Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Type of Mesh Fixation in Endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair (TEP) on Long-term Quality of Life

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal mesh repair (TEP) of inguinal hernia has become well accepted with low recurrence and high patient satisfaction rates. However, inguinal pain has also been reported. Source of this pain has been suggested to be the fixation method, especially the use of tacks. Introduction of fibrin glue and absorbable tacks were suggested to lower chronic pain and inguinal discomfort rates. This study analyses the different methods of fixation.

Patients and Methods

201 patients were analysed. Primary end-points were patients’ satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and specific inguinal conditions (e.g. pulling, swelling, troubles at coughing). Secondary endpoints were duration of operation, length of hospital stay, and material costs.

Results

Fibrin glue was used in 101 patients and tacks in 100 patients, in 21 of those absorbable tacks. Patients were fully satisfied with the results in more than 90%, irrespective of the fixation method. Health-related quality of life along the SF-12® questionnaire attested no differences. Inguinal pulling occurred significantly more often after fibrin glue (25.7 %) than after tack fixation (11 %; p = 0.026), whereas no differences in the other specific inguinal sensations occurred.

Conclusion

Mesh fixation in TEP can be performed either by tacks or by fibrin glue with similar long-term results concerning satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and pain. No advantage of fibrin glue could be found, in fact, a higher percentage of patients had inguinal pulling and burning sensations after the use of fibrin glue. The use of absorbable tacks showed no advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Butters M, Redecke J, Köninger J (2007) Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs. Br J Surg 94:562–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 253:322–332

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grant AM, Scott NW, O’Dwyer PJ; on behalf of the MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2009) Five-year follow-up of a randomized trial to assess pain and numbness after laparoscopic or open repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 91:1570–1574

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kuhry E, van Veen RN, Langeveld HR et al (2007) Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review. Surg Endosc 21:161–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Codacci Pisanelli M et al (2008) Comparing fibrin sealant with staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal hernia repair: a case control-study. Surg Endosc 22:668–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar S, Wilson RG, Nixon SJ et al (2002) Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1476–1479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B et al (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90:1479–1492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 19:188–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Felix E, Scott S, Crafton B et al (1998) Causes of recurrence after laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 12:226–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Beldi G, Haupt N, Ipaktchi R et al (2008) Postoperative hypoesthesia and pain: qualitative assessment after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 22:129–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stark E, Oestreich K, Wendl K et al (1999) Nerve irritation after laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 13:878–881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lau H (2005) Fibrin sealant versus mechanical stapling for mesh fixation during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Ann Surg 242:670–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Friedlander MH et al (2001) Use of fibrin sealant for prosthetic mesh fixation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 233:13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenberger RJ, Loeweneck H, Meyer G (2000) The cutaneous nerves encountered during laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 14:731–735

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Topart P, Vandenbroucke F, Lozaćh P (2005) Tisseel vs tack staples as mesh fixation in totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of groin hernias. Surg Endosc 19:724–727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwab R, Willms A, Kröger A et al (2006) Less chronic pain following mesh fixation using a fibrin sealant in TEP inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 10:72–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bosch K (2007) Basiswissen statistik, chapter 7, 1st edn. Oldenbourg Wissenschaft, München, ISBN 978-3-486-58253-6

  18. Fisz M, Sulanke H, Sulanke R (1971) Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und mathematische statistik. Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  19. Morfeld M, Kirchberger I, Bullinger M (2011) SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand, Deutsche Version, 2nd edn. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  20. Boldo E (2008) Pain after laparascopic bilateral hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 22:1206–1209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK et al (2003) Prevalence and severity of chronic groin pain after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 17:1620–1623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H (1999) Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 86:1528–1531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Heikkinen T, Bringman S, Ohtonen P et al (2004) Five-year outcome of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties. Surg Endosc 18:518–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Aasvang E, Kehlet H (2005) Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Anaesth 95:69–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lovisetto F, Zonta S, Rota E et al (2007) Use of human fibrin glue (tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty. Ann Surg 245:222–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor CJ, Wilson T (2005) Long-term results of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy. ANZ J Surg 75:637–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spotnitz WD, Falstrom JK, Rodeheaver GT (1997) The role of sutures and fibrin sealant in wound healing. Surg Clin North Am 77:651–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Phillips EH, Rosenthal R, Fallas M et al (1995) Reasons for early recurrence following laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 9:140–144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liem MS, van Duyn EB, van der Graaf Y; on behalf of the Coala Trial Group (2003) Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 237:136–141

    Google Scholar 

  30. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith W et al (2003) A review of chronic pain inguinal herniorrhapy. Clin J Pain 19:48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the use of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair (2004; review 2007) Technology appraisal guidance no. 83. London: NICE

  32. Teng YJ, Pan SM, Liu YL et al (2011) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of fixation versus nonfixation of mesh in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 25:2849–2858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Garg P, Rajagopal M, Varghese V et al (2009) Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with nonfixation of the mesh for 1.692 hernias. Surg Endosc 23:1241–1245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T et al (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25:2773–2843

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Miserez M, Alexandre JH, Campanelli G et al (2007) The European Hernia Society groin hernia classification: simple and easy to remember. Hernia 11:113–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M et al (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Prof. Dr. C. Weiss from the Department of Biostatistics at the University Hospital Mannheim, Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany for statistical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Zingg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horisberger, K., Jung, M.K., Zingg, U. et al. Influence of Type of Mesh Fixation in Endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair (TEP) on Long-term Quality of Life. World J Surg 37, 1249–1257 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1974-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1974-0

Keywords

Navigation