Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamics of biparental care in a burying beetle: experimental handicapping results in partner compensation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Negotiation models of biparental care predict that parents should partially compensate for a reduction in the level of care that their partner provides. A number of studies, mostly with monogamous birds, have tested this prediction by removing or manipulating the level of effort of one parent and then measuring the response of the other parent. In this study, we test this prediction with the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis, which breeds on small vertebrate carcasses and provides biparental care to their young. We reduced the effort of either the male or female parent by attaching a weight to their elytron and evaluated the effect that their reduction in time spent providing care had on their partner’s level of effort during the carcass preparation stage of reproduction. After their partner was weighted, males increased the time spent preparing the carcass by 28 %. Females were already spending nearly 100 % of their time working and observed changes in effort were negligible. Our results show that parents directly monitor their partner’s level of effort in the carcass preparation stage of reproduction. This is the first handicapping study in an invertebrate species to provide support for the negotiation model of intersexual conflict over parental investment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartlett J (1987) Filial cannibalism in burying beetles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:179–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu M, Raclot T, Dervaux A, Le Maho Y, Ropert-Coudert Y, Ancel A (2009) Can a handicapped parent rely on its partner? An experimental study within Adélie penguin pairs. Anim Behav 78:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boncoraglio G, Kilner RM (2012) Female burying beetles benefit from male desertion: sexual conflict and counter-adaptation over parental investment. PLoS ONE 7:e31713. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031713

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burley N (1986) Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am Nat 127:415–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter SC, Ward RJS, Kilner RM (2011) Age-specific reproductive investment in female burying beetles: independent effects of state and risk of death. Funct Ecol 25:652–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton JC (2005) Population density, body size, and phenotypic plasticity of brood size in a burying beetle. Behav Ecol 16:1031–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton JC, Heflin ND, Belk MC (2009) Cost of reproduction, resource quality, and terminal investment in a burying beetle. Am Nat 174:673–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fetherston IA, Scott MP, Traniello JFA (1990) Parental care in burying beetles: the organization of male and female brood-care behavior. Ethology 85:177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetherston IA, Scott MP, Traniello JFA (1994) Behavioral compensation for mate loss in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis. Anim Behav 47:777–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison F, Barta Z, Cuthill I, Székely T (2009) How is sexual conflict over parental care resolved? A meta-analysis. J Evolution Biol 22:1800–1812

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinde CA (2006) Negotiation over offspring care?—a positive response to partner-provisioning rate in great tits. Behav Ecol 17:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinde CA, Kilner RM (2007) Negotiations within the family over the supply of parental care. Proc R Soc B 274:53–60

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houston AI, Davies NB (1985) The evolution of co-operation and life history in the dunnock, Prunella modularis. In: Sibly RM, Smith RH (eds) Behavioural ecology: ecological consequences of adaptive behaviour. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 471–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston AI, Székely T, McNamara JM (2005) Conflict between parents over care. Trends Ecol Evol 20:33–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW (2002) Behavioural dynamics of biparental care in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Anim Behav 64:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins EV, Morris C, Blackman S (2000) Delayed benefits of paternal care in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides. Anim Behav 60:443–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone RA, Hinde CA (2006) Negotiation over offspring care—how should parents respond to each other’s efforts? Behav Ecol 17:818–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones KM, Ruxton GD, Monaghan P (2002) Model parents: is full compensation for reduced partner nest attendance compatible with stable biparental care? Behav Ecol 13:838–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosztolányi A, Cuthill IC, Székely T (2009) Negotiation between parents over care: reversible compensation during incubation. Behav Ecol 20:446–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lendvai AZ, Chastel O (2008) Experimental mate-removal increases the stress response of female house sparrows: the effects of offspring value? Horm Behav 53:395–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lendvai AZ, Barta Z, Chastel O (2009) Conflict over parental care in house sparrows: do females use a negotiation rule? Behav Ecol 20:651–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazuc J, Chastel O, Sorci G (2003) No evidence for differential maternal allocation to offspring in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14:340–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara JM, Gasson CE, Houston AI (1999) Incorporating rules for responding into evolutionary games. Nature 401:368–371

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara JM, Houston AI, Barta Z, Osorno JL (2003) Should young ever be better off with one parent than with two? Behav Ecol 14:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller JK, Eggert AK, Sakaluk SK (1998) Carcass maintenance and biparental brood care in burying beetles: are males redundant? Ecol Entomol 23:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (2006) Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Philos T Roy Soc B 361:235–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rauter CM, Moore AJ (1999) Do honest signaling models of offspring solicitation apply to insects? P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 266:1691–1696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauter CM, Moore AJ (2004) Time constraints and trade-offs among parental care behaviours: effects of brood size, sex, and loss of mate. Anim Behav 68:695–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk SK, Eggert AK, Müller JK (1998) The ‘widow effect’ and its consequences for reproduction in burying beetles. Ethology 104:553–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz JJ, Kranenbarg S, Tinbergen JM (2000) Differential response by males and females to manipulation of partner contribution in the great tit (Parus major). J Anim Ecol 69:74–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwagmeyer PL, Mock DW, Parker GA (2002) Biparental care in house sparrows: negotiation or sealed bid? Behav Ecol 13:713–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwagmeyer PL, Schwabl HG, Mock DW (2005) Dynamics of biparental care in house sparrows: hormonal manipulations of paternal contributions. Anim Behav 69:481–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP (1998) The ecology and behavior of burying beetles. Annu Rev of Entom 43:595–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP, Traniello JFA (1990) Behavioural and ecological correlates of male and female parental care and reproductive success in burying beetles (Nicrophorus spp.). Anim Behav 39:274–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC (2000) Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends in Ecol and Evol 15:397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T, Lifjeld JT (1990) Influence of male and female quality on clutch size in tits (Parus spp.). Ecology 71:1258–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smiseth PT, Moore AJ (2004) Behavioral dynamics between caring males and females in a beetle with facultative biparental care. Behav Ecol 15:612–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smiseth PT, Dawson C, Varley E, Moore AJ (2005) How do caring parents respond to mate loss? Differential response by males and females. Anim Behav 69:551–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smiseth PT, Musa S, Moore AJ (2006) Negotiation between parents: does the timing of mate loss affect female compensation in Nicrophorus vespilloides? Behaviour 143:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinegger M, Taborsky B (2007) Asymmetric sexual conflict over parental care in a biparental cichlid. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:933–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoehr AM, Hill GE (2000) Testosterone and the allocation of reproductive effort in male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:407–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki S, Nagano M (2009) To compensate or not? Caring parents respond differentially to mate removal and mate handicapping in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus quadripunctatus. Ethology 115:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajima K, Nakamuara M (2003) Response to manipulation of partner contribution: a handicapping experiment in the barn swallow. Ornithol Sci 2:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST (1991) Reproductive benefits and the duration of paternal care in a biparental burying beetle, Nicrophorus orbicollis. Behaviour 117:82–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST (2006) Infanticide, sexual selection and task specialization in a biparental burying beetle. Anim Behav 72:1159–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST, Fernandez AG (1995) Regulation of brood size by male parents and cues employed to assess resource size by burying beetles. Ethol, Ecol and Evol 7:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe KL (2010) Negotiation of parental care when the stakes are high: experimental handicapping of one partner during incubation leads to short-term generosity. J Anim Ecol 79:63–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS, Fudge J (1984) Burying beetles: intraspecific interactions and reproductive success in the field. Ecol Entomol 9:195–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright DS, Cuthill I (1989) Manipulations of sex differences in parental care. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright DS, Cuthill I (1990a) Biparental care: short-term manipulation of partner contribution and brood size in the starling, Sturnus vulgaris. Behav Ecol 1:116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright DS, Cuthill I (1990b) Manipulations of sex differences in parental care: the effect of brood size. Anim Behav 40:462–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded in part by an undergraduate research grant from Purdue University Calumet. We thank D. Mock, A. Moore, S. Sakaluk, and S. Trumbo for their constructive reviews of our manuscript. We also thank N. Heflin and S. Zlotorzynski for assistance in maintaining laboratory animals and J. Shoup and S. Shoup for allowing us to collect beetles on their property.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

The experiments described herein comply with the current laws of the USA, the country in which they were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University Calumet, Hammond, IN, 46323, USA

    J. Curtis Creighton, Ashlee N. Smith & April Komendat

  2. Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, USA

    Ashlee N. Smith & Mark C. Belk

Authors
  1. J. Curtis Creighton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashlee N. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. April Komendat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mark C. Belk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Curtis Creighton.

Additional information

Communicated by S. Sakaluk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Creighton, J.C., Smith, A.N., Komendat, A. et al. Dynamics of biparental care in a burying beetle: experimental handicapping results in partner compensation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69, 265–271 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1839-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1839-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation