Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 70, Issue 8, pp 1277–1289

Inferring social structure and its drivers from refuge use in the desert tortoise, a relatively solitary species

  • Pratha Sah
  • Kenneth E. Nussear
  • Todd C. Esque
  • Christina M. Aiello
  • Peter J. Hudson
  • Shweta Bansal
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00265-016-2136-9

Cite this article as:
Sah, P., Nussear, K.E., Esque, T.C. et al. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2016) 70: 1277. doi:10.1007/s00265-016-2136-9

Abstract

For several species, refuges (such as burrows, dens, roosts, nests) are an essential resource for protection from predators and extreme environmental conditions. Refuges also serve as focal sites for social interactions, including mating, courtship, and aggression. Knowledge of refuge use patterns can therefore provide information about social structure, mating, and foraging success, as well as the robustness and health of wildlife populations, especially for species considered to be relatively solitary. In this study, we construct networks of burrow use to infer social associations in a threatened wildlife species typically considered solitary—the desert tortoise. We show that tortoise social networks are significantly different than null networks of random associations, and have moderate spatial constraints. We next use statistical models to identify major mechanisms behind individual-level variation in tortoise burrow use, popularity of burrows in desert tortoise habitat, and test for stressor-driven changes in refuge use patterns. We show that seasonal variation has a strong impact on tortoise burrow switching behavior. On the other hand, burrow age and topographical condition influence the number of tortoises visiting a burrow in desert tortoise habitat. Of three major population stressors affecting this species (translocation, drought, disease), translocation alters tortoise burrow switching behavior, with translocated animals visiting fewer unique burrows than residents. In a species that is not social, our study highlights the importance of leveraging refuge use behavior to study the presence of and mechanisms behind non-random social structure and individual-level variation. Our analysis of the impact of stressors on refuge-based social structure further emphasizes the potential of this method to detect environmental or anthropogenic disturbances.

Significance statement

Adaptive and social behavior that affects fitness is now being increasingly incorporated in the conservation and management of wildlife species. However, direct observations of social interactions in species considered to be solitary are difficult, and therefore integration of behavior in conservation and management decisions in such species has been infrequent. For such species, we propose quantifying refuge use behavior as it can provide insights towards their (hidden) social structure, establish relevant contact patterns of infectious disease spread, and provide early warning signals of population stressors. Our study highlights this approach in a long-lived and threatened species, the desert tortoise. We provide evidence toward the presence of and identify mechanisms behind the social structure in desert tortoises formed by their burrow use preferences. We also show how individuals burrow use behavior responds to the presence of population stressors.

Keywords

Behavioral stress response Bipartite networks Gopherus agassizii Generalized linear mixed models Modularity Mycoplasma agassizii 

Supplementary material

265_2016_2136_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (410 kb)
(PDF 410 KB)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pratha Sah
    • 1
  • Kenneth E. Nussear
    • 2
  • Todd C. Esque
    • 3
  • Christina M. Aiello
    • 3
    • 4
  • Peter J. Hudson
    • 4
  • Shweta Bansal
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of BiologyGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of Nevada RenoRenoUSA
  3. 3.U. S. Geological SurveyWestern Ecological Research CenterHendersonUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  5. 5.Fogarty International CenterNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations