Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative Study of Nipple–Areola Complex Position and Patient Satisfaction After Unilateral Mastectomy and Immediate Expander–Implant Reconstruction Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Major surgical concerns associated with nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) are partial or total nipple–areola complex (NAC) loss, decreased sensation, and nipple malposition. Patient satisfaction and NAC outcomes including malposition in patients who have undergone unilateral expander–implant reconstruction after NSM as compared with skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) remain unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction and NAC outcomes of breast cancer patients who underwent spared or reconstructed NAC after unilateral NSM as compared with unilateral SSM.

Methods

Patients who underwent immediate expander–implant breast reconstruction following unilateral NSM or SSM were included. Medical records of patients from April 2010 to February 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Reconstruction-related complications such as infection, seroma, haematoma, delayed wound healing, and reconstruction failure were recorded. NAC outcome analysis was performed using preoperative and postoperative digital photographs for each patient. Patient satisfaction with the reconstructed breast and NAC was assessed using a study-specific questionnaire.

Results

Delayed wound healing occurred in 18 of 55 NSM patients and 15 of 85 SSM patients (p = 0.040). Final reconstruction failure occurred in 0 NSM patients and 6 SSM patients (p = 0.043). The mean photography analysis score of total aesthetic outcome was 13.12 ± 2.39 in the NSM group and 14.06 ± 2.75 in the SSM group (p = 0.052). The mean questionnaire score of NAC position was 2.88 ± 0.85 in the NSM group and 3.80 ± 0.84 in the SSM group (p = 0.001). The mean questionnaire score of NAC sensitivity was 2.12 ± 0.58 in the NSM group and 1.84 ± 0.46 in the SSM group (p = 0.003). Satisfaction with the reconstructed breast was similar (p = 0.913) after NSM and SSM.

Conclusions

We observed no significant difference in breast reconstruction satisfaction between the NSM and SSM groups. Although overall satisfaction with breast reconstruction is high, patients in the NSM group often report dissatisfaction with nipple position. With a favourable score for NAC position, skin-sparing mastectomy followed by NAC reconstruction can be considered as a balanced alternative to NSM for properly selected patients with breast cancer.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rusby JE, Smith BL, Gui GP (2010) Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Br J Surg 97:305–316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Spear SL, Hannan CM, Willey SC, Cocilovo C (2009) Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:1665–1673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Metcalfe KA, Cil TD, Semple JL, Li LD, Bagher S, Zhong T, Virani S, Narod S, Pal T (2015) Long-term psychosocial functioning in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: does preservation of the nipple-areolar complex make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol 22:3324–3330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr, Karas T, Cohen BE (2002) Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:457–463 (discussion 464-465)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, Bedolis R, Rotmensz N, Maldifassi A, Santillo B, Luini A, Galimberti V, Scaffidi E, Lupo F, Martella S, Petit JY (2009) Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat 118:623–633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia-Etienne CA, Cody Iii HS 3rd, Disa JJ, Cordeiro P, Sacchini V (2009) Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of literature. Breast J 15:440–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED, Cocilovo C, Sidawy M, Al-Attar A, Hannan C, Seiboth L, Nahabedian MY (2011) Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:1005–1014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, Crotty TP, Myers JL, Arnold PG, Petty PM, Sellers TA, Johnson JL, McDonnell SK, Frost MH, Jenkins RB (1999) Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 340:77–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen CM, Disa JJ, Sacchini V, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ, Garcia-Etienne CA, Cordeiro PG (2009) Nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1772–1780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Rey P, Martella S, Didier F, Viale G, Veronesi P, Luini A, Galimberti V, Bedolis R, Rietjens M, Garusi C, De Lorenzi F, Bosco R, Manconi A, Ivaldi GB, Youssef O (2009) Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years experience at the European institute of oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:333–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, Luini A, Pluchinotta A, Pinotti M, Boratto MG, Ricci MD, Ruiz CA, Nisida AC, Veronesi P, Petit J, Arnone P, Bassi F, Disa JJ, Garcia-Etienne CA, Borgen PI (2006) Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg 203:704–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, Kundt G, Reimer T (2009) The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg 249:461–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Salgarello M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L (2010) Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcomes and technical refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1460–1471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cho JW, Yoon ES, You HJ, Kim HS, Lee BI, Park SH (2015) Nipple-areola complex necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate autologous breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 42:601–607

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee KT, Pyon JK, Bang SI, Lee JE, Nam SJ, Mun GH (2013) Does the reconstruction method influence development of mastectomy flap complications in nipple-sparing mastectomy? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:1543–1550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wijayanayagam A, Kumar AS, Foster RD, Esserman LJ (2008) Optimizing the total skin-sparing mastectomy. Arch Surg 143:38–45 (discussion 45)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Regolo L, Ballardini B, Gallarotti E, Scoccia E, Zanini V (2008) Nipple sparing mastectomy: an innovative skin incision for an alternative approach. Breast 17:8–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, Morrow M, Pusic A, Sacchini VS (2011) Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 18:3117–3122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim HJ, Park EH, Lim WS, Seo JY, Koh BS, Lee TJ, Eom JS, Lee SW, Son BH, Lee JW, Ahn SH (2010) Nipple areola skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure: a single center study. Ann Surg 251:493–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner JL, Fearmonti R, Hunt KK, Hwang RF, Meric-Bernstam F, Kuerer HM, Bedrosian I, Crosby MA, Baumann DP, Ross MI, Feig BW, Krishnamurthy S, Hernandez M, Babiera GV (2012) Prospective evaluation of the nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy for risk reduction and for early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1137–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Verschuer VM, Mureau MA, Gopie JP, Vos EL, Verhoef C, Menke-Pluijmers MB, Koppert LB (2016) Patient satisfaction and nipple-areola sensitivity after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate implant breast reconstruction in a high breast cancer risk population: nipple-sparing mastectomy versus skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg 77:145–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Voltura AM, Tsangaris TN, Rosson GD, Jacobs LK, Flores JI, Singh NK, Argani P, Balch CM (2008) Nipple-sparing mastectomy: critical assessment of 51 procedures and implications for selection criteria. Ann Surg Oncol 15:3396–3401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ou KW, Yu JC, Ho MH, Chiu WK, Ou KL, Chen TM, Chen SG (2015) Oncological safety and outcomes of nipple-sparing mastectomy with breast reconstruction: a single-centered experience in Taiwan. Ann Plast Surg 74(Suppl 2):S127–S131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Colwell AS, Tessler O, Lin AM, Liao E, Winograd J, Cetrulo CL, Tang R, Smith BL, Austen WG Jr (2014) Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:496–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peled AW, Duralde E, Foster RD, Fiscalini AS, Esserman LJ, Hwang ES, Sbitany H (2014) Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 72(Suppl 1):S48–S52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Warren Peled A, Foster RD, Stover AC, Itakura K, Ewing CA, Alvarado M, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ (2012) Outcomes after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction in 657 breasts. Ann Surg Oncol 19:3402–3409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Boneti C, Yuen J, Santiago C, Diaz Z, Robertson Y, Korourian S, Westbrook KC, Henry-Tillman RS, Klimberg VS (2011) Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 212:686–693 (discussion 693-695)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sbitany H, Wang F, Peled AW, Alvarado M, Ewing CA, Esserman LJ, Foster RD (2016) Tissue expander reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: defining the effects of coverage technique on nipple/areola preservation. Ann Plast Surg 77:17–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Niemeyer M, Paepke S, Schmid R, Plattner B, Muller D, Kiechle M (2011) Extended indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Breast J 17:296–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Burdge EC, Yuen J, Hardee M, Gadgil PV, Das C, Henry-Tillman R, Ochoa D, Korourian S, Suzanne Klimberg V (2013) Nipple skin-sparing mastectomy is feasible for advanced disease. Ann Surg Oncol 20:3294–3302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mori H, Uemura N, Okazaki M, Nakagawa T, Sato T (2016) Nipple malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy and expander-implant reconstruction. Breast Cancer 23:740–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Small K, Kelly KM, Swistel A, Dent BL, Taylor EM, Talmor M (2014) Surgical treatment of nipple malposition in nipple-sparing mastectomy device-based reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:1053–1062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Spear SL, Albino FP, Al-Attar A (2013) Classification and management of the postoperative, high-riding nipple. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1413–1421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Troy JS, Chung S, Dayicioglu D (2015) Precision nipple positioning after nipple sparing mastectomy with hydrocolloid nipple adjuster. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68:e15–e17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Munhoz AM, Aldrighi C, Montag E, Arruda E, Aldrighi JM, Filassi JR, Ricci M, Brasil JA, Rezende V, Ferreira MC (2009) Optimizing the nipple-areola sparing mastectomy with double concentric periareolar incision and biodimensional expander-implant reconstruction: aesthetic and technical refinements. Breast 18:356–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Salgarello M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L, Franceschini G, Masetti R (2015) Contralateral breast symmetrisation in immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction after unilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy: the tailored reduction/augmentation mammaplasty. Arch Plast Surg 42:302–308

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Choonhae Hospital, Busan, South Korea

    Hyungsuk Kim

  2. Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea

    Sun-June Park & Sa Ik Bang

  3. Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea

    Kyong-Je Woo

Authors
  1. Hyungsuk Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sun-June Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kyong-Je Woo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sa Ik Bang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sa Ik Bang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H., Park, SJ., Woo, KJ. et al. Comparative Study of Nipple–Areola Complex Position and Patient Satisfaction After Unilateral Mastectomy and Immediate Expander–Implant Reconstruction Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy. Aesth Plast Surg 43, 313–327 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1217-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1217-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation