index, evaluate it by measuring the asymmetry of the skull shape with craniosynostosis and by assessing the surgical outcome quantitatively, compare it with traditional cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI) and discuss its advantages and shortcomings.

Methods

Based on the traditional CVAI, anterior cranial vault asymmetry index (ACVAI) and posterior cranial vault asymmetry index (PCVAI) were proposed to evaluate surgical outcomes. We measured CVAI, ACVAI and PCVAI on the reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images to analyze the degree of the malformation and assess the surgical outcomes. The new method was compared with the traditional one, and statistical analysis was performed.

Results

Using Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, preoperative ACVAI compared to postoperative one is statistically significant (p = 0.018), whereas, the p value for CVAI is 0.128 > 0.05.

Conclusions

The ACVAI and PCVAI as modified can better describe the degree of cranial vault asymmetry compared with CVAI. It is also a more reliable index to assess the surgical outcomes quantitatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal D, Steinbok P, Cochrane DD (2006) Diagnosis of isolated sagittal synostosis: are radiographic studies necessary? Childs Nerv Syst 22:375–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyle CM, Rosenblum JD (1997) Three-dimensional CT for pre- and postsurgical imaging of patients with craniosynostosis: correlation of operative procedure and radiologic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1173–1177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Branson HM, Shroff MM (2011) Craniosynostosis and 3-dimensional computed tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 32:569–577. doi:10.1053/j.sult.2011.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. da Silva Freitas R, de Freitas Azzolini T, Shin JH, Persing JA (2010) Associated (parallel) tomographic findings in patients with single-sutural synostosis. J Craniofac Surg 21:411–413. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cfa7ad

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fearon JA, Singh DJ, Beals SP, Yu JC (2007) The diagnosis and treatment of single-sutural synostoses: are computed tomographic scans necessary? Plast Reconstr Surg 120:1327–1331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Garza RM, Khosla RK (2012) Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Semin Plast Surg 26:53–63. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1320063

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall P, Adami HO, Trichopoulos D, Pedersen NL, Lagiou P, Ekbom A, Ingvar M, Lundell M, Granath F (2004) Effect of low doses of ionising radiation in infancy on cognitive function in adulthood: Swedish population based cohort study. BMJ 328(7430):19

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kabbani H, Raghuveer TS (2004) Craniosynostosis. Am Fam Physician 69:2863–2870

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Loveday BP, de Chalain TB (2001) Active counter positioning or orthotic device to treat positional plagiocephaly? J Craniofac Surg 12:308–313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Posnick JC, Bite U, Nakano P, Davis J, Armstrong D (1992) Indirect intracranial volume measurements using CT scans: clinical applications for craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:34–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Seibert JA (2004) Tradeoffs between image quality and dose. Pediatr Radiol 34(Suppl 3):S183–S195 (discussion S234–41)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No author has any financial support and potential conflicts of interest for this work. The work described has not been submitted elsewhere for publication, in whole or in part, and all the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

Ethical standards

The experiments comply with the current laws of China in which they were performed. The data collection for this paper was approved and carried out under the recommendations of the PUMC Plastic Surgery Hospital IRB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, H., Dong, X. & Yang, B. A new three-dimensional measurement in evaluating the cranial asymmetry caused by craniosynostosis. Surg Radiol Anat 37, 989–995 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1430-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1430-y

Keywords

Navigation