Skip to main content
Log in

Specific targeting of host individuals by a kleptoparasitic bird

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kleptoparasitism is a tactic used to acquire food opportunistically and has been shown to provide several benefits, including greater food intake rate and the acquisition of items not normally available during self-foraging. Host individuals may differ in their ability to defend themselves against kleptoparasitic attacks and therefore identifying those host individuals that are particularly vulnerable to attack could both provide energetic benefits and increase the efficiency of kleptoparasitism as a foraging strategy. Here, we show that the kleptoparasitic fork-tailed drongo (Dicrurus adsimilis) specifically targets juveniles when following groups of cooperatively breeding pied babblers (Turdoides bicolor). Drongos give alarm calls upon sighting a predator, thus providing extra predator vigilance to foraging pied babblers. However, drongos also use alarm calls to steal food items. During kleptoparasitic attacks, drongos give false alarm calls and then swoop down to steal food items dropped by alarmed babblers. Juvenile pied babblers are particularly vulnerable to attack because they (a) spend a longer period handling prey items prior to consumption and (b) respond to alarm calls primarily by immediately moving to cover, in contrast to adults who respond by looking up and visually scanning the surrounding area. Drongos attack juvenile babblers significantly more often than adults, with attacks on juveniles more likely to result in the successful procurement of a food item. This patterns of attack suggests that drongos are able to differentiate between individuals of different age when targeting pied babblers, thus increasing the efficiency of kleptoparasitism as a foraging strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann SA (1988) Foraging for survival: yearling baboons in Africa. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bionski S, Fragaszy DM (1989) The ontogeny of foraging in squirrel monkeys. Anim Behav 37:415–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann HJ, Barnard CJ (1979) Kleptoparasitism in birds. Anim Behav 27:487–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calsbeek R, Sinervo B (2002) The ontogeny of territoriality during maturation. Oecologia 132:468–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM (1980) Effects of the mother, object play and adult experience on predation in cats. Behav Neur Biol 29:29–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Child, M.F. 2006. Cunning kleptoparasitism: dynamic strategies to obtain food rewards in a terrestrial system. Honours thesis, University of Cape Town

  • Crawley MJ (2002) Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-plus. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK

  • Cumming GS, Bernard RTF (1997) Rainfall, food abundance and timing of parturition in African bats. Oecologia 111:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraldeau LA, Caraco T (2000) Social Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale E, Kotagama SW (2006) Context-dependent vocal mimicry in a passerine bird. Pro Roy Soc B 273:875–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griesser M, Ekman J (2005) Nepotistic mobbing behaviour in the Siberian jay Perisoreus infaustus. Anim Behav 69:345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson JG (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7:107–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD (1988) How infant vervet monkeys learn to recognise starling alarm calls: the role of experience. Behaviour 105:187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinsohn RG (1991) Slow learning of foraging skills and extended parental care in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs. Am Nat 137:864–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockey PAR, Dean WRJ, Ryan PG (eds) (2005) Robert’s birds of Southern Africa, 7th edn. The Trustees of the John Voelcker Bird Fund, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Holekamp KE, Smale L (1998) Behavioral development in the spotted hyena. Bioscience 48:997–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollĕn LI, Manser MB (2006) Ontogeny of alarm call responses in meerkats, Suricata suricatta: the roles of age, sex and nearby conspecifics. Anim Behav 72:1345–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollĕn LI, Bell MBV, Radford AR (2008) Cooperative sentinel calling? Foragers gain increased biomass intake. Curr Biol 18:576–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langen TA (1996) Skill acquisition and the timing of natal dispersal in the white-throated magpie-jay, Calocitta formosa. Anim Behav 51:575–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langen TA (2000) Prolonged offspring dependence and cooperative breeding in birds. Behav Ecol 11:367–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On the optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti K, Price T (1989) Differences in the foraging of juvenile and adult birds: the importance of developmental constraints. Biol Rev 64:51–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morand-Ferron J, Veillette M, Lefebvre L (2006) Stealing of dunked food in Carib grackles (Quiscalus lugubris). Behav Proc 73:342–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morand-Ferron J, Sol D, Lefebvre L (2007) Food stealing in birds: brains or brawn? Anim Behav 74:1725–1734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raihani NJ, Ridley AR (2007) Adult vocalizations during provisioning: offspring response and post-fledging benefits. Anim Behav 74:1303–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley AR, Raihani NJ (2007) Facultative response to a kleptoparasite by the cooperatively pied babbler. Behav Ecol 18:324–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley AR, Child MF, Bell MBV (2007) Interspecific audience effects on the alarm-calling behaviour of a kleptoparasitic bird. Biol Lett 3:589–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutz C, Whittingham MJ, Newton I (2006) Age-dependent diet choice in an avian top predator. Proc Roy Soc B 273:579–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (1986) Vocal development in vervet monkeys. Anim Behav 34:1640–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shealer DA, Floyd T, Burger J (1997) Host choice and success of gulls & terns kleptoparasitizing brown pelicans. Anim Behav 53:655–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skorka P, Wojcik JD (2008) Habitat utilisation, feeding tactics and age-related feeding efficiency in the Caspian Gull Larus cachinnans. J Ornith 149:31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A, McAuliffe K (2006) Teaching in wild meerkats. Science 313:227–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wunderle JM (1991) Age-specific foraging proficiency in birds. Curr Ornith 8:273–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoerg SJ (1994) Development of foraging behaviour in the Eurasian dipper, Cinclus cinclus, from fledging until dispersal. Anim Behav 47:577–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zack S, Stutchbury BJ (1992) Delayed breeding in avian social systems; the role of territory quality and “floater” tactics. Behaviour 123:194–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Northern Cape Conservation Authority for research permits. The Kuruman Reserve Trust, Mr. and Mrs. H Kotze and Mr. and Mrs. de Bruin kindly allowed us access to their land in the southern Kalahari. We thank all researchers at the Kuruman River Reserve for support and encouragement over the duration of our study and our fellow babbler and drongo researchers Nichola Raihani, Martha Nelson-Flower, Andrew Radford and Tom Flower for help and advice during data collection. We thank two anonymous reviewers for useful comments that greatly improved the manuscript. Special thanks to members of the Percy Fitzpatrick Institute for their continual support and advice. This research was approved by the Ethics Committee, Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town (AEC no. 2006/V15/AR). Funding was kindly provided by the DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy Fitzpatrick Institute, University of Cape Town.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. R. Ridley.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Soler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ridley, A.R., Child, M.F. Specific targeting of host individuals by a kleptoparasitic bird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63, 1119–1126 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0766-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0766-x

Keywords

Navigation