Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quality and Quantity of Suspended Particles in Rivers: Continent-Scale Patterns in the United States

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Suspended solids or sediments can be pollutants in rivers, but they are also an important component of lotic food webs. Suspended sediment data for rivers were obtained from a United States–wide water quality database for 622 stations. Data for particulate nitrogen, suspended carbon, discharge, watershed area, land use, and population were also used. Stations were classified by United States Environmental Protection Agency ecoregions to assess relationships between terrestrial habitats and the quality and quantity of total suspended solids (TSS). Results indicate that nephelometric determinations of mean turbidity can be used to estimate mean suspended sediment values to within an order of magnitude (r2 = 0.89). Water quality is often considered impaired above 80 mg TSS L−1, and 35% of the stations examined during this study had mean values exceeding this level. Forested systems had substantially lower TSS and somewhat higher carbon-to-nitrogen ratios of suspended materials. The correlation between TSS and discharge was moderately well described by an exponential relationship, with the power of the exponent indicating potential acute sediment events in rivers. Mean sediment values and power of the exponent varied significantly with ecoregion, but TSS values were also influenced by land use practices and geomorphological characteristics. Results confirm that, based on current water quality standards, excessive suspended solids impair numerous rivers in the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 10.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alexander, R. B., Slack, J. R. Ludke, A. S., Fitzgerald, K. F., Schertz. T. L. 1996. Data for selected US Geological Survey National Stream Water-Quality Monitoring Networks (WQN). USGS Digital Data Series DDS-37.

  • R. B. Alexander J. R. Slack A. S. Ludke K. F. Fitzgerald T. L. Schertz (1998) ArticleTitleData from selected U.S. Geological Survey national stream water quality monitoring networks Water Resources Research 9 2401–2405 Occurrence Handle10.1029/98WR01530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM, 1999, D 3977-97, Standard test method for determining sediment concentration in water samples, annual book of standards, water and environmental technology, 1999, Volume 11.02, p 389–394.

  • H. E. Berkman C. F. Rabeni (1987) ArticleTitleEffect of siltation on stream fish communities Environmental Biology of Fishes 18 285–294

    Google Scholar 

  • S. A. Bryce J. M. Omernik D. P. Larsen (1999) ArticleTitleEcoregions: A geographic framework to guide risk characterization and ecosystem management Environmental Practice 1 131–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 1997. Ecological regions of North America: Toward a common perspective. Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Montreal Map (scale 1:12,500,000). Quebec, Canada. 71 pp.

  • C. M. Cooper (1993) ArticleTitleBiological effects of agriculturally derived surface water pollutants on aquatic systems—a review Journal of Environmental Quality 22 402–408 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXjslGitA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • C. M. Cooper (1988) ArticleTitleThe toxicity of suspended sediments on selected freshwater invertebrates Internationalen vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie, Verhandlungen 23 1619–1625

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Culp F. J. Wrona R. W. Davies (1986) ArticleTitleResponse of stream benthos and drift to fine sediment deposition versus transport Canadian Journal of Zoology 64 1345–1351

    Google Scholar 

  • H. G. Earhart (1984) ArticleTitleMonitoring total suspended solids by using nephelometry Environmental Management 8 81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • J. E. Garvey E. A. Marschall R. A. Wright (1998) ArticleTitleFrom star charts to stoneflies: detecting relationships in continuous bivariate data Ecology 79 442–447

    Google Scholar 

  • G. E. Griffith J. M. Omernik A. J. Woods (1999) ArticleTitleEcoregions, watershed, basins, and HUCs: How state and federal agencies frame water quality Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54 666–677

    Google Scholar 

  • R. K. Hubbard J. M. Sheridan L. R. Marti (1990) ArticleTitleDissolved suspended solids transport from coastal plain watersheds Journal of Environmental Quality 19 413–420 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK3cXlt1SnsLw%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D. P. Lettenmaier E. R. Hooper C. Wagoner K. B. Faris (1991) ArticleTitleTrends in stream quality in the continental United States, 1978–1987 Water Resources Research 27 327–339 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXksFKltrs%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Omernik (1987) ArticleTitleEcoregions of the conterminous United States. Map (scale 1:7,500,000) Annals of the Association of American Geography 77 118–125

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Omernik R. G. Bailey (1997) ArticleTitleDistinguishing between watersheds and ecoregions Journal of the American Water Research Association 33 935–949

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Pan R. J. Stevenson B. H. Hill A. T. Herlihy (2000) ArticleTitleEcoregions and benthic diatom assemblages in Mid-Atlantic Highlands streams, USA Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19 518–540

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pozo A. Elosegui A. Basaguren (1993) ArticleTitleSeston transport variability at different spatial and temporal scales in the Aguera watershed (north Spain) Water Research 28 125–136 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0043-1354(94)90126-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. M. Rice J. Lewis (1991) ArticleTitleEstimating erosion risks associated with logging and forest roads in northwestern California Water Research Bulletin 27 809–818

    Google Scholar 

  • R. B. Thomas J. Lewis (1993) ArticleTitleA comparison of selection at list time and time-stratified sampling for estimating suspended sediment loads Water Resources Research 29 1247–1256 Occurrence Handle10.1029/92WR02711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. B. Thomas J. Lewis (1995) ArticleTitleAn evaluation of flow-stratified sampling for estimating suspended sediment loads Journal of Hydrobiology 170 27–45 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-1694(95)02699-P

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Water quality conditions in the United States a profile from the 1998 National Water Quality Inventory Report to Office of Water (4503F) EPA841-F-00-006.

  • J. VanSickle R. L. Beschta (1983) ArticleTitleSupply-based models of suspended sediment transport in streams Water Resources Research 19 768–778

    Google Scholar 

  • J. B. Wallace R. W. Merritt (1980) ArticleTitleFilter-feeding ecology of aquatic insects Annual Review of Entomology 25 103–132 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.en.25.010180.000535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, T. F. 1995. Sediment in streams: sources, biological effects, and control. American Fisheries Society Monograph no. 7. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.

  • M. R. Whiles W. K. Dodds (2002) ArticleTitleRelationships between stream size, suspended particles, and filter-feeding macroinvertebrates in a Great Plains drainage network Journal of Environmental Quality 31 1589–1600 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XnsFemsLg%3D Occurrence Handle12371176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • P. L. Wood P. D. Armitage (1997) ArticleTitleBiological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment Environmental Management 21 203–217 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002679900019 Occurrence Handle9008071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R. S. Wotton (1994) The biology of particles in aquatic systems Lewis Publishers Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Kansas Department of Health and Environment and the Konza NSF LTER for financial support of this project. Dolly Gudder made helpful comments on the manuscript. Jeff Pontius and Mendy Smith assisted with statistical analyses. This is contribution 02-66-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA

    Walter K. Dodds

  2. Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Ilinois, 62901-6501, USA

    Matt R. Whiles

Authors
  1. Walter K. Dodds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matt R. Whiles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter K. Dodds.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dodds, W., Whiles, M. Quality and Quantity of Suspended Particles in Rivers: Continent-Scale Patterns in the United States. Environmental Management 33, 355–367 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0089-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0089-z

Search

Navigation