Skip to main content
Log in

Letter to the editor regarding “Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Shi R, Wang F, Hong X, Wang YT, Bao JP, Liu L, Wang XH, Xie ZY, Wu XT (2019) Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 43(4):923–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [EB/OL]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Http: // www. cochrane-handbook.org

  3. Furlan AD, Malmivaara A, Chou R, Maher CG, Deyo RA, Schoene M, Bronfort G, van Tulder MW, Editorial Board of the Cochrane Back, Neck Group (2015) 2015 updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the Cochrane back and neck group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:1660–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D (2011) The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mu X, Wei J, A J, Li Z, Ou Y (2018) The short-term efficacy and safety of artificial total disc replacement for selected patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease compared with anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 13(12):e0209660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bo Hou or Zhian He.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mu, X., Ou, Y., Hou, B. et al. Letter to the editor regarding “Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis”. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 44, 1015–1016 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04421-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04421-y

Navigation