Abstract
We consider the extent to which the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act (MVRMA) provides an opportunity for deliberative democracy to emerge within the context of resource management in Canada’s North. The focus is on the extent to which the tenets of deliberative democracy are exercised in the environmental assessment (EA) of the Snap Lake diamonds project. Data collection included semi-structured interviews with assessment participants, and a review of documentation surrounding the EA process, and the case study. Results combined four principles of deliberative democracy: generality, autonomy, power neutrality, and ideal role taking. The EA conducted under the MVRMA can serve as a deliberative process, as illustrated by opportunities for dialogue, access to different perspectives, and learning outcomes. However, many of these positive results occurred through nonmandated technical sessions. The absence of participant funding also limits the deliberative potential of the MVRMA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson J, Forest P-G, Eyles J et al (2003) Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science and Medicine 57:239–251
Armitage DR (2005a) Collaborative environmental assessment in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25:239–258
Armitage DR (2005b) Environmental impact assessment in Canada’s Northwest Territories: integration, collaboration and the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act. In: Hanna K (ed) Environmental Impact Assessment: practice and Participation. Oxford University Press, Toronto, ON, pp 185–211
Baber WF (2004) Ecology and democratic governance: toward a deliberative model of environmental politics. The Social Science Journal 41:331–346
Barabas J (2004) How deliberation affects policy opinions. American Political Science Review 98:687–701
Beierle TC (1999) Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions. Policy Studies Review 16:75–103
Berkes F (1999) Sacred ecology: traditional ecological knowledge. Taylor and Francis Inc, Ann Arbor, MI
Bernard HR (1994) Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approach. Alta Mira Press, Walnut Creek, CA
BHP Environmental Assessment Panel (1996) NWT diamonds project report of the environmental assessment panel. Federal Environmental Assessment and Review Office, Ottawa
Canadian Environmental Network-Environmental Planning and Assessment Caucus (1998) A federal environmental assessment process: the core elements. Canadian Environmental Network-Environmental Planning and Assessment Caucus, Ottawa
Cooke M (2002) Five arguments for deliberative democracy. In: d’Entreve MP (ed) Democracy as public deliberation: new perspectives. UBC Press, Vancouver, BC, pp 53–87
Davies BB, Blackstock K (2005) ‘Recruitment’, ‘composition’, and ‘mandate’ issues in deliberative processes: should we focus on arguments rather than individuals? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23:599–615
Diduck AP (2001) Learning through public involvement in environmental assessment: a transformative perspective. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
Diduck AP (2004) Incorporating participatory approaches and social learning. In: Mitchell B (ed) Resource and environmental management in Canada: addressing conflict and uncertainty. Oxford University Press, Toronto, ON, Canada, pp 497–527
Diduck AP, Mitchell B (2003) Learning, public involvement and environmental assessment: a Canadian case. Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 5:339–364
Diduck AP, Sinclair AJ (1997) The concept of critical environmental assessment education. The Canadian Geographer 41:294–307
Diduck AP, Sinclair AJ (2002) Public involvement in environmental assessment: the case of the nonparticipant. Environmental Management 29:578–588
Dorcey AHJ (2004) Sustainability governance: surfing the waves of transformation. In: Mitchell B (ed) Resource and environmental management in Canada: addressing conflict and uncertainty. Oxford University Press, Toronto, pp 528–554
Dryzek J (1990) Discursive democracy: politics, policy and political science. Cambridge University Press, New York
Dryzek J (2001) Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Political Theory 29:651–699
Duinker P, Bull G, Shindler BA (2003) Sustainable forestry in Canada and the United States: Development and prospects. In: Shindler BA, Beckley TM, Finley MC (eds) Two Paths Toward Sustainable Forests: public Values in Canada and the United States. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, pp 4–17
Ellis SC (2005) Meaningful consideration? A review of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making. Arctic 58:66–77
Enslin P, Pendlebury S, Tjiattas M (2001) Deliberative democracy, diversity and the challenges of citizenship education. Journal of Philosophy Education 35:115–130
Fitzpatrick P (2006) In it together: organizational learning though participation in environmental assessment. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 8:157–183
Fitzpatrick P, Sinclair AJ (2003) Learning through public involvement in environmental assessment hearings. Journal of Environmental Management 67:161–174
Freire P (1973) Pedagogy of the oppressed. The Seabury Press, New York
Gibson RB (1993) Environmental assessment design: lessons from the Canadian experience. The Environmental Professional 15:12–24
Gibson RB (2006) Sustainability assessment and conflict resolution: reaching agreement to proceed with the Voisey’s Bay nickel mine. Journal of Cleaner Production 14:334–348
Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action: reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon Press, Boston, MA
Habermas J (1987) The theory of communicative action: lifeworld and systems. Beacon Press, Boston
Habermas J (1990) Moral conciousness and communicative action. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Hartley N, Wood C (2005) Public participation in environmental impact assessment: implementing the Aarhus Convention. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25:319–340
Huberman AM, Miles MB (1994) Data management and analysis methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) The Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 428–444
Innes JE (1998) Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 64:52–63
Jarvis P (1987) Adult learning in the social context. Croom Helm, London
Kendrick A, Lyver PO, LKeDF nation (2005) Denesoline (Chipewyan) Knowledge of Barren-Ground Caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) Movements. Arctic 58:175–191
Lynn FM (2000) Community-scientist collaboration in environmental research. American Behavioral Scientist 44:648–662
Lynn S, Wathern P (1991) Intervenor funding in environmental assessment processes in Canada. Project Appraisal 6:169–173
Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board (2003) Snap Lake Project. Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board, Yellowknife, NT, CA
Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board (2005a) Guidelines for incorporating traditional knowledge in environmental assessment. Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board, Yellowknife
Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board (2005b) Lessons learned form the MVEIRB’s Snap Lake environmental assessment process. Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board, Yellowknife, NT, CA
Marshall BK, Jones RE (2005) Citizen participation in natural resource management: Does representativeness matter? Sociological Spectrum 25:715–737
McGregor C (2004) Care(full) deliberation: a pedagogy for citizenship. Journal Of Transformative Education 2:90–106
Merriam SB, Caffarella RS (1999) Learning in adulthood: a comprehensive guide. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Mezirow J (1991) Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Mezirow J, Associates (2000) Learning as transformation: critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Mitchell B (2002) Resource and environmental management. Longman, Pearson Education Limited, Essex, England
Morrow RA, Torres CA (2002) Reading Freire and Habermas: critical pedagogy and transformative social change. Teachers College Press, New York
MVEIRB (2001) Environmental impact assessment guidelines. Mackenzie Valley Impact Review Board, Yellowknife, NT, CA
MVEIRB (2003) Report of environmental assessment and reasons for decision on the De Beers Canada Inc. Snap Lake diamond project. Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board, Yellowknife, NT, Canada
MVEIRB (2005) Lessons learned form the MVEIRB’s Snap Lake environmental assessment process. Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board, Yellowknife, NT, CA
MVEIRB. no date. Introduction to the MVRMA. MackenzieValleyEnvironmentalImpactReviewBoard, Yellowknife, NT, CA
Nerysoo R (1999) Address. Canadian Institute of Resources Law, Calgary, AB
Palerm JR (2000) An empirical-theoretical analysis framework for public participation in environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43:581–600
Parkins JR, Mitchell RE (2005) Public participation as public debate: a deliberative turn in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 18:529–540
Parkinson J (2003) Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy. Political Studies 51:180–196
Parson EA (2001) Environmental trends: a challenge to Canadian governance. In: Parson EA (ed) Governing the Environment: Persistent Challenges. Uncertain Innovations. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON, Canada, pp 3–30
Petts J (1999) Public participation and environmental impact assessment. In: Petts J (ed) Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment: environmental Impact Assessment: process, Methods and Practice. Blackwell Science, Oxford, United Kingdom, pp 145–177
Petts J (2003) Barriers to deliberative participation in EIA: learning from waste policies, plans and projects. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 5:269–293
Poncelet EC (2001) Personal transformation in multistakeholder environmental partnerships. Policy Sciences 34:273–301
Pring GR, Noe S (2002) The emerging international law of public participation affecting global mining, energy and resource development. In: Zillman DN, Lucas AR, Pring GR (eds) Human rights in natural resource development: public participation in the sustainable development of mining and energy resources. Oxford University Press, Toronto, ON, pp 11–76
QSR (1999–2002) QSR Nvivo. Qualitative Solution Research Limited, Melbourne
SENES Consultants Limited (2006) NWT Environmental Audit: regulatory regime, CIMP and status of the environment. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Yellowknife, NT
Simpson L (2000) Anishinaabe ways of knowing. In: Oakes J, Riewe R, Koolage S, Simpson L, Schuster N (eds) Aboriginal Health, Identity and Resources. Department of Native Studies and Zoology, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, pp 165–185
Sinclair AJ, Diduck AP (2001) Public involvement in E.A. in Canada: a transformative learning perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 21:113–136
Sinclair AJ, Diduck AP (2005) Public involvement in Canadian environmental assessment: enduring challenges and future directions. In: Hanna K (ed) Environmental Impact Assessment: Process and Practice. Oxford University Press, Toronto, ON, Canada, pp 53–74
Stevenson MG (1996) Indigenous knowledge in environmental assessment. Arctic 49:278–291
Taylor, EW (2000) Analyzing research on transformative learning theory. In: Mezirow JD and Associates (eds) Learning as Transformation: critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 285–328
Usher PJ (2000) Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management. Arctic 53:183–193
Webler T (1995) ‘Right’ discourse in citizen participation: an evaluative yardstick. In: Renn O, Webler T, Wiedemann P (eds) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp 35–86
Webler T, Kastenholz H, Renn O (1995) Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 15:443–463
Welton M (2001) Civil society and the public sphere: Habermas’s recent learning theory. Studies in the Education of Adults 33:20–34
Wiklund H (2005) In search of arenas for democratic deliberation: a Habermasian review of environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 23:281–292
Wood C (1995) Environmental impact assessment: a comparative review. Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, United Kingdom
Zillman DN, Lucas AR, Pring GR (2002) Human rights in natural resource development: public participation in the sustainable development of mining and energy resources. Oxford University Press, Toronto, ON
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank research participants, who volunteered to participate and provided wise insight about the MVRMA and the Snap Lake EA. We would like to acknowledge the two reviewers whose questions and comments greatly strengthened the document. Financial support for this study was provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and the Northern Studies Research Training Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fitzpatrick, P., Sinclair, A.J. & Mitchell, B. Environmental Impact Assessment Under the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act: Deliberative Democracy in Canada’s North?. Environmental Management 42, 1–18 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9098-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9098-2