Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term outcome of first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion in the treatment of severe hallux rigidus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

This study was aimed to study the arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint using an oblique interfragmentary lag screw and dorsal plate as an effective option for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Few researchers have studied the outcome of this surgical method over a long follow-up period.

Patients and methods

We performed a retrospective review of 60 patients status post arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. The mean age was 68.5 years and average follow-up lasted for 47.3 months. Patients’ satisfaction and functional outcomes were evaluated with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Scale, the foot and ankle questionnaire, the Functional Foot Index, and dynamic pedobarography.

Results

Fusion rate of 93.3 % was recorded; 6.7 % of the cases ended up with a painless pseudarthrosis and required no additional surgery. Pedobarographic measurements demonstrated first ray weight bearing function restoration. More physiological foot plantar pressure patterns were observed. Concerning the postoperative outcomes, 71.7 % of the patients were very satisfied and 18.3 % were satisfied. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Scale increased post-operatively from 40.9 to 79.3.

Conclusion

The arthrodesis of the metatarsophalangeal joint using transarticular screw and dorsal nonlocked plate is an effective method for the treatment of severe hallux rigidus with fair patient satisfaction rate and functional outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yee G, Lau J (2008) Current concepts review: hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int 29(6):637–646. doi:10.3113/FAI.2008.0637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS (2004) Hallux rigidus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A suppl 1(Pt 2):119–130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shariff R, Myerson MS (2015) The use of osteotomy in the management of hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Clin 20(3):493–502. doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2015.05.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferguson CM, Ellington JK (2015) Operative technique: interposition arthroplasty and biological augmentation of hallux rigidus surgery. Foot Ankle Clin 20(3):513–524. doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2015.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim PH, Chen X, Hillstrom H, Ellis SJ, Baxter JR, Deland JT (2016) Moberg osteotomy shifts contact pressure plantarly in the first metatarsophalangeal joint in a biomechanical model. Foot Ankle Int 37(1):96–101. doi:10.1177/1071100715603513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coutts A, Kilmartin TE, Ellis MJ (2012) The long-term patient focused outcomes of the Keller’s arthroplasty for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Foot (Edinb) 22(3):167–171. doi:10.1016/j.foot.2012.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Raikin SM, Ahmad J (2008) Comparison of arthrodesis and metallic hemiarthroplasty of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 2 Pt 2):171–180. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar S, Pradhan R, Rosenfeld PF (2010) First metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis using a dorsal plate and a compression screw. Foot Ankle Int 31(9):797–801. doi:10.3113/FAI.2010.0797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Trnka HJ (2000) Arthrodesis procedures for salvage of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint. Foot Ankle Clin 5(3):673–686, ix. Review

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Raikin SM, Ahmad J, Pour AE, Abidi N (2007) Comparison of arthrodesis and metallic hemiarthroplasty of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(9):1979–1985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goucher NR, Coughlin MJ (2006) Hallux metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using dome-shaped reamers and dorsal plate fixation: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int 27(11):869–876

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bennett GL, Kay DB, Sabatta J (2005) First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: an evaluation of hardware failure. Foot Ankle Int 26(8):593–596

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hunt KJ, Barr CR, Lindsey DP, Chou LB (2012) Locked versus nonlocked plate fixation for first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis: a biomechanical investigation. Foot Ankle Int 33(11):984–990. doi:10.3113/FAI.2012.0984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dening J, van Erve RH (2012) Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: a retrospective analysis of plate versus screw fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg 51(2):172–175. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2011.10.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brodsky JW, Passmore RN, Pollo FE, Shabat S (2005) Functional outcome of arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint using parallel screw fixation. Foot Ankle Int 26(2):140–146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15(7):349–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lewis C, Shaw K (2010) Measuring pain with the foot function index. Advance Healthcare Network. http://physical-therapy.advanceweb.com/Archives/Article-Archives/Measuring-Pain-With-the-Foot-Function-Index.aspx. Accessed 10 May 2016

  18. Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Mazza J, Stuck RM (2013) A review of the foot function index and the foot function index—revised. J Foot Ankle Res 1 6(1):5. doi:10.1186/1757-1146-6-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Johanson NA, Liang MH, Daltroy L, Rudicel S, Richmond J (2004) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments. reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(5):902–909

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL, Nunley JA 2nd (2002) Angular measurements in the evaluation of hallux valgus deformities: a report of the ad hoc committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society on angular measurements. Foot Ankle Int 23(1):68–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith RW, Reynolds JC, Stewart MJ (1984) Hallux valgus assessment: report of research committee of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Foot Ankle 5(2):92–103, Review

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zembsch A, Trnka HJ, Ritschl P (2000) Correction of hallux valgus. metatarsal osteotomy versus excision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (376) 183–194

  23. McNeil DS, Baumhauer JF, Glazebrook MA (2013) Evidence-based analysis of the efficacy for operative treatment of hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int 34(1):15–32. doi:10.1177/1071100712460220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gibson JN, Thomson CE (2005) Arthrodesis or total replacement arthroplasty for hallux rigidus: a randomized controlled trial. Foot Ankle Int 26(9):680–690

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Faldini C, Nanni M, Traina F, Fabbri D, Borghi R, Giannini S (2016) Surgical treatment of hallux valgus associated with flexible flatfoot during growing age. Int Orthop 40(4):737–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Flavin R, Michael MS (2004) Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint using a dorsal titanium contoured plate. Foot Ankle Int 25(11):783–787

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schneider W, Jurenitsch S (2016) Normative data for the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux and lesser toes clinical rating system. Int Orthop 40(2):301–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Coughlin MJ (1990) Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Orthop Rev 9(2):177–186

    Google Scholar 

  29. Poggio D, de Retana PF, Borda D, Hortua P, Asunción J, Rios J (2010) Analysis of the clinical score progressions during the first year after first MTPJ fusion. Foot Ankle Int 31(7):578–583. doi:10.3113/FAI.2010.0578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ellington JK, Jones CP, Cohen BE, Davis WH, Nickisch F, Anderson RB (2010) Review of 107 hallux MTP joint arthrodesis using dome-shaped reamers and a stainless-steel dorsal plate. Foot Ankle Int 31(5):385–390. doi:10.3113/FAI.2010.0385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Myerson MS, Schon LC, McGuigan FX, Oznur A (2000) Result of arthrodesis of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint using bone graft for restoration of length. Foot Ankle Int 21(4):297–306

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pydah SK, Toh EM, Sirikonda SP, Walker CR (2009) Intermetatarsal angular change following fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Foot Ankle Int 30(5):415–418. doi:10.3113/FAI.2009.0415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mann RA, Katcherian DA (1989) Relationship of metatarsophalangeal joint fusion on the intermetatarsal angle. Foot Ankle 10(1):8–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Deland JT, Williams BR (2012) Surgical management of hallux rigidus. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(6):347–358. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-20-06-347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lewis JT, Hanselman AE, Lalli TA, Daigre JL, Santrock RD (2014) Effect of dorsal plate positioning on dorsiflexion angle in arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: a Cadaveric study. Foot Ankle Int 35(8):802–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Willegger M, Holinka J, Ristl R, Wanivenhaus AH, Windhager R, Schuh R (2015) Correction power and complications of first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis for hallux valgus deformity. Int Orthop 39(3):467–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hunt KJ, Ellington JK, Anderson RB, Cohen BE, Davis WH, Jones CP (2011) Locked versus nonlocked plate fixation for hallux MTP arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 32(7):704–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bennett GL, Sabetta J (2009) First metatarsalphalangeal joint arthrodesis: evaluation of plate and screw fixation. Foot Ankle Int 30(8):752–757. doi:10.3113/FAI.2009.0752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mayer SA, Zelenski NA, DeOrio JK, Easley ME, Nunley JA 2nd (2014) A comparison of nonlocking semitubular plates and precontoured locking plates for first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 35(5):438–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Migues A, Calvi J, Sotelano P, Carrasco M, Slullitel G, Conti L (2013) Endomedullary screw fixation for first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 34(8):1152–1157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hyer CF, Glover JP, Berlet GC, Lee TH (2008) Cost comparison of crossed screws versus dorsal plate construct for first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg 47(1):13–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Politi J, John H, Njus G, Bennett GL, Kay DB (2003) First metatarsal-phalangeal joint arthrodesis: a biomechanical assessment of stability. Foot Ankle Int 24(4):332–337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fuhrmann RA (2011) First metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis for hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Clin 16(1):1–12. doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2010.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zura RD, Browne JA (2006) Current concepts in locked plating. J Surg Orthop Adv 15(3):173–176, Review

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamza M. Alrabai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chraim, M., Bock, P., Alrabai, H.M. et al. Long-term outcome of first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion in the treatment of severe hallux rigidus. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 2401–2408 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3277-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3277-1

Keywords

Navigation