Skip to main content
Log in

An Experimental Study of Auricular Reconstruction Using a Thin Porous Silastic Frame Assisted by Tissue Expansion: An Animal Study

  • Original Article
  • Experimental/Special Topics
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In the 1960s, the silastic ear frame was used for auricular reconstruction. Most surgeons abandoned the use of the silastic ear frame in the 1980s because of the high incidence of exposure. In this study, we introduce the computer-aided design and manufacture of a thin, porous silastic auricle frame and investigate the possibility of auricular reconstruction using this frame assisted by tissue expansion.

Methods

An adult male with average sized, normal ears was selected. A spiral CT scan was performed to obtain primitive data on his external ear. Mimics-8.1 and Geomagic studio-12 were used for 3D reconstruction and image processing. A thin, porous silastic auricle frame 1.4 mm in thickness was manufactured. A 50 ml kidney-shaped tissue expander was implanted between the panniculus carnosus and the deep fascia through an incision on the back of each of 10 New Zealand white rabbits. Each week the expander was inflated with 10 ml saline to a total of 160 m1. Maintenance of the expansion lasted for a month. The expander was then removed, and the silastic auricle frame was inserted into the pocket. The reconstructed ears were observed for 6 months postoperatively.

Results

The reconstructed ears remained soft and flexible, with no deformation, contracture, or extrusion observed 6 months postoperatively. The scaphoid fossa, triangular fossa, cavum, helix, and antihelix remained defined.

Conclusions

The silastic frame, 1.4 mm in thickness manufactured by computer-aided design, stood up to the contraction of the overlying expanded flap. It is possible to be used for auricular reconstruction assisted by tissue expansion.

No Level Assigned

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cronin TD (1966) Use of a silastic frame for total and subtotal reconstruction of the external ear: preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 37(5):399–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cronin TD (1968) Follow-up study of silastic frame for reconstruction of external ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 42(6):522–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Monrne CW (1972) Our experience with the silicone ear flamework: a report of 17 ears and 15 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 49(4):428–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ohmori S (1974) Follow up study on reconstruction of microtia with silicone framework. Plast Reconstr Surg 53(5):555–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ohmori S (1979) A refined approach to ear reconstruction with silastic frames in major degrees of microtia. Br J Plast Surg 32(4):267–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ohmori S, Sekiguchi H (1984) Follow-up study of the reconstruction of microtia using silastic frame. Aesthet Plast Surg 8(1):1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanzer RC (1967) Total reconstruction of the auricle: a 10-year report. Plast Reconstr Surg 40(6):547–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanzer RC (1978) Microtia. Clin Plast Surg 5(3):317–336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brent B (1980) The correction of microtia with autogenous cartilage graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 66(1):1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oneal RM, Rohrich RJ (1984) Skin expansion as an adjunct to reconstruction of the extend ear. Br J Plast Surg 37(4):517–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hata Y, Hosokawa K, Yano K et al (1989) Correction of microtia using the tissue expander. Plast Reconstr Surg 84(5):741–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sasaki GI (1990) Tissue-expansion in reconstruction of acquired auricle. Chin Plast Surg 17(2):327–338

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chana JS, Grobbelaar AO (1997) Tissue expansion as an adjunct to construction of congenital and acquired auricular deformities. Br J Plast Surg 50(6):456–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu J, Sun J, Li X (2011) Total auricular reconstruction without skin grafting. Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(10):1312–1317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zuo jun Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, L., Zhou, J.l. & Zhao, Z.j. An Experimental Study of Auricular Reconstruction Using a Thin Porous Silastic Frame Assisted by Tissue Expansion: An Animal Study. Aesth Plast Surg 39, 602–607 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0510-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0510-z

Keywords

Navigation