Abstract
To further the understanding of climate change adaptation processes, more attention needs to be paid to the various contextual factors that shape whether and how climate-related knowledge and information is received and acted upon by actors involved. This study sets out to examine the characteristics of forest owners’ in Sweden, the information and knowledge-sharing networks they draw upon for decision-making, and their perceptions of climate risks, their forests’ resilience, the need for adaptation, and perceived adaptive capacity. By applying the concept of ego-network analysis, the empirical data was generated by a quantitative survey distributed to 3000 private forest owners’ in Sweden in 2014 with a response rate of 31%. The results show that there is a positive correlation, even though it is generally weak, between forest owner climate perceptions and (i) network features, i.e. network size and heterogeneity, and (ii) presence of certain alter groups (i.e. network members or actors). Results indicate that forest owners’ social networks currently serve only a minimal function of sharing knowledge of climate change and adaptation. Moreover, considering the fairly infrequent contact between respondents and alter groups, the timing of knowledge sharing is important. In conclusion we suggest those actors that forest owners’ most frequently communicate with, especially forestry experts providing advisory services (e.g. forest owner associations, companies, and authorities) have a clear role to communicate both the risks of climate change and opportunities for adaptation. Peers are valuable in connecting information about climate risks and adaptation to the actual forest property.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Change 93:335–354. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
Andersson L, Bohman A, van Well L, Jonsson CA, Persson G, Farelius J (2015) Underlag till kontrollstation 2015 för anpassning till ett förändrat klimat [Data for control station 2015 for adaptation to climate change]. SMHI Klimatologi 2015:12. SMHI, Norrköping. http://www.smhi.se/polopoly_fs/1.86329!/Menu/general/extGroup/attachmentColHold/mainCol1/file/Klimatologi%20Nr%2012.pdf
Andersson M (2012) Assessing non-industrial private forest owners’ attitudes to risk: do owner and property characteristics matter? J For Econ 18:3–13. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2011.05.001
André K (2013) Climate change adaptation processes : regional and sectoral stakeholder perspectives. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science 579. Dissertation. Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
André K, Gerger Swartling Å, Vulturius G, Olsson O, Carlsen H (2016) Climate change adaptation in Swedish forestry: Driving forces, risks and opportunities. Mistra-SWECA Report No 7. Lund University, Lund. http://mistra.org/download/18.5114b7214fae9d7a8a82903/1455268259207/MistraSWECIA+Kortsyntes+Rapport+Nr7_Webb_0%2C6mb.pdf
André K, Jonsson CA (2015) Science–practice interactions linked to climate adaptation in two contexts: municipal planning and forestry in Sweden. J Environ Plan Manag 58:297–314. doi:10.1080/09640568.2013.854717
Baird J, Plummer R, Haug C, Huitema D (2014) Learning effects of interactive decision-making processes for climate change adaptation. Glob Environ Change 27:51–63. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.019
Baumgart-Getz A, Prokopy LS, Floress K (2012) Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: a meta-analysis of the adoption literature. J Environ Manag 96:17–25. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.006
Bennett NJ (2016) Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol 30:582–592. doi:10.1111/cobi.12681
Berkhout F (2012) Adaptation to climate change by organizations. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 3:91–106. doi:10.1002/wcc.154
Bharwani S, Ballard D, Varela-Ortega C, Carmona G, Watkiss P, Downing T, Devisscher T, Taylor R (2012) Visualization of institutional networks and the flows of information used for making adaptation decisions in a range of policy contexts. MEDIATION Delivery Report. http://mediation-project.eu/output/downloads/d1.4-visualization-of-institutional-networks.pdf
Blennow K (2008) Risk management in Swedish forestry—policy formation and fulfilment of goals. J Risk Res 11:237–254. doi:10.1080/13669870801939415
Blennow K, Persson J, Tomé M, Hanewinkel M (2012) Climate change: believing and seeing implies adapting. PLoS One 7(11):e50182. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050182
Bodin Ö, Crona B (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Glob Environ Change 19:366–374. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002
Borgatti SP, Everett M, Johnson JC (2013) Analyzing social networks. SAGE, London
Brossard D, Lewenstein B (2009) A critical appraisal of models of public understanding of science: using practice to inform theory. In: Kahlor L, Stout P (eds) Communicating science: new agendas in communication. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 11–39
Crona B, Bodin Ö (2006) What you know is who you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for co-management. Ecol Soc 11:7, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art7/
Crona B, Bodin Ö (2011) Knowledge, social networks and leadership: setting the stage for the development of adaptive institutions? In: Boyd E, Folke C (eds) Adapting institutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 11–36. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139017237.005
Dow K, Berkhout F, Preston BL, Klein RJT, Midgley G, Shaw MR (2013a) Limits to adaptation. Nat Clim Change 3:305–307. doi:10.1038/nclimate1847
Dow K, Haywood BK, Kettle NP, Lackstrom K (2013b) The role of ad hoc networks in supporting climate change adaptation: a case study from the Southeastern United States. Reg Environ Change 13:1235–1244. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0440-8
Field A (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS: (and sex and drugs and rock “n” roll). SAGE, Los Angeles
Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Paterson J (2011) A systematic review of observed climate change adaptation in developed nations. Clim Change 106:327–336
Gerger Swartling Å, Wallgren O, Klein RJT, Ulmanen J, Dahlin M (2015) Participation and learning for climate change adaptation: a case study of the Swedish Forestry Sector. In: Obrien K, Selboe E (eds) The adaptive challenge of climate change. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 252–270
Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78:1360–1380
Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Change 15:199–213. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002
Grotta AT, Creighton JH, Schnepf C, Kantor S (2013) Family forest owners’ and climate change: understanding, attitudes, and educational needs. J For 111:87–93. doi:10.5849/jof.12-052
Guillén LA, Wallin I, Brukas V (2015) Social capital in small-scale forestry: a local case study in Southern Sweden. For Policy Econ 53:21–28. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2014.12.006
Hannerz M, Boje L, Löf M (2010) The role of internet in knowledge-building among private forest owners’ in Sweden. Ecol Bull 53:225–234
Haythornthwaite C (1996) Social network analysis: an approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Libr Inf Sci Res 18:323–342. doi:10.1016/S0740-8188(96)90003-1
Hujala T, Pykäläinen J, Tikkanen J (2007) Decision-making among Finnish non-industrial private forest owners’: the role of professional opinion and desire to learn. Scand J For Res 22:454–463. doi:10.1080/02827580701395434
Jasny L, Waggle J, Fisher DR (2015) An empirical examination of echo chambers in US climate policy networks. Nat Clim Change 5(8):782–786. doi:10.1038/nclimate2666
IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Isaac ME (2012) Agricultural information exchange and organizational ties: the effect of network topology on managing agrodiversity. Agric Syst 109:9–15. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2012.01.011
Isaac ME, Erickson BH, Quashie-Sam SJ, Timmer VR (2007) Transfer of knowledge on agroforestry management practices: the structure of farmer advice networks. Ecol Soc 12:32, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art32/
Keskitalo ECH (2008) Vulnerability and adaptive capacity in forestry in northern Europe: a Swedish case study. Clim Change 87:219–234. doi:10.1007/s10584-007-9337-1
Keskitalo ECH (2009) Governance in vulnerability assessment: the role of globalising decision-making networks in determining local vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 14:185–201. doi:10.1007/s11027-008-9159-0
Keskitalo ECH (2011) How can forest management adapt to climate change? Possibilities in different forestry systems. Forests 2:415–430. doi:10.3390/f2010415
Keskitalo ECH, Baird J, Ambjörnsson EL, Plummer R (2014) Social network analysis of multi-level linkages: a Swedish case study on northern forest-based sectors. AMBIO 43:745–758. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0492-0
Kittredge DB, Rickenbach MG, Knoot TG, Snellings E, Erazo A (2013) It’s the network: how personal connections shape decisions about private forest Use. North J Appl For 30:67–74. doi:10.5849/njaf.11-004
Knoot TG, Rickenbach M (2011) Best management practices and timber harvesting: the role of social networks in shaping landowner decisions. Scand J For Res 26:171–182. doi:10.1080/02827581.2010.545827
Lindner M, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Kolström M, Green T, Reguera R, Maroschek M, Seidl R, Lexer, M.J, Netherer S, Schopf A, Kremer A, Delzon S, Barbatti A, Marchetti M, Corona P (2008) Impacts of climate change on European forests and options for adaptation. Report to the European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development. Report: AGRI-2007-G4-06
Lindner M, Maroschek M, Netherer S, Kremer A, Barbati A, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Seidl R, Delzon S, Corona P, Kolström M, Lexer MJ, Marchetti M (2010) Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 259:698–709. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023
Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob Environ Change 17:445–459. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004
May B (2015) From informant to actor to leader: social-ecological inventories as a catalyst for leadership development in participatory community climate change adaptation. In: Obrien K, Selboe E (eds) The adaptive challenge of climate change. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 230–251
Moser SC, Dilling L (2007) Toward the social tipping point: creating a climate for change. In: Moser SC, Dilling L (eds) Creating a climate for change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 491–516
Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:22026–22031. doi:10.1073/pnas.1007887107
Murray G, D’Anna L, MacDonald P (2016) Measuring what we value: the utility of mixed methods approaches for incorporating values into marine social-ecological system management. Mar Policy 73:61–68
Naustdalslid J (2011) Climate change—the challenge of translating scientific knowledge into action. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 18:243–252. doi:10.1080/13504509.2011.572303
Newman L, Dale A (2006) Homophily and agency: creating effective sustainable development networks. Environ Dev Sustain 9:79–90. doi:10.1007/s10668-005-9004-5
Nisbet MC, Scheufele DA (2009) What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. Am J Bot 96:1767–1778. doi:10.3732/ajb.0900041
Nordén A, Coria J, Jönsson AM, Lagergren F, Lehsten V (2015) Divergence in stakeholders’ preferences: evidence from a choice experiment on forest landscapes preferences in Sweden. Working Paper in Economics No 616. Department of Economics School of Business, Economics and Law at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/38408
Nordlund A, Westin K (2010) Forest values and forest management attitudes among private forest owners’ in Sweden. Forests 2:30–50. doi:10.3390/f2010030
Pelling M, High C, Dearing J, Smith D (2008) Shadow spaces for social learning: a relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisations. Environ Plan A 40:867–884. doi:10.1068/a39148
Persson E, Norman J, Götz S, Pacheco Faias S, Hanewinkel M, Tomé M, Blennow K (2011) D5.4 A report on stakeholder approaches to and views on ways and options for handling uncertainty and change. MOTIVE. http://www.motive-project.net/files/DOWNLOAD2/MOTIVE_Deliverable%205.4_1.pdf
Prell C, Hubacek K, Reed M (2009) Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 22:501–518. doi:10.1080/08941920802199202
Reed M, Evely AC, Cundill G, Fazey I, Glass J, Laing A, Newig J, Parrish B, Prell C, Raymond C, Stringer LC (2010) What is social learning? Ecol Soc 15:r1, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/resp1/
Rist S, Chidambaranathan M, Escobar C, Wiesman U, Zimmermann A (2007) Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: the role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. J Rural Stud 23:23–37. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.02.006
Schmithüsen F, Hirsh F (2010) Private forest ownership in Europe. United Nations, Geneva. Report: ECE/TIM/SP/26
Schoene DHF, Bernier PY (2012) Adapting forestry and forests to climate change: a challenge to change the paradigm. For Policy Econ 24:12–19
Stiller S, Meijerink S (2015) Leadership within regional climate change adaptation networks: the case of climate adaptation officers in Northern Hesse, Germany. Reg Environ Change 1–13. doi:10.1007/s10113-015-0886-y
Swedish Forest Agency (2014) Swedish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2014. Swedish Forest Agency, Jönköping, http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/Global/myndigheten/Statistik/Skogsstatistisk%20%C3%A5rsbok/01.%20Hela%202014%20-%20Entire%202014/Skogsstatistiska%20%C3%A5rsboken%202014%20(hela).pdf
Turner RA, Fitzsimmons C, Forster J, Mahon R, Peterson A, Stead SM (2014) Measuring good governance for complex ecosystems: perceptions of coral reef-dependent communities in the Caribbean. Glob Environ Change 29:105–117. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.004
Uggla Y, Lidskog R (2016) Climate risks and forest practices: forest owners’ acceptance of advice concerning climate change. Scand J For Res, doi:10.1080/02827581.2015.1134648
Ulmanen J, Gerger Swartling Å, Wallgren O (2015) Climate adaptation in Swedish forestry: exploring the debate and policy process, 1990–2012. Forests 6:708–733. doi:10.3390/f6030708
Vulturius G, Gerger Swartling Å (2015) Overcoming social barriers to learning and engagement with climate change adaptation: experiences with Swedish forestry stakeholders. Scand J For Res 30:217–225. doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.1002218
Vulturius G, Nordén A, Arvidsson A (2015) National survey of forestry professionals in Sweden. Mistra-SWECIA annual report 2014. Mistra-SWECIA, Norrköping. http://mistra.org/download/18.5114b7214fae9d7a8a7258e/1453395332791/Mistra-SWECIA+%C3%A8rsrapport+2014.pdf
Vulturius G, André K, Gerger Swartling Å, Brown C, Rounsevell M, Jönsson A., Blanco V (in review) Explaining engagement with climate change adaptation among forest owners in Sweden. Reg Environ Change (submited)
Weichselgartner J, Kasperson R (2010) Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research. Glob Environ Change 20:266–277. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.006
Weichselgartner J, Marandino CA (2012) Priority knowledge for marine environments: challenges at the science–society nexus. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4:323–330. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.05.001
Whitmarsh L (2008) Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? the role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. J Risk Res 11:351–374. doi:10.1080/13669870701552235
Wibeck V (2014) Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate change—some lessons from recent literature. Environ Educ Res 20(3):387–411. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.812720
Wilby RL, Vaughan K (2011) Hallmarks of organisations that are adapting to climate change. Water Environ J 25:271–281. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2010.00220.x
Williams C, Fenton A, Huq S (2015) Knowledge and adaptive capacity. Nat Clim Change 5:82–83. doi:10.1038/nclimate2476
Wolf J, Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, Abrahamson V, Raine R (2010) Social capital, individual responses to heat waves and climate change adaptation: an empirical study of two UK cities. Glob Environ Change 20:44–52. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.09.004
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank all respondents for their participation. We are also thankful to Olle Olsson (SEI), Anna Maria Jönsson, Fredrik Lagergren and Mats Andersson (Lund University) and Anna Nordén (Gothenburg University) for support and assistance with the survey. We thank the anonymous reviewers, as well as Marion Davis (SEI) for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. We acknowledge the financial support of the Swedish Foundation for Environmental Research (Mistra). This study is part of the Mistra-SWECIA programme on climate, impacts and adaptation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
André, K., Baird, J., Gerger Swartling, Å. et al. Analysis of Swedish Forest Owners’ Information and Knowledge-Sharing Networks for Decision-Making: Insights for Climate Change Communication and Adaptation. Environmental Management 59, 885–897 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0844-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0844-1