Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lessons for Surgeons in the Final Moments of Air France Flight 447

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

All surgeons make mistakes, and learning from critical incidents may help improve performance. The present study aimed to highlight lessons for surgeons from analysis of the final moments of Air France Flight 447. All of the authors work in teams and situations where safety, technical performance, and non-technical skills are critical. This review was born out of discussions regarding the events of Flight 447; specifically, whether the airline disaster was relevant to their work, and whether they could learn anything from it.

Methods

The study is based on review of the crash reports of Flight 447, which lost flight speed indication after formation of ice prevented air from entering flight speed indicators during a storm. Following a subsequent stall, the aircraft fell at a rate of >10,000 feet/min until it crashed into the Atlantic Ocean, killing 228 passengers and crew.

Results

There were errors in decision making, reasoning, communication, and teamwork. Such non-technical skills failures have been recognized previously and can be addressed by existing non-technical skills training. A reliance on autopilot meant that the pilots were unfamiliar with high-altitude flying when the autopilot is disengaged. They were unprepared for and affected by such a sudden and serious problem; an event called “surprise and startle” by the accident investigation. The absence of the senior pilot (who was on a scheduled break) in the critical final minutes slowed error recognition and recovery.

Conclusions

Unintended consequences of modern safety strategies may be under-recognized and can lead to adverse events. Both simulation-based and non-simulation–based training should include “surprise and startle” events beyond the scenarios trainees might expect. Likewise, in the face of increasing reliance on modern technology, surgeons should ensure that they would be able to perform procedures in the absence of such technologies. Specific training may improve surgeons’ non-technical skills, and recognition of such skills could also be used to help select future surgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCulloch P, Mishra A, Handa A et al (2009) The effects of aviation-style non-technical skills training on technical performance and outcome in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care 18:109–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hull L, Arora S, Aggarwal R et al (2012) The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg 214:214–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL (2000) Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. Br Med J 320(7237):745–749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leape LL (1994) Error in medicine. JAMA 272:1851–1857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dean B, Schachter M, Vincent C et al (2002) Causes of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a prospective study. Lancet 359(9315):1373–1378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Iedema R, Allen S, Britton K et al (2011) Patients’ and family members’ views on how clinicians enact and how they should enact incident disclosure: the “100 patient stories” qualitative study. Br Med J 343:d4423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bromiley PA (2008) Have you ever made a mistake? RCoA Bull 48:2442–2445

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reason JT, Carthey J, de Leval MR (2001) Diagnosing “vulnerable system syndrome”: an essential prerequisite to effective risk management. Qual Health Care 10(Suppl 2):21–25

    Google Scholar 

  9. Croskerry P (2009) Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process model of reasoning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 14(Suppl 1):27–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reason J (2000) Human error: models and management. Br Med J 320(7237):768–770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses pour la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile. Final report on the accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France, flight AF 447 Rio de Janerio–Paris. http://www.bea.aero/en/enquetes/flight.af.447/rapport.final.en.php. Accessed 22 Feb 2013

  12. Flanagan JC (1954) The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull 51:327–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P et al (2003) Anaesthetists’ Non-Technical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth 90:580–588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Calder LA, Forster AJ, Stiell IG et al (2012) Experiential and rational decision making: a survey to determine how emergency physicians make clinical decisions. Emerg Med J 29:811–816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. West CP, Tan AD, Habermann TM et al (2009) Association of resident fatigue and distress with perceived medical errors. JAMA 302:1294–1300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Peets A, Ayas NT (2012) Restricting resident work hours: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Crit Care Med 40:960–966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Salinas J, Chung KK, Mann EA et al (2011) Computerized decision support system improves fluid resuscitation following severe burns: an original study. Crit Care Med 39:2031–2038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weir-McCall J, Shaw A, Arya A et al (2012) The use of pre-operative computed tomography in the assessment of the acute abdomen. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94:102–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Westbrook JI, Reckmann M, Li L et al (2012) Effects of two commercial electronic prescribing systems on prescribing error rates in hospital in-patients: a before and after study. PLoS Med 9(1):e1001164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Harrison RF, Kennedy RL (2005) Artificial neural network models for prediction of acute coronary syndromes using clinical data from the time of presentation. Ann Emerg Med 46:431–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Molli RG, Anderson KC, Buehler KC et al (2011) Computer-assisted navigation software advancements improve the accuracy of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26:432–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Norman GR, Eva KW (2010) Diagnostic error and clinical reasoning. Med Educ 44:94–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Combs AW, Taylor C (1952) The effect of the perception of mild degrees of threat on performance. J Abnorm Psychol 47(2 Suppl.):420–424

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Witteman C, van den Bercken J, Claes L et al (2009) Assessing rational and intuitive thinking styles. Eur J Psychol Assess 25:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bleetman A, Sanusi S, Dale T et al (2012) Human factors and error prevention in emergency medicine. Emerg Med J 29:389–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kneebone R, Nestel D, Wetzel C et al (2006) The human face of simulation: patient-focused simulation training. Acad Med 81:919–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Steinemann S, Berg B, Ditullio A et al (2012) Assessing teamwork in the trauma bay: introduction of a modified “NOTECHS” scale for trauma. Am J Surg 203:69–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Crochet P, Aggarwal R, Dubb SS et al (2011) Deliberate practice on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator enhances the quality of surgical technical skills. Ann Surg 253:1216–1222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yule S, Flin R, Maran N et al (2008) Surgeons’ non-technical skills in the operating room: reliability testing of the NOTSS behavior rating system. World J Surg 32:548–556. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9320-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sevdalis N, Lyons M, Healey AN et al (2009) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: construct validation with expert versus novice raters. Ann Surg 249:1047–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2012) Aviation safety reporting system. California http://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/. Accessed 3 March 2013

  32. Evans SM, Berry JG, Smith BJ et al (2006) Attitudes and barriers to incident reporting: a collaborative hospital study. Qual Saf Health Care 15:39–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Confidential Reporting System in Surgery (2010) A confidential reporting system for surgery, London. http://www.coress.org.uk/. Accessed 22 Feb 2013

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. General Surgery Registrar, West Midlands Deanery, Birmingham, United Kingdom

    Aneel Bhangu

  2. Anaesthetics and Critical Care Registrar, East Midlands Deanery, Nottingham, United Kingdom

    Sonia Bhangu

  3. Pilot and Airline Pilot Instructor, Flight Training Europe, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain

    James Stevenson

  4. Department of Surgery, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, United Kingdom

    Douglas M. Bowley

Authors
  1. Aneel Bhangu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sonia Bhangu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James Stevenson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Douglas M. Bowley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aneel Bhangu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhangu, A., Bhangu, S., Stevenson, J. et al. Lessons for Surgeons in the Final Moments of Air France Flight 447. World J Surg 37, 1185–1192 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1971-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1971-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation