Abstract
Background
Nipple-areola complex (NAC) lateralisation in the horizontal axis is understudied with respect to its potential effects on the outcome of augmentation mammoplasty. An implant pocket dissected slightly laterally on the affected side offsets the lateralised nipple and improves the quality of breast enhancement in the lateral quadrant with an aesthetically positioned NAC. It also prevents the appearance of medially malplaced implants.
Methods
Medial and lateral halves of breasts were measured in 312 mammaplasties performed by the author in 2007; of these, 39 (12%) had NAC asymmetrically positioned in the horizontal plane, 29 (9%) were right lateralised, 4 (1.2%) left lateralised, 5 (1.5%) bilaterally lateralised, and 1 (0.3%) was bilaterally medialised. In the more common right-lateralised group (n = 25), the mean medial half measurement was 8.76 ± 1.22 cm compared with 8.96 cm in the control group (n = 170), with no statistical significance (P = 0.45). However, the lateral half measurement in the lateralised nipple group (n = 25) was 9.06 ± 1.53 cm compared with 9.7 ± 1.67 cm in the control group (n = 169) and it showed a borderline significant value (P = 0.06). On the affected side, the medial boundary of the breast pocket is marked 0.25–0.5 cm further away from the routine 2.5-cm intermammary distance with the goal of offsetting the lateralised NAC and to improve its visual aesthetic position on the breast.
Results and Conclusion
Lateralisation of the breast pocket in a breast with a lateralised nipple improves the aesthetic position of the NAC. In compensated augmentation mammaplasties, lateral quadrant enhancement of the breast is aesthetically superior to uncompensated cases and prevents the appearance of medially malplaced implants. The intermammary distance in compensated cases was acceptable without any compromise to the aesthetic outcome.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Reilley AF (2006) Breast asymmetry: classification and management. Aesth Surg J 26:596–600
Arco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Gentile P, Castri F, Delogu D, Filingeri V, Cervelli V (2006) Breast asymmetries: a brief review and our experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30:309–319
Morello DC, Christensen M, Hidalgo DA, Spear SL (2003) Breast asymmetry. Aesth Surg J 23:472–479
Rohrich RJ, Hartley W, Brown S (2005) Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetry in breast augmentation: a retrospective analysis of 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1039–1050
Khan UD (2007) Muscle splitting biplane breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:353–358
Smith DJ Jr, Palin WE Jr, Katch VL, Bennett JE (1986) Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: normal values. Plast Reconstr Surg 78:331–335
Westerich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:468–479
Brown TP, La H, Ringrose RE, Hyland AA, Cole AA, Brotherston TM (1999) A method of assessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application. Br J Plast Surg 52:355–359
Spear SL, Little JW 3rd (1988) Breast capsulorrhaphy. Plast Reconstr Surg 81:274–279
Chasen PE, Francis CS (2008) Capsulorrhaphy for revisionary breast surgery. Aesth Surg J 28:63–69
Acknowledgments
Statistical analysis was done by Dr. Amir Omair, Fatima Memorial Hospital and Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan. I thank Dr. Thomas M. Biggs for his continuous support and ideas. The inception of this article was one of them.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, U.D. Breast Augmentation in Asymmetrically Placed Nipple-Areola Complex in the Horizontal Axis: Lateralisation of Implant Pocket to Offset Lateralised Nipples. Aesth Plast Surg 33, 591–596 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9324-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9324-1