Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surveillance After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

  • Review
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surveillance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is widely considered mandatory. The purpose of surveillance is to detect asymptomatic complications, so that early secondary intervention can prevent late aneurysm rupture. CT angiography has been taken as the reference standard imaging test, but there is increasing interest in using other modalities to reduce the use of ionising radiation and iodinated contrast. As a result, there is wide heterogeneity in surveillance strategies used among EVAR centres. We reviewed the current evidence available on the outcomes of different imaging modalities and surveillance strategies following EVAR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leurs LJ, Buth J, Laheiji RJ, for the EUROSTAR Collaborators (2007) Long-term results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment with the first generation of commercially available stent grafts. Arch Surg 143:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blakensteijn JD, De Jong SE, Prinssen M, van der Ham AC, Buth J, van Sterkenburg SM, Verhagen JH, Buskens E, Grobbee DE, Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) Trial Group (2005) Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 352:2398–2405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. EVAR trial participants (2005) Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:2179–2186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. EVAR trial participants (2005) Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:2187–2192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Padberg FT Jr, Matsumura JS, Kohler TR, Lin PH, Jean-Claude JM, Cikrit DF, Swanson KM, Peduzzi PN, Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group (2009) Outcomes following endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA 302:1535–1542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. The United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators (2010) Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 362:1863–1871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Bruin JL, Baas AF, Buth J, Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Cuypers PW, van Sambeek MR, Balm R, Grobbee DE, Blankensteijn JD, DREAM Study Group (2010) Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 362:1881–1889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Matsumura JS, Padberg FT Jr, Kohler TR, Kougias P, Jean-Claude JM, Cikrit DF, Swanson KM, OVER Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group (2012) Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 367:1988–1997

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Karthikesalingam A, Page AA, Pettengell C, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM, Holt PJ (2011) Heterogeneity in surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair in the UK. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 42:585–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Black SA, Carrell TW, Bell RE, Waltham M, Reidy J, Taylor PR (2009) Long-term surveillance with computed tomography after endovascular aneurysm repair may not be justified. Br J Surg 96:1280–1283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dias NV, Riva L, Ivancev K, Resch T, Sonesson B, Malina M (2009) Is there a benefit of frequent CT follow-up after EVAR? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37:425–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Karthikesalingam A, Holt PJ, Hinchliffe RJ, Nordon IM, Loftus IM, Thompson MM (2010) Risk of re-intervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 97:657–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma P, Kyriakides C (2007) Surveillance of patients post-endovascular aneurysm repair. Postgrad Med J 83:750–753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Moll FL, Powell JT, Fraedrich G, Verzini F, Jaulon S, Waltham M, van Herwaarden JA, Holt PJ, van Keulen JW, Rantner B, Schlösser FJ, Setacci F, Ricco JB, European Society for Vascular Surgery (2011) Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 41(Suppl 1):S1–S58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Patel A, Edwards R, Chandramohan S (2013) Surveillance of patients post-endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). A web-based survey of practice in the UK. Clin Radiol 68:580–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Uthoff H, Pena C, Katzen BT, Gandhi R, West J, Benenati JF, Geisbusch P (2012) Current clinical practice in postoperative endovascular aneurysm repair imaging surveillance. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:1152–1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Iezzi R, Cotroneo AR, Filippone A, Santoro M, Basilico R, Storto ML (2008) Multidetector-row computed tomography angiography in abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular repair: evaluation of optimal timing of delayed phase imaging for the detection of low-flow endoleaks. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:609–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rozenblit A, Patlas M, Rosenbaum AT, Okhi T, Veith FJ, Laks MP, Ricci ZJ (2003) Detection of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of unenhanced and delayed helical CT acquisitions. Radiology 227:426–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Golzarian J, Dussaussois L, Abada HT, Gevenois PA, Van Gansbeke D, Ferreira J, Struyven J (1998) Helical CT of aorta after endoluminal stent-graft therapy: value of biphasic acquisition. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:329–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Motaganahalli R, Martin A, Feliciano B, Murphy MP, Slaven J, Dalsing MC (2012) Estimating the risk of solid organ malignancy in patients undergoing routine computed tomography scans after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 56:929–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, Prevedello LM, Nawfel RD, Hanson R, Khorasani R (2009) Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 251:175–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. White HA, Macdonald S (2010) Estimating risk associated with radiation exposure during follow-up after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 51:95–104

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Noll RE Jr, Tonnessen BH, Mannava K, Money SR, Sterbergh WC 3rd (2007) Long-term postreplacement costs after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 46:9–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Iezzi R, Cotroneo AR, Filippone A, Di Fabio F, Quinto F, Colosimo C, Bonomo L (2006) Multidetector CT in abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular repair: are unenhanced and delayed phase enhanced images effective for endoleak detection? Radiology 241:915–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Macari M, Chandarana H, Schmidt B, Lee J, Lamparello P, Babb J (2006) Abdominal aortic aneurysm: can the arterial phase at CT evaluation after endovascular repair be eliminated to reduce radiation dose? Radiology 241:908–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bastos RM, Razuk Filho A, Blasbalg R, Caffaro RA, Karakhanian WK, Rocha AJ (2011) A multidetector tomography protocol for follow-up of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Clinics 66:2025–2029

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hong C, Heiken JP, Sicard GA, Pilgram TK, Bae KT (2008) Clinical significance of endoleak detected on follow-up CT after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:808–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bley TA, Chase PJ, Reeder SB, Francois CJ, Shinki K, Tefera G, Ranallo FN, Grist TM, Pozniak M (2009) Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: nonenhanced volumetric CT for follow-up. Radiology 253:253–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kranokpiraksa P, Kaufman J (2008) Follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair: plain radiography, ultrasound, CT/CT angiography, MR imaging/MR angiography, or what? J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:S27–S36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Habets J, Zandvoort HJ, Reitsma JB, Bartels LW, Moll FL, Leiner T, van Herwaarden JA (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive than computed tomography angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.12.014

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lookstein R, Goldman J, Pukin L, Marin ML (2004) Time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography as a noninvasive method to characterize endoleaks: initial results compared with conventional angiography. J Vasc Surg 39:27–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stavropoulos SW, Charagundia SR (2007) Imaging techniques for detection and management of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Radiology 243:641–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Almen T, Bellin MF, Bertolotto M, Bongartz G, Clement O, Leander P, Heinz-Peer G, Reimer P, Stacul F, van der Molen A, Webb JA, ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee (2013) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and gadolinium-based contrast media: updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol 23:307–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ayuso JR, de Caralt TM, Pages M, Riambau V, Ayuso C, Sanchez M, Real MI, Montana X (2004) MRA is useful as a follow-up technique after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm with nitinol endo-prosthesis. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:803–810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. van der Laan MJ, Bartels LW, Viergever MA, Blankensteijn JD (2006) Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging of endoleaks after EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32:361–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cantisani V, Ricci P, Grazhdani H, Napoli A, Fanelli F, Catalano C, Galati G, D’Andrea V, Biancari F, Passariello R (2011) Prospective comparative analysis of colour-doppler ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance in detecting endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 41:186–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pitton MB, Schweitzer H, Herber S, Schmiedt W, Neufang A, Kalden P, Thelen M, Duber C (2005) MRI versus helical CT for endoleaks detection after endovascular aneurysm repair. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1275–1281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Alerci M, Oberson M, Fogliata A, Gallino A, Vock P, Wyttenbach R (2009) Prospective, intraindividual comparison of MRI versus MDCT for endoleak detection after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur Radiol 19:1223–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wieners G, Meyer F, Halloul Z, Peters N, Ruhl R, Dudeck O, Tautenhahn J, Ricke J, Pech M (2010) Detection of type II endoleak after endovascular aortic repair: comparison between magnetic resonance angiography and blood-pool contrast agent and dual-phase computed tomography angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:1135–1142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cornelissen S, Prokop M, Verhagen HJ, Adriaensen ME, Moll FL, Bartels LW (2010) Detection of occult endoleaks after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm using magnetic resonance imaging with a blood pool contrast agent. Invest Radiol 45:548–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Haulon S, Lions C, McFadden E, Koussa M, Gaxotte V, Halna P, Beregi JP (2001) Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging after endovascular treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 22:62–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cejna M, Loewe C, Schoder M, Dirisamer A, Holzenbein T, Kretschmer G, Lammer J, Thurnher S (2002) MR angiography vs CT angiography in the follow-up of nitinol stent grafts in endoluminally treated aortic aneurysms. Eur Radiol 12:2443–2450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Inkso EK, Kulzer LM, Fairman RM, Carpenter JP, Stavropoulos SW (2003) MR imaging for the detection of endoleaks in recipients of abdominal aortic stent-grafts with low magnetic susceptibility. Acad Radiol 10:509–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ersoy H, Jacobs P, Kent CK, Prince MR (2004) Blood pool MR angiography of aortic stent-graft endoleak. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1181–1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Millen A, Canavati R, Harrison G, McWilliams RG, Wallace S, Vallabhaneni SR, Fisher RK (2013) Defining a role for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance. J Vasc Surg 58:18–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Karthikesalingam A, Al-Jundi W, Jackson D, Boyle JR, Beard JD, Holt PJ, Thompson MM (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of duplex ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography or computed tomography for surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 99:1514–1523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gray C, Goodman P, Herron CC, Lawler LP, O’Malley MK, O’Donohoe MK, McDonnell CO (2012) Use of colour duplex ultrasound as a first line surveillance tool following EVAR is associated with a reduction in cost without compromising accuracy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 44:145–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Beeman BR, Doctor LM, Doerr K, McAfee-Bennett S, Dougherty MJ, Calligaro KD (2009) Duplex ultrasound imaging alone is sufficient for midterm endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance: a cost analysis study and prospective comparison with computed tomography scan. J Vasc Surg 50:1019–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bakken AM, Illig KA (2010) Long-term follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair: is ultrasound alone enough? Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 22:145–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bargellini I, Cioni R, Napoli V, Petruzzi P, Vignali C, Cicorelli A, Sardella S, Ferrari M, Bartolozzi C (2009) Ultrasonographic surveillance with selective CTA after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther 16:93–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Shah A, Stavropoulos SW (2009) Imaging surveillance following endovascular aneurysm repair. Semin Intervent Radiol 26(1):10–16

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Murphy M, Hodgson R, Harris PL, McWilliams RG, Hartley DE, Lawrence-Brown MM (2003) Plain radiographic surveillance of abdominal aortic stent-grafts: the Liverpool/Perth protocol. J Endovasc Ther 10:911–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hodgson R, McWilliams R, Simpson A, Gould DA, Brennan JA, Gilling-Smith GL, Harris PL (2003) Migration versus apparent migration: importance of errors due to positioning variation in plain radiographic follow-up of aortic stent-grafts. J Endovasc Ther 10:902–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Harrison GJ, Oshin OA, Vallabhaneni SR, Brennan JA, Fisher RK, McWilliams RG (2011) Surveillance after EVAR based on duplex ultrasound and abdominal radiography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 42:187–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Springer F, Gunther RW, Schmitz-Rode T (2008) Aneurysm sac pressure measurement with minimally invasive implantable pressure sensors: an alternative to current surveillance regimes after EVAR? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31:460–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Dias NV, Ivancev K, Malina M, Resch T, Lindblad B, Sonesson B (2004) Intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair: differences between shrinking, unchanged, and expanding aneurysms with and without endoleaks. J Vasc Surg 39:1229–1235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ohki T, Ouriel K, Silveira PG, Katzen B, White R, Criado F, Diethrich E (2007) Initial results of wireless pressure sensing for endovascular aneurysm repair: the APEX trial: acute pressure measurement to confirm aneurysm sac exclusion. J Vasc Surg 45:236–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Ellozy SH, Carroccio A, Lookstein RA, Jacobs TS, Addis MD, Teodorescu VJ, Marin ML (2006) Abdominal aortic aneurysm sac shrinkage after endovascular aneurysm repair: correlation with chronic sac pressure measurement. J Vasc Surg 43:2–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Collins JT, Boros MJ, Combs K (2007) Ultrasound surveillance of endovascular aneurysm repair: a safe modality versus computed tomography. Ann Vasc Surg 21:671–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Chaer RA, Gushchin A, Rhee R, Marone L, Cho JS, Leers S, Makaroun MS (2009) Duplex ultrasound as the sole long-term surveillance method post-endovascular aneurysm repair: a safe alternative for stable aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 49:845–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Schlösser FJV, Gusberg RJ, Dardik A, Lin PH, Verhagen HJ, Moll FL, Muhs BE (2009) Aneurysm rupture after EVAR: can the ultimate failure be predicted? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37:15–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Nordon IM, Karthikesalingam A, Hinchliffe RJ, Holt PJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM (2010) Secondary interventions following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and the enduring value of graft surveillance. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39:547–554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Waasdorp E, van Herwaaden JA, van de Mortel RH, Moll FL, de Vries JP (2008) Early computed tomographic angiography after endovascular aneurysm repair: worthwhile or worthless? Vascular 16:253–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Go MR, Barbato JE, Rhee RY, Makaroun MS (2008) What is the clinical utility of a 6-month computed tomography in the follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair patients? J Vasc Surg 47:1181–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Sternbergh WC 3rd, Greenberg RK, Chuter TA, Tonnessen BH, Zenith Investigators (2008) Redefining postoperative surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair: recommendations based on 5-year follow-up in the US Zenith multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg 48:278–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Stokmans RA, Teijink JA, Forbes TL, Böckler D, Peeters PJ, Riambau V, Hayes PD, van Sambeek MR (2012) Early results from the ENGAGE registry: real-world performance of the Endurant stent graft for endovascular AAA repair in 1262 patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 44:369–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Sternbergh WC 3rd, Carter G, York JW, Yoselevitz M, Money SR (2002) Aortic neck angulation predicts adverse outcomes with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 35:482–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Dillavou ED, Muluk SC, Rhee RY, Tzeng E, Woody JD, Gupta N, Makaroun MS (2003) Does hostile neck anatomy preclude successful endovascular aortic aneurysm repair? J Vasc Surg 38:657–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Hobo R, Kievit J, Leurs LJ, Buth J, EUROSTAR Collaborators (2007) Influence of severe infrarenal aortic neck angulation on complications at the proximal neck following endovascular AAA repair: a Eurostar study. J Endovasc Ther 14:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. AbuRahma AF, Campbell J, Stone PA, Nanjundappa A, Jain A, Dean LS, Habib J, Keiffer T, Emmett M (2009) The correlation of aortic neck length to early and late outcomes in endovascular aneurysm repair patients. J Vasc Surg 50:738–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Antoniou GA, Geogiadis GS, Antoniou SA, Kuhan G, Murray D (2013) A meta-analysis of outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile and friendly neck anatomy. J Vasc Surg 57:527–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Torsello G, Troisi N, Donas KP, Austermann M (2011) Evaluation of the Endurant stent graft under instructions for use vs off-label conditions for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 54:300–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Bastos Goncalves F, van de Luijtgaarden KM, Hoeks SE, Hendriks JM, ten Raa S, Rouwet EV, Stolker RJ, Verhagen HJ (2013) Adequate seal and no endoleak on the first postoperative computed tomography angiography as criteria for no additional imaging up to 5 years after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 57:1503–1511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Patel MS, Carpenter JP (2010) The value of the initial post-EVAR computed tomography angiography scan in predicting future secondary procedures using the Powerlink stent graft. J Vasc Surg 52:1135–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Donald M.L. Tse, Charles R. Tapping, Rafiuddin Patel, Robert Morgan, Mark J. Bratby, Susan Anthony, Raman Uberoi have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK

    Donald M. L. Tse, Charles R. Tapping, Rafiuddin Patel, Mark J. Bratby, Susan Anthony & Raman Uberoi

  2. Department of Radiology, St George’s Hospital, Blackshaw Road, London, SW17 0QT, UK

    Robert Morgan

Authors
  1. Donald M. L. Tse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Charles R. Tapping
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rafiuddin Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert Morgan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mark J. Bratby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Susan Anthony
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Raman Uberoi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raman Uberoi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tse, D.M.L., Tapping, C.R., Patel, R. et al. Surveillance After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37, 875–888 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-0916-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-0916-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation